(In the case that someone in Lemmy still use Google)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    926 months ago

    Here the funny part, google knew this shit would happen. How you ask? Well, see google has had this problem for a long time.

    When google first came out, there was all sorts of techniques you could use to boost your PageRank. Google had to tweak and tweak and tweak to fix it so that nazi sites would not come up when you looked up Jewish holocaust memorial museums for example.

    Seems they’ve learned nothing. And yet they’re still one of the biggest tech companies in the world.

    Scary. Let’s add AI to the mix now.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      126 months ago

      At least they haven’t used ChaosGPT for this.

      Lord and master, hear my call! I have need of Thee! from the spirits that I called Sir, deliver me!

      Goethe - The Sorcerer’s Apprentice

    • @minkymunkey_7_7
      link
      3
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Oh yes they learned. This is now a feature, not a bug. Google’s slogan changed long ago.

  • TFO Winder
    link
    fedilink
    576 months ago

    What to use for search engine. Even ddg is not giving reliable results.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      44
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If you believe Google is the most reliable, you can still use it in a private way via :

      • Startpage

      Startpage is a private search engine known for serving Google and Bing search results. One of Startpage’s unique features is the Anonymous View, which puts forth efforts to standardize user activity to make it more difficult to be uniquely identified. The feature can be useful for hiding some network and browser properties.

      https://www.startpage.com/

      SearXNG is an open-source, self-hostable, metasearch engine, aggregating the results of other search engines while not storing any information itself.

      There’s plenty of public instances too https://searx.space/

      Get Google search results, but without any ads, JavaScript, AMP links, cookies, or IP address tracking. Easily deployable in one click as a Docker app, and customizable with a single config file.

      Couple of public instances too. Basically SearxNG with ONLY google as a source. https://github.com/benbusby/whoogle-search#public-instances

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          That’s fair. Like the sibling comment says, it’s worth it for me. But not everyone has the ability to pay.

        • @FutileRecipe
          link
          -76 months ago

          The old saying goes: if you don’t pay for the product, you are the product.

          • @RGB3x3
            link
            English
            176 months ago

            Yeah, but $10 a month is a lot. And the $5 plan for only 300 searches a month goes by really fast if you have to do any kind of research for anything. Even for trying to figure out what brand of something to buy, you blow through those searches super quick.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              36 months ago

              Yup, I’d pay maybe $1. That’s way more than the ad revenue search engines get, so it’s a more than reasonable price to pay.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  36 months ago

                  Google’s ad search revenue amounted to 175 billion

                  That includes way more than search:

                  That “search and other” figure includes revenue generated on Google’s search properties, along with ads on other Google-owned properties like Gmail, Maps and the Google Play app store.

                  I couldn’t find a reliable source for a breakdown, so I’ll use Microsoft Bing statistics instead:

                  • $12.2B ad revenue in 2023
                  • ~1.3 billion unique visitors globally as of March 2023
                  • $9.66 Bing revenue per user

                  That last number is really close to my $1/month figure.

                  So something around $1/month range seems like a fair replacement for ad revenue for a search engine.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -16 months ago

                They’ve said that it costs them 1.5 cents to answer a search query, so that dollar a month wouldn’t go very far. I probably incidentally run 40-50 searches a day between my devices… $10 is a value that works for me.

                I’ve been using Kagi as my default since June, and don’t plan on stopping anytime soon.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 months ago

                  That sounds unlikely… But they’re a small search provider with a small customer base, so costs will be high maintaining all the infrastructure needed.

                  As I linked elsewhere, Bing makes ~$10 per user per year. That’s really close to my $1/month figure. And that’s revenue, which doesn’t count advertiser acquisition costs and whatnot.

                  I’m unwilling to pay $5/month for limited searches, but I’m willing to pay for search if it’s reasonable.

          • @MotoAsh
            link
            66 months ago

            That doesn’t mean the price has to be the same as a fucking Netflix subscription.

            Which service uses more computation? Streaming HQ video to millions of people, or running a search engine. Keep in mind, search engines have existed since basically before the internet in some form or another…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              Well, it costs Kagi about 1.5 cents to answer a search query. Consider how many searches you use in a month to determine how much they’re making off you at $10/mo.

              I’m lucky enough to be in a position to be able to pay for products that I use, instead of relying on freemium, or ad-supported, or data-mined, or pirated products. That hasn’t always been the case for me, so I don’t judge anyone for making a different choice.

              • @MotoAsh
                link
                -26 months ago

                If they’re taking in less than 1000 searches of money for 3000 searches, the numbers still aren’t adding up. Someone is misinformed or the product still.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      DDG queries can’t really be written the same way you’d write one in Google if you’re after effective results. It’ll take some time to get used to it, tbh I was using DDG alongside Google until I fully switched.

      • Pussista
        link
        fedilink
        126 months ago

        I keep reading that Google’s search results are supposedly much better than DDG’s when my experience is the exact opposite. I don’t even live in an English speaking country and the results I get are a vast improvement over Google’s. It has been this way for me since at least last year, but in my experience DDG had caught up to Google in 2022 already. It could also be that Google has just deteriorated a lot in the last two years (which it definitely has, judging by all the bad publicity they’ve been getting for it), so I’d urge you to give DDG/Brave Search/Bing/Kagi/SearxNG another chance.

        I’d also recommend setting an alternative of your choice as the default everywhere and to use it exclusively for like a week before making up your mind about that specific product!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            I’ve never used questions to search, I use keywords, even with Google. So if I want info on the Russia-Ukraine war, I’ll search “Russia-Ukraine War”. If I want casualty numbers, I’ll add “casualties” there, probably at the start if I want to emphasize it. Searching “how many people have died in the ukraine war” has never been something I do.

            That said, natural language search may be more useful with AI tools though, but for regular search, I’ve always used keyword-dense queries, roughly ordered by priority in the query (important terms first).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          56 months ago

          They probably mean grammar, since most Google operators do work. If there’s a specific difference in search syntax (other than bangs) though, I’d love to know what I’ve been missing.

      • @PunkiBas
        link
        26 months ago

        Whoa! You weren’t kidding about that list of search engines. What’s with the Germans and search engines? They sure do have a lot.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The author of th Thread is German, he icluded because of this also searches in German media sites or dictionaries. But if you want a German search engine, you can use MetaGer, not bad at all. Good privacy but freemium, in the free version there are ads, (context, anonymous) and limited on 2 search engines.

          • @PunkiBas
            link
            26 months ago

            Hah! I in fact have been using metager for a couple of months now as my defult search engine, since I saw it recommended in Lemmy those 2 months ago. Works great. Tried kagi before but I just don’t search that much and paying per search makes much more sense to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        Not sure who’s down voting you, its quite a valid option that, unlike google, is actually innovating in interesting ways.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Google: “Hey, do not be evil.”

    Google years later: "Can I has all the profits and personal data?”

    Google after that: " I am the Lizard Queen!"

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    176 months ago

    Scammers were already paying Bing and Google to have their sites above real ones.

    And now they’re paying to have google and bing have their AI to show scam websites above real ones.

    • Ricky Rigatoni
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      The same assholes riding a new horse and as usual everyone wants to blame the horse.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    146 months ago

    I…. Don’t really get why they think this is better. Google search was good…. Other companies can copy AI technology anyway. AI is really just predicting words and wasn’t designed for search, but their old algorithm was.

    Whyyyyyy

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 months ago

      My theory is that Google wants to move towards vector symbolic representations for pages in search rather than page caching. It would make index storage and retrival orders of magnitude cheaper for them if they can design a scheme that works well.

  • @9point6
    link
    14
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Way to go killing the golden goose there Google

  • @anon987
    link
    56 months ago

    So it operates exactly like Google search? Yall are surprised?

  • slazer2au
    link
    English
    36 months ago

    In a move that suprise la no one…

  • @Mango
    link
    36 months ago

    Also it doesn’t know shit about combos in super double dragon.

  • youmaynotknow
    link
    fedilink
    06 months ago

    Hell’s attorneys are seriously lacking. I’ve been waiting for them to sue Google for DMCA violations 🤣.

  • @big_slap
    link
    -16 months ago

    I have it on and use it just to see how terrible it is tbh, I get a laugh at how inaccurate it is every time 😂