• Keith
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          Ublock doesn’t fully work but there are extensions to block ads on Photopea.

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Beyond it not being FOSS and requiring an Internet connection, ads are beyond a dealbreaker for me. I’d recommend the cost and effort of manually compositing with transparent film, lightbox, and cameras over anything with ads.

            Yeah, the dev has a right to make a living but there are better ways than contributing to the rot of the Internet and inserting vectors for malware into your software.

        • @mriormro
          link
          -4
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Oh no! Not a means for a sole developer of a robust, web-based photo editor to make some sort of a living.

          The fucking travesty of it all.

          Listen, it sucks that it’s not open source and that it is now ad-sponsored but the fact remains that there are shockingly poor FOSS alternatives to creative tools (blender is probably one of the few exceptions) and gimp is firmly in that ‘shockingly poor’ category.

          It’s okay to be critical of an open source project and use something that may be proprietary. The world isn’t going to blow up because of it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            76 months ago

            poor FOSS alternatives

            So you’d rather have ADs in place of a Layers panel?


            For those who can't read between the lines

            The fact that it has ADs, is also considered as one of the factors deciding its quality.
            And so is the fact that it can’t be run when the internet connectivity is slow/non-existent.
            Not considering those features as factors while judging the application just gives incentive to everyone else (including the prepaid ones) to include ADs in their UX.

            If this is how we promote them, soon, you’ll be seeing ADs (on top of the Subscription fees) in Adobe software.
            - Hard to believe? Look at Windows.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        66 months ago

        web-based photo and graphics editor.

        Photopea is advertising-supported software

        License: proprietary

        That’s a no from me dawg

        • @Spiralvortexisalie
          link
          English
          -16 months ago

          I am not mad at you, just disappointed that you did not start your own with Blackjack and Hookers.

  • @billbasher
    link
    356 months ago

    Actual X-ray of people who think brains show up in detail on X-rays

  • @Ironfacebuster
    link
    106 months ago

    Fun fact, some meme generator websites use HTML canvas to show you a preview

    Funner fact, you can right click on the canvas and select “copy image” to get a watermark free image (in my experience using imgflip at least)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      Firefox (idk about other browsers) also has a feature where you can right click the element on the website and directly make a screenshot just of this element, that should work as well.

  • @fastandcurious
    link
    96 months ago

    Never knew this was a thing, are people bothered by shit like that?

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        16 months ago

        Yes how weird it is to think effort should be prerequisite to posting

        • @EdibleFriend
          link
          26 months ago

          And here we have one of those weird people!

          There’s nothing wrong with having a little text down in the bottom corner.

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            16 months ago

            There’s nothing wrong with effort

            • @EdibleFriend
              link
              16 months ago

              lol im not getting drawn into this with one of you people.

              • @TrickDacy
                link
                06 months ago

                starts conversation

                “I’m not getting drawn into this!”

                • @EdibleFriend
                  link
                  26 months ago

                  There just really is no point. You have your opinions about levels of effort that must be put into shitposts, I simply could care less. So there is a watermark on a meme. At the end of the day it doesn’t matter to 99% of the people who see it so…why even argue about it being there?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      Yes. I use Ublock Origin to remove “social buttons” from websites just because it annoys me

  • @JusticeForPorygon
    link
    86 months ago

    Actual X Ray image of people who care about unobstructive watermarks

  • @50MYT
    link
    26 months ago

    For those pixel (may be all android ?) users wanting a super easy way…

    Make the meme, but before clicking generate, swipe to screenshot. You will get the android “do you want just the image” box which keys you copy/save without the watermark

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      Or on non-Google Android (which doesnt scan your screenshots lol) just take a screenshot and crop it.

      Fossify Gallery can do that.

      • @50MYT
        link
        06 months ago

        But android is Google…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Android is made by Google, but if you change small parts of it, it has no connections to it. Especially because they develop many parts as proprietary addons onto AOSP (Android open source project) like that strange screenshot crop thing. So no google apps = no tracking often.

              GrapheneOS changes a lot of the underlying stuff to degoogle too, but thats not that much.