Hi,
I have a mastodon account and would like to follow some newspapers with that. I just did, but the newspapers are posting so much that my whole timeline is just spammed with their posts. Often also stuff I am not interested in.
Is anyone else here following newspapers on mastodon? How are you handling the spam?
deleted by creator
I think this really is the best solution to news sites.
I self-host FreshRSS, make good use of its filters, and I can chew through headlines and articles in no time using the web view on a PC or mobile web.
Better to use an rss reader for that. You can get rss feeds directly from every mastodon server I believe.
also lemmy communities, if there are some too high-volume to keep up with in your main feed: https://lemmy.world/feeds/c/fediverse.xml?sort=New
News sites are better to consume via RSS feeds. Check out openrss.org that has feeds for a lot of websites. There are even RSS feeds for Mastodon and Lemmy.
There is no need to go through openrss.org for this.
There is if you want RSS feeds for things like Lemmy search. And if you want the links in feed items to be associated with a single instance. AFAIK, regular Lemmy feeds dont provide that. But ofc people can use Lemmy feeds if they want.
I think normal Lemmy feeds are all associated with the instance. What do you mean by Lemmy search? I know RSS has been around for ages but I’m always keen to make more use of it!
You can get an RSS feed for a Lemmy search term e.g.
Ooh that’s a cool one, cheers!
Are some of these posts, boosts as in reposts? There should be an option to hide a follower’s boosts to prevent then from flooding your TL.
You can also hide replies and use key words filters to help keep your TL tidy.
Eta: links
Somehow get them to have a separate feed/account for each writer, as well as each section,
and only subscribe to those subsections of their output YOU care about.
I don’t expect ANY newspaper to have the working-brains to understand this concept.
Enforcement/enshittification is the only religion which fits in the heads of “executives”, nowadays, right?
Unfortunately, that’s the proper answer.