It’s an older article, sir, but it checks out.

  • @moistclump
    link
    English
    349 months ago

    Goss added: “There was probably some really, really important information in these documents.”

    When asked by a reporter if the black ink was meant to intentionally obscure, Goss countered, “Good God, why?”

    Goss lamented the fact that the public will probably never know the particulars of such historic events as the Cold War, the civil-rights movement, or the growth of the international drug trade.

    “I’m sure the CIA played major roles in all these things,” Goss said. “But now we’ll never know for sure.”

    Lmfao, the onion is so good at what it does.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      219 months ago

      Yeah I saw that posted earlier. Still can’t believe Google hasn’t turned that off yet.

      • @CobblerScholar
        link
        English
        229 months ago

        Google is just terrified that a good AI will come along and they won’t own it so they’ll leave it up as long as AI is still a buzzword

        • Flax
          link
          fedilink
          English
          89 months ago

          Quite sad they didn’t have this mindset for Stadia. That was a good business idea and I can see it working in the future

  • ArgentCorvid [Iowa]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    159 months ago

    Lol.

    A couple years ago someone at work asked me if I had a highlighter, and handed them a sharpie.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    109 months ago

    God damn, I ate the onion today. In my defence, I thought they had used black highlighters instead of black alcohol ink pens or something like that, like a procurement issue, before I clicked the link and realized I’ve been bamboozled.

  • @LemmyKnowsBest
    link
    English
    29 months ago

    LOL yeah they meant to HIGHLIGHT all the interesting stuff, not black it out 😂

    I just wanted to state the obvious, explain the satire, because it’s funny