• @AdamEatsAss
    link
    English
    877 months ago

    It’s almost like a 100 page website TOS is meaningless.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    717 months ago

    The crux of it is

    If X owned the data, it could perhaps argue it has exclusive rights to control the data, but then it wouldn’t have safe harbor.’ if you own it you don’t get section 230 protection.

    This judge is also the one who stomped Oracle, in Oracle vs Google

    • @jeffwOP
      link
      English
      36 months ago

      Interesting, didn’t know that about the judge! Or maybe I just skimmed that part of the article lol

  • gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    277 months ago

    As if a judge’s ruling ever mattered to musk

    The cunt

  • @NeoNachtwaechter
    link
    English
    267 months ago

    Technically it is a “Judge says” post, but they still made it look like one of the old “Elon says” posts

  • @Shady_Shiroe
    link
    English
    127 months ago

    Musk gotta cut back on that weed, or whatever he is smoking

    • @jeffwOP
      link
      English
      127 months ago

      His drug of choice is ketamine. Fuck me, why do I know that?

        • @jeffwOP
          link
          English
          57 months ago

          Sure… but why do I just know that? He’s just some random ass celeb. Why is that fact stored in my memory?

          • poo
            link
            English
            47 months ago

            I wouldn’t even grace him with “celeb” - you only know anything about Musk because he’s a gigantic aloof piece of shit lol

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              I LITERALLY only know Elon is because of the media, and the fact he pops up on X all the time, to every user I assume.