• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      911 months ago

      I’ve been thinking about working Mon-Thu and Tue-Fri on alternate weeks so that every other weekend would be four days long. I think it would be better for me personally.

      • @jordanlundM
        link
        English
        511 months ago

        I could see that.

        Mon-Thur (Fri-Mon)
        Tue-Fri (Sat-Sun)

        So you’d never have WORSE than a normal weekend, but still get one day during the week to, I dunno, go to the DMV or get an oil change or whatever.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 months ago

      thats more or less what one of my coworkers does. the advantage is that after coming off a day off, people are more refreshed, rather than working all the days straight and slowing down as you approach the weekend.

      it sucks of course for vacation planning (less flexible) but its definitely better for mental/physical stress

  • @SpaceNoodle
    link
    English
    12
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Did ChatGPT write the title?

    • @arin
      link
      English
      711 months ago

      Garbage training, garbage output. Same with underpaid interns

    • @xantoxis
      link
      English
      73
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      When you let “each company do what’s best for them” we get mining companies hiring pinkerton to murder miners. We get Triangle Shirtwaist. We get Bhopal.

      We need the force of law behind things like this, or we get fucked by greed, every single time. You do what’s best for you, but corporations need laws.

        • @xantoxis
          link
          English
          5011 months ago

          OK. And what I’m telling you is that without a law, it won’t happen.

          How did I get from here to there? The 5-day work week literally saved lives. Saved peoples’ bodies. Extended lifespans. Gave children back their parents. I don’t think a single labor regulation has ever protected workers as much as the 5-day week.

          The 4-day week would take it further. It’s worth doing, and it will not happen if we let every corporation decide for themselves.

          • @jeffwOP
            link
            English
            511 months ago

            Just playing devil’s advocate here, but doesn’t the article prove that it has happened?

            And now, being a bit more genuine, I think it’s tricky with places where people aren’t salaried. Like people who make most of their money through commissions and bonuses based on sales targets (car salespeople, etc). Also caregiving, where margins are slim because of shitty insurance reimbursements and caregivers get paid based on hourly work

              • @jeffwOP
                link
                English
                1211 months ago

                Well, the idea behind the law is that you keep your current pay. I just think it’s impractical in situations where pay is driven by commission or where margins are cutthroat

    • ray
      link
      fedilink
      4111 months ago

      Good news! Nobody wants to cut your hours. Bernie Sanders’ proposal would cut the standard work week down from 40 hours to 32. Since you already work less than 32 hours per week, this change would have no impact on you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1411 months ago

      I think the thing is you are already working less than a 4 day week (32 hr … ) your doing 18 at most so I don’t think you really can comment on this one …

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          That’s the ponit same pay as 40 hr for 32 hr. . Better work/life balanced. I know it will not matter to you as you pick your hrs but there are a ton of people that are not that lucky… if they whant to work 40 nothing is stopping them the company will just have to pay 8hrs of overtime.

          The answer is more workers…

          • chiisana
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -611 months ago

            Would love to reduce the number of hours worked while retaining same comp. However, I don’t think more workers is a viable solution, because that’d imply companies eating the 20% extra cost. Whether or not they can get it through shareholders and the board aside, fact that the amount of working aged adults are shrinking (due to boomers retiring and lesser children in later generations) makes it much harder to add more head counts. There must be ways to improve efficiency without corporate/shareholder greed, and that’s a tough pill for the world to swallow without very drastic changes (UBI for example).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              611 months ago

              But there it is… if the top took a hiar cut that would cover it. Lower entrance requirements to get the job… means more eligible works… it’s a tuff one yes. Is there enuff workers maybe. But it’s worth a try.

              • chiisana
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -511 months ago

                I’m stuck in middle management, and have many middle and senior management peers, so I see both sides of the arguments here getting pushed back hard. I cannot begin to imagine the top willing to take a cut, there’s no benefit for them what so ever. Anything lower tries to justify will just be brushed off. On the flip side, I definitely do not want to reduce entrance requirements… bad hires hurts my team’s performance in non linear fashion.

                If meaningful changes were to happen, it would have to be mandated by laws and regulations, but I don’t see a path for those laws and regulations to change without drastic societal changes that would support such.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              911 months ago

              We don’t have a worker shortage we have a shortage of well paying jobs. If companies pay better than people will take the jobs… and that sucks she has to work so much has they try hiring at better wages or you know she could say no…

              • @jeffwOP
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I agree some of what you’ve said in this threat, but we 100% have a worker shortage. I work in healthcare and there just aren’t people out there with the qualifications we need. There are not enough doctors or nurses in the US. The govt funds a lot of healthcare education (nursing and medical schools). The govt isn’t expanding slots and schools often can’t find teachers anyway (for nursing anyway, not docs as much).

                The answer is obviously immigration, but that’s an ethical issue in healthcare. Bringing in people who want to be nurses and docs usually means taking them from developing nations. As the US population gets older and we have fewer young people, we just won’t have enough people working in healthcare.

    • @spez_
      link
      English
      -3011 months ago

      I agree. The government should not get in the way of companies - no matter what.

      • @jeffwOP
        link
        English
        1211 months ago

        Did you drop the /s?

        • @Landless2029
          link
          English
          511 months ago

          Some people just drink the kool-aid