Donald Trump posted a $175 million bond on Monday in his New York civil fraud case, halting collection of the more than $454 million he owes and preventing the state from seizing his assets to satisfy the debt while he appeals, according to a court filing.

A New York appellate court had given the former president 10 days to put up the money after a panel of judges agreed last month to slash the amount needed to stop the clock on enforcement.

The bond Trump is posting with the court now is essentially a placeholder, meant to guarantee payment if the judgment is upheld. If that happens, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee will have to pay the state the whole sum, which grows with daily interest.

If Trump wins, he won’t have to pay the state anything and will get back the money he has put up now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1199 months ago

    Long history of innocent poor people dying in jail because they couldn’t afford hundred(s), or thousand(s), dollar bail. Yet this proven rapist, fraudster, piece of crap gets his bond dropped by over 1/2 just because? His credit rating has to be shit. Fucking hell. What is the point of keeping this broken system?

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    959 months ago

    The bond Trump is posting with the court now is essentially a placeholder, meant to guarantee payment if the judgment is upheld.

    I’m curious as to how a $175M bond is supposed to guarantee a $454M judgment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      299 months ago

      The idea is the real estate isn’t going anywhere. It is technically not what the bond laws say is needed, but then this is a very large amount. This dude is being reamed and the state is not going to let him off the hook.

      It would be career suicide in NYC. Most of the city and metro area hate Trump’s guts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        They are letting him off the hook by not making him bond the whole amount.

        The amount was high because his fraud was high. Why does committing bigger crimes mean less proportionate punishment?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          199 months ago

          You have the right idea. Obviously they should have made him pay the full amount. I think they know he literally doesn’t have it.

          Remember, the state has a retired judge watching his bank accounts for a while now. They know what he can pay. $175 million in cash is better than them seizing his property quickly because that process is actually very slow.

          For everyone who thinks the state should just “take Trump Tower”, do you understand that’s not something they’re good at? They would need to find a buyer. You can’t just get a buyer for such a large building in a few days. They really would prefer cash for at least part of the fine.

          The building isn’t going anywhere and this doesn’t affect the judgement.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            259 months ago

            For everyone who thinks the state should just “take Trump Tower”, do you understand that’s not something they’re good at? They would need to find a buyer. You can’t just get a buyer for such a large building in a few days. They really would prefer cash for at least part of the fine.

            Then just take all his shit or admit the system can’t adequately punish the wealthy out loud instead of pretending that this is somehow a reasonable response to someone saying they can’t pay. They can seize regular people’s property after all.

            • @bostonbananarama
              link
              29 months ago

              Assume for a moment that the appeal comes back and overturns the judgment. Let’s even assume that it is a completely legitimate reason for it being overturned.

              How do you unwind taking that property and selling it? My understanding is that NY doesn’t have a redemption law for property that is levied and sold.

              The appeals court has to at least consider the possibility of legitimately overturning the case.

              • @IamtheMorgz
                link
                69 months ago

                Idk why you’re being down voted. I just watched a Legal Eagle video that pretty much described the change as being exactly related to this. If the appeal fails, he still owes the original judgement amount and if he doesn’t come up with the money they will seize some property. If the appeal works out for the orange man then they don’t have to try to undo a sale.

                Appeals courts are good things. And everyone, including that a-hole, is entitled to appeal.

                Now, it’s super annoying he can brag about having the money in public but argue in court he doesn’t, but hey, that’s our former president. Talks only out of his ass and never suffers any consequences from it.

                With any luck the appeal will fail miserably and he’ll still be on the hook for the full amount.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                39 months ago

                Who fucking cares? He is a rich asshole who committed blatant fraud and tried to overthrow the government and worst case is is slightly less wealthy than he was before court while the average person is flat broke from lawyer fees and their lives ruined from the same situation.

                Shilling for Trump should make you embarrassed.

                • @bostonbananarama
                  link
                  29 months ago

                  Who fucking cares?

                  About the rule of law? Obviously not you.

                  You want a specific action taken because you don’t like the person involved. Congratulations, you can replace Alito and Thomas when they get off the court. You are fine with changing the law to hurt the people you don’t like.

                  I on the other hand would prefer to preserve the rule of law. There are absolutely no downsides for the action taken by the appeals court, Trump posted $175 million Bond and the properties that they would have seized are still there to be seized in the future if necessary.

                  If the state levy and sells those properties, it is going to be a nightmare to try and unwind if the appeal were successful. In the meantime, if Trump did somehow sell those properties it would be a fraudulent conveyance, and those sales would be overturned. Other than hating Donald Trump (and I’m with you), there is no downside to this, but I’m not willing to destroy our legal system for him.

          • chingadera
            link
            229 months ago

            You have the right idea. Obviously they should have made him pay the full amount. I think they know he literally doesn’t have it.

            SO HE CAN GET FUCKED, ANY OF US WOULD BE FUCKED. I’m so tired of the acceptance.

          • @supamanc
            link
            119 months ago

            For everyone who thinks the state should just “take Trump Tower”, do you understand that’s not something they’re good at? They would need to find a buyer. You can’t just get a buyer for such a large building in a few days. They really would prefer cash for at least part of the fine.

            I think you don’t understand how asset forfeiture works. Trump tower is worth (reportedly) some $800m. The state seizes and sell it for the $500m he owes. They would find a buyer pretty quickly at that price. Any extra on top of the judgment amount is returned with compliments to Trump.

            • @baru
              link
              109 months ago

              I think you don’t understand how asset forfeiture works.

              I don’t understand. Still, from what I’ve read most of the buildings are anything but fully owned by Trump. And apparently that makes things difficult.

              • @supamanc
                link
                19 months ago

                Ah, well that’s an aspect I hadn’t considered!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        I bet he will want the interest on the posted money in case he gets his way and gets it back…

    • @baru
      link
      39 months ago

      I’m curious as to how a $175M bond is supposed to guarantee a $454M judgment.

      The appeals court lowered it to this amount. This could be a hint that the judge didn’t calculate the original amount correctly. Meidas Touch on YouTube did a video about it. I haven’t seen any good articles which repeat the same idea.

      • @Dkarma
        link
        49 months ago

        No they didn’t they lowered the amount he has to put up for an appeal

        • @baru
          link
          39 months ago

          No they didn’t they lowered the amount he has to put up for an appeal

          I replied to someone stating the same. You’re just repeating what has been said. I never said I wasn’t talking about the bond.

  • Yer Ma
    link
    fedilink
    579 months ago

    What about the other 300 million… We’re just going to let it slide, aren’t we?

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    559 months ago

    I’m sure that this same latitude would be given to any one of us, right?

    • @Etterra
      link
      79 months ago

      I have learned to not expect them for especially the orange idiot. I’ll believe he’s suffered then after he’s already done it.

  • @Buffaloaf
    link
    429 months ago

    “This is what we do at Knight Insurance, and we’re happy to do this for anyone who needs a bond,” said Hankey, who is best known in the business world for making high-risk, high-interest loans to car buyers with flawed credit histories.

    lmao

    • @RGB3x3
      link
      English
      189 months ago

      Trump is trading one payment for an even worse one. There’s no way Hankey doesn’t have an iron-clad contract to get back way more than Trump got.

      • @ArtVandelay
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        A contract is toilet paper to Trump. He’d happily renig on his part and start the courtroom shenanigans anew. After all what’s one more civil case?

  • ME5SENGER_24
    link
    399 months ago

    Fuck it; at this point stuff his face with Big Macs until he bursts! He’s never going to jail, so lets clog those arteries until we’re done with this shit stain

  • ConditionOverload
    link
    English
    309 months ago

    Nah they should’ve just given him even less to pay. Make it $10 total and give him another month to come up with the money. That’s what they just did.

    • OhStopYellingAtMe
      link
      509 months ago

      I’ll give you a hint. It rhymes with “Russian Oligarchs.”

      (Sorry, I couldn’t think of anything that rhymes with Russian Oligarchs, so I just said Russian Oligarchs)

      If you’re still stumped, it was Russian Oligarchs.

  • @phoneymouse
    link
    159 months ago

    Nothing but a free pass for this guy

    • @dogslayeggs
      link
      39 months ago

      He had to get his bond paid by someone else, in this case it was Knight Insurance.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -29 months ago

        I consider myself pretty broke and I don’t think I could convince anyone to give me nearly $200 million for bail.

    • @irreticent
      link
      19 months ago

      Your guess is wrong. It’s more likely a Russian oligarch bailed him out.