It’s the deepest Ukrainian drone strike of the war, so far

A month after Ukraine began bombarding targets inside Russia with explosives-laden sports planes modified for remote flight, one of the do-it-yourself drones has struck an oil refinery in the city of Salavat, more than 800 miles from the front line of Russia’s wider war on Ukraine.

It is, by far, Ukraine’s longest-range raid—and an escalation of Ukraine’s deep-strike campaign targeting Russian refineries, factories and strategic military sites.

And it’s at least the fourth attempted deep strike involving Ukraine’s sport-plane drones. Videos shot by people on the ground in Salavat clearly depict the wide straight wings, fixed wheels and propeller that are typical of an inexpensive sport plane, the kind a middle-class pilot can build at home from a kit costing as little as $90,000.

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    English
    142
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I thought maybe the thumbnail was just some generic small plane, but nope. That’s the same model that keeps making successful attacks in Russia. The Aeroprakt A-22. That little prop plane. Top speed 127 mph/204 kph. That’s what Russia can’t find and shoot down.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4724 days ago

      Which is most effective at evading Russian air defense? The F-35, an exquisitely designed $110M jet with among the best stealth that Lockheed Skunkworks can create, or the Ukrainian equivalent of a Cessna trainer aircraft?

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        1223 days ago

        Depends heavily on what air defense it’s stacked against and who coordinated the mission.

        Low speed, low altitude aircraft are excellent at evading higher end air defenses, particularly if you’ve scouted out the anti-air surveillance in advance.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1023 days ago

          Riminder the Bismarck wasnt critically damaged by top of the line aircraft, it was sunk by a bunch of biplanes which were effectively immune to its AA.

          • @UnderpantsWeevil
            link
            English
            923 days ago

            A great example, setting aside the fact that battleships have always been more trouble than they were worth.

            Although, modern aircraft carriers are approaching that kind of outdated-ness. I’m genuinely curious to see what happens when America loses it’s first $50B floating fortress.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              523 days ago

              Battlships filled roughly the same position heavy tanks once filled, big heavy hitters that could take a beating. But with the march of progress came their downfall, that and the adoption of different fleet tactics.

              I suspect that the big Carriers will be replaced with something more akin to smaller carriers, kinda like what Japan uses. Though those are definitely just destroyers no carriers here. But yeah with VTOL large aircraft carriers will most likely end up being decommissioned or turned into portable hospitals or soemthing specifically the nuclear ones.

            • @thebestaquaman
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Saying they were always more trouble than they were worth is a bit of a miss though: They completely dominated for a period, to the point where entire columns would be redirected or kept in port if intelligence arrived saying that a certain battleship had left port and was on the hunt.

              As for the “modern” aircraft carrier: I think it will remain viable until we see a fundamental paradigm shift in how naval warfare is conducted. A carrier is at the centre of a carrier strike group, and is probably one of the most well protected places on the planet at any time, and can move at over 40 knots. I have a hard time imagining what could locate and take out an alert carrier in reasonable distance from shore, other than another carrier group.

              • @UnderpantsWeevil
                link
                English
                121 days ago

                I have a hard time imagining what could locate and take out an alert carrier in reasonable distance from shore, other than another carrier group.

                Bombers and long range torpedos spring to mind, particularly when the carrier is moving through a relatively right corridor, like the Red Sea.

                The Houthis have already functionally shut down the Suez against commercial traffic just by threatening from the coast. And they’re employing relatively unsophisticated artillery.

                • @thebestaquaman
                  link
                  English
                  320 days ago

                  I specified “a reasonable distance from shore” because an important part of the point of a carrier is exactly that it can stay easily 100 km from shore and still strike far inland. If a carrier is in range of shore-based torpedoes, they’ve likely messed up long ago.

                  As for bombers: They’re historically the major threat to carriers, but I don’t see any modern developments that make modern bombers any more of a threat to modern carriers than WW2 era bombers were to WW2 era carriers.

      • @ryrybang
        link
        English
        2224 days ago

        Similar, yeah. More modern construction and side-by-side seating instead of tandem. But otherwise, similar size and weight.

    • Rickety Thudds
      link
      fedilink
      English
      424 days ago

      They must have done something to it, because Wikipedia puts its max range as 680 miles.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1424 days ago

        Empty weight 260 kg. So a normal Pilot 70-80 kg adds 25-30% weight on top. Plus the weight for seat, steering wheels etc. So with a small payload they probably safe quite some weight.

        • @soEZ
          link
          English
          1224 days ago

          Plis adding extra fuel tanks in spota for cargo/pilot etc. prob helps and striping it off anything unnecessary like seats breaks etc…

        • Rickety Thudds
          link
          fedilink
          English
          524 days ago

          We aren’t talking about the weight of the payload though. Don’t you need a fairly hefty bomb to meaningfully damage a refinery?

          If the answer is no, I would love to see this strategy implemented in a longer ranged plane. Russia’s main tank production factory is about 2000 miles from the nominal Ukrainian border.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            Total weight is crucial for how far a plane can fly. So - Pilot weight + Payload weight needs to be considered.

            In terms of damage, if you hit the right spot without redundancies you can shut down or severely limit operations of a plant even with only a small material damage. Even if there is no visible damage, reducing the structural integrity of pressure pipes and the like can force a shutdown of that equipment until the damage is properly investigated.

            In 2019 Houthis successfully attacked two Saudi refineries with a small swarm of drones, forcing a shutdown.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abqaiq–Khurais_attack

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            623 days ago

            A refinery has a tank with millions of liters of gasoline. It already has the bomb. All you really need is a penetrator and an igniter.

          • @gmtom
            link
            English
            224 days ago

            From the pictures on twitter damage seems pretty minimal.

          • @UnderpantsWeevil
            link
            English
            -123 days ago

            Don’t you need a fairly hefty bomb to meaningfully damage a refinery?

            Depends on where you drop it.

            But otherwise, the headline is almost certainly overstated. It makes for some sexy war propaganda, though.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              223 days ago

              It does also show Russia that Ukraine is capable of bypassing their defenses and successfully attacking infrastructure (or military installations/encampments) several hundred kilometers inside Russia.

              And doing it multiple times.

              • @UnderpantsWeevil
                link
                English
                122 days ago

                Ukraine is capable of bypassing their defenses

                That’s never been in doubt. It’s been a war of attrition from day one.

                The extended range in a gonzo mission is notable precisely because it’s so desperate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6224 days ago

    If Ukraine told me I could bring my own drone over there and blow up an oil refinery in Russia, I’d schedule a vacation.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      523 days ago

      Large scale long range highly clandestine professional military operation -> Headline: Guy With Children’s Toy (and tons of military grade explosive) Just Defeated Russia!

      :-/

  • @Raptor_007
    link
    English
    4924 days ago

    This is kind of news I like to read. Go Ukraine!

  • @T00l_shed
    link
    English
    4423 days ago

    Slava Ukraini, give them hell.

      • ArxCyberwolf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3223 days ago

        The Russian invaders don’t want to die? Then get the fuck out of Ukraine and stay out!

        Run along back to Russia now, comrade with a brand new account that definitely wasn’t just made for trolling and bad faith arguments.

      • @Agrivar
        link
        English
        1123 days ago

        Removed by mod

        • @jordanlund
          shield
          M
          link
          English
          020 days ago

          Don’t feed the trolls, report them. Comment removed for civility.

        • @AngryCommieKender
          link
          English
          1123 days ago

          Russia troll is not comrade. Troll is troll. Comrade fights trolls and bourgeoisie.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        323 days ago

        What are you a Seventh Day Adventist? Take your pacifism snd shove it! Blood for the tree of liberty! KILL KILL KILL!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3024 days ago

    The raids have somewhat throttled Russian gasoline production, but probably not enough to have an immediate impact on the economy—and thus on the long-term war effort. “These are spot strikes,” energy expert Hennadii Rіabtsev told Ukrainian Pravda. “They are painful and affect logistics, but they do not significantly impact annual total refining volumes.”

    What? I thought they have reduced their oil refining? Not to mention, they’ve started to restrict oil exports(refined oil i believe) since these attacks have taken place all while increasing their unrefined oil exports. It feels like this is actually causing an impact, though definitely not something that directs directly to the front line, but this is long term damage and will make it harder for Russia to generate money.

  • Jeena
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2424 days ago

    How come they can’t shoot it down before it arrives?

    • @Thrashy
      link
      English
      96
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      They’re flying these in very low and slow, which is hard for SAM radars to detect and lock on to unless you’re right up next to them – and once they’re past the front lines Russia doesn’t have many (if any) point defense installations.

      In fact I imagine that the economic impacts of these attacks may be a secondary goal, and the main intent is actually to force Russia to pull SAM systems off the front line and redeploy them across the Russian interior to defend facilities they thought were safely out of Ukraine’s reach. The fewer defenses on the front line, the more capable Ukraine’s air force is to support efforts on the ground.

      • @ghostdoggtv
        link
        English
        2524 days ago

        Ukraine playing pro dota and forcing dire to ward their own jungle.

        Ideally, they redeploy and still can’t shoot the fuckers down lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4724 days ago

      Russia’s air defense had a backbone of Cold War era tech before the war started. Ukraine has been consistently plinking away at it. Most of it is naturally positioned near borders to prevent penetration. If you sneak past the coverage thins out quickly. Russia is a huge country so it’s also understandable to not have high density coverage throughout.

      At one point Russia had a great setup. But that time was long ago. And oil money going to modernization efforts means less yacht money. Air defense also isn’t that critical when you’re mostly concerned about beating up on small countries like Georgia and Chechnya that can’t fight back.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1324 days ago

      I imagine it’s too small, and perhaps made mostly of plastic and/or wood, so they might not show up on radar

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Wood generally has enough water in it to show up on radar. Otherwise, there wouldn’t be a point to expensive composite materials for stealth.

        It’s made of mostly metal, though.

        • @Everythingispenguins
          link
          English
          523 days ago

          Too bad I would have loved to see a nice oak framed fighter jet. We could even skin it with a nice thin birch ply. Put on a little wood oil and a ceramic top coat. That would be a great looking machine. Plus the Amish could become defensive contactors.

      • @Agrivar
        link
        English
        623 days ago

        Removed by mod

        • @jordanlund
          shield
          M
          link
          English
          020 days ago

          Don’t feed the trolls, report them. Comment removed for civility.

  • @TokenBoomer
    link
    English
    2123 days ago

    That moment when anti-imperialism and climate activism align.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      123 days ago

      Idk about the fallout of exploding chemical refineries, especially explosives and fuel, but yeah it might be good long run if we cripple the industry.

    • @curious_betsy
      link
      English
      24
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      On 24 November 1989, while doing his obligatory community service (Zivildienst) as an orderly in a West German hospital, Rust stabbed a female co-worker who had rejected him.

      ffs

    • @ClanOfTheOcho
      link
      English
      724 days ago

      I thought the exact same thing! At the time, I’d heard rumors that the entirety of USSR’s air defense was smoke and mirrors. This isn’t helping to refute those decades old rumors, if there is anything to refute.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        524 days ago

        It is also possible that they chose not to shoot down the plane back then, because they didn’t want a third world war and it became clear not to be a war plane.

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      424 days ago

      The difference there is that it didn’t cross the border of a country where Russia was in the middle of an active invasion.

  • @Noodle07
    link
    English
    623 days ago

    One more down, how many left?