• @Gigan
    link
    647 months ago

    Pretty close except scandinavia. It’s a mess up there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      597 months ago

      I think it’s just not aligned, they didn’t get the scale perfect. That pointy bit over the ocean and the bit hanging down from it are actually pretty close to right, just need to be moved over and twisted a bit.

      All in all, I don’t think I could do any better.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      217 months ago

      It was a mess up here, yeah! My home county, Telemark, was just a white spot with a lake in the middle on most maps at that time.

      Since the Middle Ages, and when Norway was first mapped in the 17th century, Telemark had only been a white spot on the map, that is to say, no so-called learned person had traveled through the region, and the area was mostly unknown to people in the cities and along Coast. The Telemark farmers had a reputation for being quarrelsome and ‘bloodthirsty’ and would not go out of their way to kill both priest and bailiff if it suited them. The hand ax was in frequent use and the knife was loosely in the sheath!

      Jeez.

  • @Reddfugee42
    link
    297 months ago

    Holy shit my brain had a tough time with realizing that the normal map thing where the light part is land and the dark part is water isn’t what’s happening here 😅

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      Fuck, I only realized this after your comment. I kept turning my phone all different ways to try to see Europe.

    • Fonzie!
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      For me it’s the opposite, so I sometimes get confused with maps using light for land and dark for sea, although those are rare

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      Me too, was having a hard time recognizing anything until I started looking at the “water.”

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      257 months ago

      Had the Netherlands already started getting land back from water in the 16th century?

        • @grue
          link
          English
          67 months ago

          How’d that get its name? It sounds almost like a corruption of French “acheter mer” (“to buy sea”).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Achter means in a local sense ‘at the back’ or ‘behind’ and meer means either ‘more’ or means ‘sea’ (e.g. IJsselmeer).

            So it referrs to either “more land behind” the city of Alkmaar or or a sea behind the city.

            • @Bashnagdul
              link
              47 months ago

              Lake, meer means lake. Achtermeer is best translated as back lake, or behind lake. Assuming achter in this case is used as this. It could also mean the lake of Acht. Since Acht could also be the name of a location. See Markermeer.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                TY. Funny how German and Dutch switch meaning here:

                • meer – der See
                • zee – das Meer, die See.
          • Bob
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 months ago

            Achter is like aft or after (as in behind); meer is like mere (as in a lake). Aftermere would be an English bastardisation of the name.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        157 months ago

        I think what @[email protected] means is that on the Ottoman map you kinda get France, and then directly on the coastline right north of France you get Jutland. It’s sorta like if you took Europe and did a ripple cut to remove the Netherlands out of it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yup! That’s what it looks like to me! After Denmark you get Sweden and Norway, and they’re easy to close to the UK!

  • @niktemadur
    link
    247 months ago

    What kind of projection is being used? Because each type of map geometry distorts elements, such as the way Greenland looks huge on the Mercator maps.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      87 months ago

      It’s the Mercator projection. The map behind it is just a normal map we’re used to seeing since it matches up fairly well it must be the same projection.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s noticeable different at the top though, so I doubt they were using the same projection as us.

        • @HereIAm
          link
          77 months ago

          The geography itself is mapped completely differently, I assume they just didn’t make many expeditions that far north.

    • aname
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      It’s called Great Glen Fault and it is almost a straight line through scotland, although way farher up north

  • geogle
    link
    137 months ago

    What’s really interesting is the mild longitudinal shifts while latitudes are really good. No doubt this was in large part because we can use the direction of the sun and stars to get North or South, but for east or west you were much more dependent on precision timekeeping.

  • @Insig
    link
    English
    77 months ago

    Ireland no longer looks like a teddy bear, but some sort of bottle opener :/

    • Match!!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      Holland hadn’t reclaimed its land from the Spatial Sea yet

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    37 months ago

    I’m not sure why Island appears to have been hit by an asteroid?