This isn’t strictly a privacy question as a security one, so I’m asking this in the context of individuals, not organizations.

I currently use OTP 2FA everywhere I can, though some services I use support hardware security keys like the Yubikey. Getting a hardware key may be slightly more convenient since I wouldn’t need to type anything in but could just press a button, but there’s added risk with losing the key (I can easily backup OTP configs).

Do any of you use hardware security keys? If so, do you have a good argument in favor or against specific keys? (e.g. Yubikey, Nitrokey, etc)

  • @solrize
    link
    21
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I have used them and they can give good security but most everyone these days uses phone apps. From an organizational perspective you might use tokens to make it harder for your staff to exfiltrate keys by rooting their phones. For an individual, carrying a FIDO token is potentially more convenient and private than carrying a phone, but the ease of pressing a button vs typing 6 digits isn’t that big a deal unless you do it constantly.

    I guess there is another virtue, if you’re using the phone itself as a login device, with a password manager accessible from the phone. In that case, a 2fa app on the same phone is no longer truly a second factor. A token fixes that. I have a to-do item of setting up my phone to use a token to unlock the TOTP app. So that wouldn’t eliminate typing 6 digits. It would just make the TOTP app use real 2FA.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If you don’t mind, maybe you can answer this question for me. I finally jumped on the Yubikey train recently, added a couple accounts, no problem. But then I noticed apparently I can connect my key to any random install of the authenticator app on any device, and it will show the accounts I have protected with that key.

      To me, this means if I lose my key someone can learn a fair bit about who owned that key just from looking at the accounts on their own phone when they find it on the street. Now someone knows I have the account [email protected] (among others) when they didn’t know that before. Etc.

      I have googled unsuccessfully to find out if for some reason this is less of a problem than I feel like it is, or if it can be masked somehow, but my keyword choices must have been poor.

      Do you have any opinion on this? I googled specifically if it would allow you to set a PIN to unmask that info or similar, but the PIN articles I found seemed to relate to something else.

      • @solrize
        link
        28 months ago

        I’m unfamiliar with how Yubikey works but I thought the FIDO2 protocol was designed to prevent that sort of association. Anyway it doesn’t sound good. Cryptographer’s saying (by Silvio Micali): “A good disguise should not reveal the person’s height”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Oh yeah it clearly seems a bad idea to me, which is why I’m assuming error on my part. 100% though I took an unrelated phone, installed the yubico app, slapped my nfc yubikey up to it, and could see my accounts listed.

          • @solrize
            link
            28 months ago

            Oh I misunderstood what you were describing but yeah, it doesn’t sound good. It sounds like the key is supposed to be an SSO credential for multiple phones? Maybe there’s a way to set it up differently. You might ask their support.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I probably described it poorly.

              It’s nothing that exotic. I use it as MFA for a few different accounts as I assume anyone who has one does. :)

              Using one easy example, I have [email protected] set up and I can clearly see “[email protected]” as a linked account on my yubikey on any device. I can’t do anything with it, but I see my username in the format shown above, and the one time code counting down.

              I don’t actually know why I haven’t gone to their support - hadn’t thought about it for awhile until reading this thread, so that’s a good suggestion and will do.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                28 months ago

                I think y’all are talking about different things. Some sites (like google) have direct yubikey support where you plug the key into the device and what you’re talking about isn’t an issue

                Other sites don’t have direct support, but allow you to use any authenticator app which is what you’re talking about with using the yubico authenticator app/key combination. Plugging it into a yubico authenticator app on any device will show the codes

                Unfortunately I don’t have an answer for a way to protect those other accounts. I guess the hope is that if you lose it, it can’t be tied to your accounts, just the websites themselves

              • @solrize
                link
                28 months ago

                Yeah it would be preferable IMHO if you had to enroll a newly installed app with username and password in addition to the key.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      Would a passcode (different from phone, of course) or biometric unlock for the 2FA app count? For example, I have bitwarden and Aegis, both have fingerprint unlock when opened with a reasonably short timeout. So, even if my phone pin was compromised, both would still require biometric unlock to access.

      • @solrize
        link
        2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Fingerprint might count though I’ve considered fingerprint sensors to be a bit dubious. There was a famous incident in Germany(?) where some government muckymuck called for fingerprint based biometrics in a panel discussion at a security conference. Someone nabbed his water glass afterwards, lifted his fingerprints from it, and fooled a fingerprint reader. You can also duplicate your own fingerprints with Elmer’s glue. Just spread it on your fingertip, let it dry, and peel it off.

        Password to unlock the totp app might count. Auth methods include knowledge such as passwords, objects such as tokens, and physical characteristics like fingerprints. 2fa means one thing from each of two categories. So the phone with the app and stored password is one factor, and the memorized app password is the second. But, remembering and entering complex passwords is a pain, and a lockout in the app for too many wrong passwords is a DOS vector (in the event that you get your phone back after such an attack). So it sounds annoying, idk.

        I guess you might already have a similar lock on your whole phone anyway, so another one on the app might be redundant.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          Right, so fingerprint on everything wouldn’t be the best practice, because it’s all in one category and everything can be unlocked by a compromise of that one thing.

          That’s a good point. I might look at removing that from my totp app and using a passcode instead.

          • @solrize
            link
            2
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yeah and if your fingerprint is compromised, you can’t update it.

            I worry most about the phone, since they get stolen all the time and they are full of software vulnerabilities. For my own phone I’m hoping to use a token to unlock. So that’s two objects from one category but the token should be harder to steal, if the thief even knows about it.

            I expect high security stuff like banking ops is done only from on-premises terminals and not from someone’s phone. I will try to ask my buddies in that field.

            Physical location can be an auth factor too: you could have a token permanently installed at your desk, so it activated only when you are there.

            You will probably like the book “Security Engineering” by Ross Anderson if you’re not already familiar with it. PDFs of the full 2nd edition and part of the 3rd are here:

            https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/book.html

    • JustEnoughDucks
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I am very confused what you mean that a phone doesn’t count as a 2nd factor.

      Your password is factor one.

      An OTP is factor 2, whether it is on a phone or a yubikey makes literally 0 difference practically. It is a “something you have”.

      If you need biometric unlock to get into your 2fa app or on the yubikey itself, that is a 3rd factor of “something you are.”

      If you are very worried about someone compromising your phone app and already knowing your password, (which is not how 99% of intrusions are done) then put a pin or fingerprint on your 2FA app and it is back to being a secure 2nd factor.

      The probability of someone breaking into your phone, hacking your bitwarden password, and having a fingerprint exploit that allows them to break into your 2FA app is like 1 in 1 billion unless you are like top 1000 most important people in the world. But as a thought exercise, a dongle indeed has the potential to be more secure because it is an additional “something you have” to your phone.

      • @solrize
        link
        18 months ago

        The idea is that your passwords are stored on the phone. You want a separate long random password for each account, so it’s unfeasible to remember them. It’s also a big pain to type every one such password on a screen keyboard. Thus, the password and the phone are the same factor.

        I have avoided having important passwords on my phone because of this, but some people use their phones more heavily than I do. My more important accounts are only accessed via my laptop, using a TOTP phone app as 2nd factor. I rarely take the laptop out of the house.

        • JustEnoughDucks
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          But this is only the case if you store your passwords in a plaintext file on your phone. Something that I hope nobody would be dumb enough to do, but I guess many people would.

          If you have an encrypted password manager like Bitwarden or so where you have a single long password to open and get at your other long secure passwords, then it is essentially a different factor than your phone, right? Since having the phone unlocked would do nothing to help the attacker get to your password vault.

          • @solrize
            link
            18 months ago

            Well I find it a big pain to type a long complex password on a phone. Ymmv though.

  • /home/pineapplelover
    link
    fedilink
    178 months ago

    I bought 2 yubikeys. I try to use it for as many accounts as I can but I can only think of a handful who allow yubikeys. I would get them if you want to but a good 2fa should work fine. Most banks and actual important stuff barely have totp 2fa anyways.

    • @johannesvanderwhales
      link
      4
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think the best use case will be to use a yubikey with a password manager. That way it doesn’t matter what sites support the security key directly. You could also set up passkeys with the sites so that once you authenticate with your password manager, the login process is transparent. Once more sites support passkeys, anyway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        I suggest having a threat model about what attack(s) your security is protecting against.

        I’d suggest this probably isn’t giving much extra security over a long unique password for your password manager:

        • A remote attacker who doesn’t control your machine, but is trying to phish you will succeed the same - dependent on your practices and password manager to prevent copying text.
        • A remote attacker who does control your machine will also not be affected. Once your password database in the password manager is decrypted, they can take the whole thing, whether or not you used a password or hardware key to decrypt it. The only difference is maybe they need slightly more technical skill than copying the file + using a keylogger - but the biggest threats probably automate this anyway and there is no material difference.
        • A local attacker who makes a single entry to steal your hardware, and then tries to extract data from it, is either advantaged by having a hardware key (if they can steal it, and you don’t also use a password), or is in a neutral position (can’t crack the locked password safe protected by password, don’t have the hardware key / can’t bypass its physical security). It might be an advantage if you can physically protect your hardware key (e.g. take it with you, and your threat model is people who take the database while you are away from it), if you can’t remember a sufficiently unique passphrase.
        • A local attacker who can make a surreptitious entry, and then come back later for the results is in basically the same position as a remote attacker who does control your machine after the first visit.

        That said, it might be able to give you more convenience at the expense of slightly less security - particularly if your threat model is entirely around remote attackers - on the convenience/security trade-off. You would touch a button to decrypt instead of entering a long passphrase.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    158 months ago

    I just ordered couple of yubikeys to play around with. Mainly because my phone died and couldn’t get into Gmail to get my bit warden two factor email without my phone to approve the Gmail login… Luckily phone came back online but was a bit scary to think how tied I was to my phone being operational.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      If you put the yubico authenticator on another device you are back in business. If your phone is not literally your only computing device just install the desktop app. My problem with it (also a noob) is that apparently ANYONE can pick up your yubikey when you lose it, fire up the yubico app on their phone and learn what accounts you have protected with it. I’m guessing this is due to a config error on my part, but so far I have not found a solution.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      Yeah, I really need to re-backup my 2FA. Everything goes through a Google Authenticator clone, which can run on my desktop, but I haven’t actually set it up.

      • haui
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        Me too on the „need backup“. Any idea how to go about that? I know some sites have backup keys for otp but I have no process for storing then and avoiding a bind (like storing the 2FA for my vault in my vault and getting locked out).

        I will probably have to play through scenarios or is there a comprehensive guide on this (probably)?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I use vaultwarden (selfhosted bitwarden), which stores both passwords and OTP keys on my own server, which I backup regulary. This allows acces to my OTP keys from any device, as long as it’s in my local network or connected to my VPN.

          Must say I really like this solution. If one of my devices fail, I have a pretymuch seamless switch to any of my other devices, which are already configured anyways, since it’s also my passwordmanager.

          If the server fails, my phone, pc and laptop all still have the keys cached, so I can use those untill I’ve restored a backup.

          • haui
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Thats my configuration as well. I didnt think of the cache. Thanks for mentioning it.

            I do think having the mfa on there is risky as you factually disable mfa with it imo. Its basically 2 passwords in the same place.

            2nd issue: my vault has mfa as well for the admin account which I cant store in there for obvious reasons.

            So in combination I‘ll probably use a second vault to store these to keep them seperate. Will check out aegis for this.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              For the first issue thats not realy true. To access the totp key you still need the actual device with the key, it’s only now split over multiple devices. Like having multiple bank cards for the same account.

              For the seccond issue: Thats a good point, I have not found a good solution for that either, unfortunately

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          I currently store my backup keys in Bitwarden, but like you said, that’s protected by my OTP solution.

          I see two options here:

          • store backup keys in a completely separate way (paper in a safe, encrypted off-prem storage with security key storing that password, etc)
          • have the OTP running in lots of places - currently just my phone, but could run it on my desktop and laptop as well

          The first is probably better, but I’m planning on the second because I’m less worried about a physical breach of my home by a technical attacker than me losing/breaking my phone at a really bad time and needing my wife to read off an OTP token over the phone in a pinch.

          I do have a Yubikey that I don’t use though, so maybe I’ll try out the more secure option.

          • haui
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Pretty good idea with the yubikey. If they werent 50 bucks I‘d get one but thats a little much for an optional security device that has this one function. Still neat though.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              I’ve got one, but I don’t use it because the main reason I got it (secure my Vanguard account) has a simple SMS backup, so it’s no more secure than SMS… My phone also doesn’t have NFC and the plug is USB-A on the Yubikey, so I can only use it on my desktop unless I carry a dongle around.

              But I think things are better now at other services (and USB-C security keys exist), and I’m planning to redo a lot of my online accounts. I’m also getting a new phone soonish, so NFC will be an option. Just wondering if others find value in using them.

              • haui
                link
                fedilink
                18 months ago

                Understandable. I‘ve had a recent „near miss“ if you will and since then I thought I might wanna check my security as a whole. So maybe I‘ll end up with that as well.

                Is it possible to use generated keys as a login option on websites btw? I know its usable for ssh and git but i dont know about other sites. If you made one key for each site, they could never leak your password as they dont have it. Would be a ton of work though.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  28 months ago

                  That’s essentially what FIDO2 is (the security keys I’m talking about), but instead of public/private key, it’s challenge/response (similar enough security-wise). More and more services support it, but unfortunately the really important ones don’t (financial, government websites, etc). So you’re left with mostly social media and other tech sites.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    158 months ago

    Mostly yubikey users in here so shout out to fully open source SoloKeys.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        I use an OnlyKey and Mooltipass interchangeably. Prefer the lower tech OnlyKey. My passwords are half memorized passphrase and half random characters on the device. Only use for disk encryption, main account, and password manager.

    • Jae
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      Solokeys is a completely dead project at the moment.

      The last commit in their repos was well-over a year ago and they don’t respond to emails at all. I’d recommend against them for the time being.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    128 months ago

    I use a YubiKey and I like it. At this point the bulk of my 2FA is in ProtonPass, but for my work Microsoft 365 and Duo specifically it’s nice to default to it and I’m more likely to have it since it’s on my key ring, than my phone. Also nice to have stuff pointed to that rather than an app if you like to upgrade or wipe your phone frequently.

    I think most businesses that don’t provide work phones should be getting them for their employees so they don’t need to require that employee install an app on their personal device.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108 months ago

    In my opinion the biggest problem with hardware keys is what happens when you lose them. You have to either provision the keys yourself, putting the secret on your computer. Or you have to buy backup keys and make sure to register both with all your services. You’ll end up using your phone or password manager as a “backup.” And then that backup becomes your primary 2FA.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      Yeah this is the dichotomy I’m in. I have a yubikey, but obviously can’t afford to have all my eggs in one basket so every account I have the passkey on I also have 2FA setup with 2FAS Auth. Proton finally started storing passkeys tho so I’ll shift to that solution when I find the time.

    • haui
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      I‘m still working on my setup so your considerations are most helpful. What stands out to me is the option to use an airgapped old crappy laptop to provision the keys. Ideally one with manually disabled modems. That way nobody without physical access should be able to compromise it.

      Also, how can you provision your own hw keys?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98 months ago

    I have not used hardware keys, but if I were going to, I would want one that is open source hardware and software like the solo key.

    • haui
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      Thanks for the heads up! Great suggestion!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        No problem. I was looking into it at one point, but didn’t ultimately end up going through with it. Because of my password manager and OTP.

        • haui
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          Can relate. I‘m getting a bit fussy bc of the otp being on my phone and backup keys being spotty and stored indiscriminately atm. Any idea how to solve that without embracing the lock out scenario (storing the keys in a vault locked by one of the keys)?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            I just have my OTP secrets within my password manager. I know I know bad me, but in my defense my password manager is local only and is not stored in the cloud at all. My master password is also quite a long passphrase with special characters in it.

            • haui
              link
              fedilink
              28 months ago

              Okay, thanks for elaborating. My vault is also on my home network only with an insanely long password.

              But since someone tried breaking into my network recently I felt like I might need to harden up a bit.

              In a professional environment I would obviously be much more paranoid but my home server is for tinkering so I dont expect perfection.

              I would like a better setup for the vault and otp though. Like, if I store the admin otp key in the vault, I would be unable to retrieve it and get admin access which is bad. Theoretically, I could just store it in an encrypted file with the password stored in the vault.

              But I‘m not sure if that is best practice. With my backups I try my best for 3-2-1 backups procedure so I‘d love to make it easy and reproducible for myself.

              Long text, sorry. Thanks for reading.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88 months ago

    Yes, but its not supported on everything. I use Yubikeys since they support more interaction types. I personally use them to lock my more important things when I can. Like my password vault, financial sites, emails, accounts, etc.

    For the accounts that are whatever, less important I use OTP. You can also store a limited amount of OTP tokens on the Yubikey and use their open source software to view the codes.

    ALWAYS buy a backup if you do end up locking accounts with it, just in case you lose it. It is more secure than having a code saved digitally as you need the physical key to unlock things.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    தமிழ்
    58 months ago

    Last year Cloudflare had some offers to buy Yubikeys at half price. Bought two of them. Using these hardware keys is better than trusting phone to be single failure and getting locked out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You should always back up your OTP secrets, but I agree Yubikeys are a good choice. You can get USB A for $25. I think the Yubikey 5 grants you app access for an additional $25 or more? Pass.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        தமிழ்
        18 months ago

        What I did was to use keepass to store most of TOTP and use Yubikey to unlock it. Absolute critical ones like email is saved directly in Yubikey.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    https://onlykey.io/

    Built in hardware pin entry means your unlock code can’t be captured by a compromised machine. Emulates Yubikey if you need that, handles Fido / U2F, stores up to 12 passwords, acts as PGP and SSH key if you install the (open source) agent.

    The SSH agent implementation is forked from https://trezor.io/ which is advertised more for crypyo wallet uses.

    Edit: For OP’s concern about losing the key, it also has the ability to export an encrypted backup that can be restored to a replacement key

    • hash
      link
      28 months ago

      This is an interesting piece of kit, though I’m curious who the target market really is? Frankly I would be more comfortable regularly rotating my hardware security key’s password than I would be manually keying in my 2nd factors pin every time I need to use FIDO2 or TOTP. This would almost appear to be an excessive amount of security for me as an infosec professional which honestly makes me suspect it’s targeted towards a paranoid audience. Not that this wouldn’t have it’s applications. As a backup security key to be stored in a secure location this is definitely intriguing, but I can’t imagine using it on a daily basis.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        I think “unnecessarily over-the-top” is a key demographic in every market. Not a large one, but definitely present.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        I have one and I would not consider myself paranoid. I go to school part time and have to login with different accounts on rotating computers. It is nice to have a password manager I can plug into the PC instead of typing it off of my phone or having to memorize it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Manually keying in the pin is only needed when plugging in the device. Challenges for TOTP, FIDO2, etc. are a configuration option, and are only 3 digits if enabled (press any button if disabled).

        As for “excessive amount of security”, security as an absolute measure isn’t a great way to think about it. Use case and threat model are more apt.

        For use case, I’ll point out it’s also a PGP and SSH device, where there is no third party server applying the first factor (something you know) and needs to apply both factors on device.

        For threat model, I’ll give the example of an activist who is arrested. If their e-mail provider is in the country, they can compel the provider to give them access, allowing them to reset passwords on other more secure services hosted outside the country. The police now have the second factor (something you have), but can’t use it because it’s locked.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          If your usecase and threat model don’t require the pinpad, Onlykey Duo is worth a look. No pin, USB A or C, and still gives you 6 slots to support any combination of Fido2, TOTP, SSH, PGP, and password storage.

  • UnfortunateShort
    link
    48 months ago

    I want to add that you can not only use USB keys as second factors, but also as a password replacement on Linux and Windows. It is extremely convenient to press a button instead of typing a 16 character pw.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yup, my computers use full disk encryption and have long passwords (>15 characters). And those passwords are different from my login passwords. I find myself not shutting down as often because it’s a pain to log back in.

      So they’re cost competitive with Google Titan. I would go with the Yubikey in this case since they have a stronger track record, but I also don’t see much of a conflict of interest with Google (they don’t want your logins, they just want your Internet data).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 months ago

    I’m not an expert but the way I see it is this: if you’re tech-savvy and use common sense, they’re not necessary, as a 2FA app with TOTP along with random, strong passwords should be enough. I still use both for most things, only securing more sensitive stuff with a physical key.

    However, having one definitely can’t hurt, and if you’re passionate about cybersec, it’d be kinda strange if you didn’t have one.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    Yubikey bio has a fingerprint reader built into it. Which is very nice. Even if the device you’re using is compromised you will never expose your pin.

    The only key also has that advantage.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          It really depends on your thread model

          In my opinion the fingerprint won’t do any difference anyway

          Who are we protecting against?

          Hackers? They can’t press the button

          Thieves? They don’t have your pin

          Someone close who knows your pin? Maybe, but this is really an overkill

          Evil maid? If somebody can pull up evil maid attack, they can hack the fingerprint anyway

          Governments? They hack or force you to unlock it anyway


          Summary: my opinion is that fingerprint is an overkill which doesn’t protect from any real thread, but costs more and lacks some functions

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            If I compromise your system. I can record the pin. Then I just need to steal the device.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              Think, who are you, and who am i?

              I mean, how would you do it, and just why?

              This is a very very very improbable scenario, too complicated, and too unlikely

              There could be a thread model that would work with this feature well, but I don’t think any of us even theoretically is one of those people that would benefit from it

              Define your thread model, and work from it

              Most of the people have two main threads: hackers, and thieves, not hacker-thieves