• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    857 months ago

    And if he doesn’t, thats a “loss” for some reason. Nothing is actually lost mind you, there is no 7.5 trillion pounds of baby meat in a dump somewhere.

    • Final Remix
      link
      English
      53
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Nevertheless, we’ve fired the CEO and given him 6 billion pounds of baby meat for failing.

      • @Got_Bent
        link
        English
        357 months ago

        And he gets another sweet gig with another big company because he’s got “experience”

    • lad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      127 months ago

      It was a loss because the CEO had already received an MBO in percentage of planned growth

      • @takeda
        link
        English
        77 months ago

        Reminds me of the Reddit CEO who was sobbing that Reddit is not profitable (and that’s why they had to block 3rd party apps) while receiving a $200 million salary.

  • lad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    My calculations show that around the age of 80 he will be massive enough to turn earth into a black hole if evenly distributed onto its volume

    Edit: actually by the age of 30, because I misread the current age to be 12 months

      • lad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        Positively, probably, as the stock will get to the moon literally and long before that moment

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      If that’s with it evenly distributed, then with all that weight as a virtual point source due to the difference in size between the baby and Earth, wouldn’t the baby collapse to its roche limit even faster? And as long as it’s not a kuggleblitz (that’s def not spelled right) black hole it would quickly consume the Earth and grow even larger, right?

      • lad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        Yes, but then we would better use human body density to determine the size of an object, it’s not going to be realistically (lol) a point source anyway and will take longer to become a black hole, I think 🤔

  • @Treczoks
    link
    English
    207 months ago

    They also expects if a woman can give birth to a baby in nine months, nine women only need one month to “produce” a baby. Or even just eight or seven women, because of synergy effects.

  • mechoman444
    link
    English
    197 months ago

    These people think the only kind of growth is exponential.

    • lad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77 months ago

      Because they don’t know anything that grows faster than exponential, and anything that grows slower doesn’t look as good in the reports

      • mechoman444
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Slower growth is worse than faster growth. I want 10 million next week not next year.

        This kind of capitalism is a disease.

  • @radicalautonomy
    link
    English
    15
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    6 lbs., 13 oz. at birth for anyone wondering.

    7.5 trillion = 7.5x10^12

    40 three-month intervals in 10 years

    P = Pounds at birth

    P x 2^40 = 7.5x10^40

    P = 7.5x10^40 / 2^40

    P ≈ 6.82 lbs.

    P ≈ 6 lbs., 13 oz.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    English
    137 months ago

    Now, if that isn’t some sound empirical reasoning, I don’t know what is!