• Lad
    link
    fedilink
    135 months ago

    We already had the Cuban missile crisis before, we don’t need this shit again. This time it might go differently.

  • sylver_dragon
    link
    English
    115 months ago

    While I can understand Poland’s desire to have nuclear weapons available, this seems like it would be a really provocative step towards Russia. Nuclear weapons positioned that close to Russia will raise the threat of a nuclear first strike against Russia. Even without an unstable strongman in charge of Russia, it’s easy to see how a Russian government would be uncomfortable with this. At the same time, with an unstable strongman in charge of Russia, the provocation may not matter. Putin has proven he is willing to invade his neighbor and slaughter thousands, without provocation. So, I’m sure Poland isn’t as worried about provocation as they are defense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      175 months ago

      While I can understand Poland’s desire to have nuclear weapons available

      Available to whom? Do you think he meant nonexistent Polish nukes? Or maybe USA ones which will be entirely outside Poland control.

  • @shneancy
    link
    105 months ago

    Duda said it? Yeah let’s just ignore that

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    85 months ago

    Unnecessary, there is nothing Poland can offer that isn’t already guaranteed by an Ohio class submarine

  • @JesusSon
    link
    75 months ago

    “Watch this, imma fuck with Putin real quick.”

  • @bigpEE
    link
    -85 months ago

    Cool, let’s let them. Poland’s a strong ally in Europe. I don’t see a downside

      • @bigpEE
        link
        -15 months ago

        Countries that have nukes don’t get invaded. Simple as

        • @AEsheron
          link
          6
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          This isn’t the same. Host nukes is not owning nukes, they seems to be proposing housing US nukes that Poland would not have control of, or be able to launch. With no launch codes, they aren’t a valid deterrent to conventional war, unless the world is convinced the US would use them to protect Polish sovereignty, which would obviously not be on the table.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            There’s no way USA would ever let Russia (or any other enemy) even near the nukes in Poland.

            So really hosting USA’s nukes provides a double guarantee for help in case of invasion on top of NATO

          • @bigpEE
            link
            -35 months ago

            How many countries owning or hosting nukes have been invaded?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      it’s a mirror of “Cuba is a strong ally in the West, let’s let them have nukes. What could go wrong”

      • @bigpEE
        link
        -55 months ago

        Nothing did go wrong, though. If you’re saying there was a close call, that’s true, but Russia doesn’t have the ability to threaten a conventional response. And no one gets nuked for moving nukes around; look at Belarus.