• themeatbridge
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 years ago

    Isn’t the crux of his defense that it isn’t true, so he wouldn’t have bothered paying for her silence, and Cohen did it on his own?

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        That last bit is the actual crux of it. Whether the deed was a crime or not, it’s the coverup that gets you the time.

        The coverup gets you the time because in this case he’s being charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records, not for paying a pornstar as part of an NDA.

        I can almost see Trump’s point on this though - the specific details of their sexual encounter (like whether or not he used a condom) are more or less irrelevant to what he’s charged with. That the sexual encounter occurred and that she was being paid not to disclose it is the only really relevant part from her.

        • Dkarma
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          She didn’t go into details tho. Her story is absolutely valid to give legitimacy to her claims he paid her to shut up.

    • cogman
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      The crux of the defense is “nuh-uh” and to delay ideally until Trump can pardon himself or he dies.

  • kescusay
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    He can “demand” whatever he wants. What he’s gonna get is a fair trial, followed by a verdict from a jury of his peers.

    And that’s the last thing he wants, because he’s so fucking guilty.

    • gac11
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      You just triggered a thought that 12 people now have to say they’re Trump’s peer

  • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    But they didn’t object to it during the testimony because they wanted to argue for a mistrial