• slazer2au
    link
    English
    912 months ago

    they’ve created a drive powered by a “New Force” outside our current known laws of physics, giving the propellant-less drive enough boost to overcome gravity.

    Right…

    • @warmaster
      link
      522 months ago

      It’s true. Here’s a copy of their research paper:

      Sure, here’s what your research paper could look like:

      Title: Unveiling a Novel Force: Propelling Beyond Gravitational Constraints

      Abstract: This paper investigates a newly hypothesized force that enables propellant-less drives to defy gravity. Examining experimental anomalies and theoretical speculations, it explores potential mechanisms and applications, signaling a transformative leap in space exploration and transportation technology.

      But as an AI model, I don’t know shit and come up with bullshit out of my synthetic ass.

    • @bigbadmoose
      link
      312 months ago

      New Force isnt as good bring back “Force Classic” 😤

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 months ago

        Ikr? It already comes in four different flavours! (Five if you count the Star Wars Edition, but that was just a marketing gimmick.)

    • @RedditWanderer
      link
      102 months ago

      Obviously Buhler’s claims are pretty “woah, if true,” but the history of propellant-less drives is filled with seemingly positive results that are eventually dashed upon the rocks of scientific reality.

      “Big if true”

    • @atx_aquarian
      link
      122 months ago

      The secret is to throw yourself at the ground and miss.

    • The Assman
      link
      fedilink
      182 months ago

      Produces 1g thrust but requires hard-vacuum

      enough boost to overcome gravity

      Make it make sense

      • @decerian
        link
        312 months ago

        Gravity and vacuum are not mutually exclusive - you always have to deal with gravity forces, although they become negligible pretty quickly when you get into and then leave orbits.

        As to the specific claim, I suspect that the experiments they are currently doing (in vacuum chambers on earth) have gotten to the point that they are measuring the propulsion system producing more thrust than it’s own weight (T/W >1), which would technically be enough thrust to overcome gravity. Even if it wasn’t practically useful for actually getting to orbit, that amount of thrust on a reactionless motor would be incredible, and would totally unlock the solar system for us.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          they become negligible pretty quickly when you get into and then leave orbits.

          You’re not wrong, but it’s worth noting that in low earth orbit (e.g. typical ISS orbiting altitude) earth’s gravity is still 90% as strong as at sea level. Astronauts on the ISS are weightless not because they escaped earth’s gravity, but because they’re continuously falling.

        • El Barto
          link
          02 months ago

          it’s own weight

          its* own weight.

        • El Barto
          link
          12 months ago

          The… vomit comet?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            If I remember right that is the slang term for a device used to simulated high force situations astronauts are expected to experience. So named for the frequent effect

            • El Barto
              link
              12 months ago

              Oh, interesting! Thanks for explaining.

              • Fuck spez
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                It’s so much more interesting than the parent comment makes it out to be, though. In case you didn’t already read anything about it, it’s an ordinary (on the outside) jet that flies in parabolic arcs which at a certain point lets the passengers experience microgravity and float around the modified cabin for a minute or so at a time. Anyone can go for a ride last I checked… if you have several thousand dollars laying around, anyway.

        • @Dkarma
          link
          -12 months ago

          So in theory if you built a vacuum tube from the earths surface to “space” and sealed it at both ends you could have a frictionless elevator

          • El Barto
            link
            12 months ago

            I mean… sure. But you could do the same from the surface of Earth to the height of the Eiffel tower. Or my uncle Bob’s third floor apartment.

      • magic_lobster_party
        link
        fedilink
        232 months ago

        Counterpoint: Another ex NASA employee invented Super Soaker, so there’s some weight in this

    • @davidgro
      link
      122 months ago

      Much of the same could be said of the EmDrive. This is one of those extraordinary claims which requires extraordinary evidence, especially given the recent history of the topic.

  • Boozilla
    link
    English
    27
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I just want an Aluminum Falcon.

    I assume I won’t be able to afford the Millennium edition.

  • @breadsmasher
    link
    English
    252 months ago

    I do wonder why we never ask why they are former NASA / Blue Origin / SpaceX whatever. Did they try to bring up some crazy idea and let go? Did they just lose it?

    Im always hopeful for new breakthroughs but always sceptical

    • @NocturnalMorning
      link
      142 months ago

      People leave companies for all sorts of reasons. There’s politics at every job.

  • @Geek_King
    link
    202 months ago

    It’d sure be nice if some break through like this was realized. But when you have a company to greatly benefit from this “impossible discovery”, hard to stay optimistic it isn’t some grift.

  • @NocturnalMorning
    link
    11
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    After reading the article, and doing a little digging on this I can confidently say this article is utter garbage. You can look up the patent application on this, it’s something to do with electrostatic forces which is a well known area of physics. Nothing magical about it.

    For anyone curious, someone was kind enough to post the summary of the patent in this thread https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=60131.0

    • El Barto
      link
      22 months ago

      Did anyone claim it was magic?

      • @NocturnalMorning
        link
        92 months ago

        The article author claimed it was some undiscovered force in physics, so kinda yeah. It’s completely misrepresenting what it is.

        • El Barto
          link
          -42 months ago

          But an undiscovered force is not magic either. However, I understand what you’re saying now.

  • @superfes
    link
    42 months ago

    Very interesting, and a very very terrible web page.

  • @foggy
    link
    -1
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Disappearances come after the patents get filed.

    • exscape
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      Why would anyone want to kill him if this were true? It would be a dream for NASA and everybody else working in space flight.

      FWIW I’d bet almost anything this will be as useful as the EmDrive.

      • @Delta_V
        link
        22 months ago

        If someone already quietly had similar tech maneuvering their satellites, and wanted to remain the only actor with eyes in the sky that can’t be shot down or eventually chased down due to lack of fuel.

  • @foggy
    link
    -72 months ago

    How long til they disappear?

    • @davidgro
      link
      92 months ago

      It will disappear when nobody else can replicate and it becomes clear that it never really worked to begin with.

    • MxM111
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      He was claiming that he invented this by more than 10 years…