• Chainweasel
    link
    English
    237 months ago

    Anything is anonymous if you register with a fake name and email.

    • Goat
      link
      fedilink
      327 months ago

      That is pseudonymity, not anonymity

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        But it really is equivalently pseudo-anonymous. Both are leaking equal amounts of info, assuming the fake email is only used for the one account.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    20
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Looks like Slashdot no longer allows Anonymous Cowards. TIL.

    (I’m not editorializing — that’s what you’d show up as if you posted anonymously.)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    137 months ago

    There are dozens, maybe hundreds of chans alone, and that’s just one style of message board.

  • QuentinCallaghan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77 months ago

    In case of 4chan it’s obviously other anonymous imageboards. There doesn’t seem to functionality in Lemmy that would allow for posting without accounts.

    • Andrew
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Accounts (which contain the private key that signs the headers in your posts, and the public key to verify) are required for ActivityPub to work.

    • whoareuOP
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      hmm, maybe I should open an issue on github about it? however it will make moderating communities difficult.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        57 months ago

        Not possible really. The protocol Lemmy uses requires accounts, not only as a soft requirement, but the software your instance would be interacting with requires it to function.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          It could always use an “anonymous” pseudo-account, (ie, have anonymous posts federate as [email protected]), or a pseudo-account per post ([email protected], anonymous2, etc). Thinking about it, the former has the advantage of being easy to block by instances or comms that don’t like it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -67 months ago

      I imagine it wouldn’t be hard to add that functionality to an instance, but given the pearl clutching Lemmy instance admins are prone to it would be defed pretty quickly.

      • @KISSmyOSFeddit
        link
        217 months ago

        It would be defed pretty quickly because all bots, alt right trolls, pedophiles and anyone looking to share illegal content would instantly flock to it.

        • QuentinCallaghan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Amen, Sopuli wouldn’t federate with such instance either. It would introduce too much problems. Bad idea.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          From what I’ve seen 4chan seems to be able to keep at least two of those out with captcha and jannnies.

          You’d probably need to limit anonymous posting to local communities to prevent issues though.

      • 🏴 hamid abbasi [he/him] 🏴
        link
        fedilink
        117 months ago

        Sorry you being able to store child porn on my instance is considered pearl clutching. No fucking way I want that responsibility because I like to read memes.

      • @voracitude
        link
        47 months ago

        Tell you what: you go host that instance, with no pearl-clutching. Don’t worry about any knocks at the door, or federal agents abseiling through your windows. You don’t clutch no pearls, right?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          My point was more that instance admins defed for things that are comparatively minor, relative to allowing anonymous posting, not that allowing anonymous posting is a good idea (even if it’s technically possible).

  • @ricdeh
    link
    English
    -57 months ago

    Isn’t Lemmy pretty much that?

    • slazer2au
      link
      English
      97 months ago

      Almost, I would guess OP is talking about places to post that doesn’t require accounts.

    • whoareuOP
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      actually it depends on which instance you have chosen and the privacy policy of chosen instance. my instance doesn’t require an email so it’s pretty much anonymous like 4chan. but I want to find out some different forum or board that isn’t Lemmy.

      Edit: plus you can’t post without an account on Lemmy.

      • 2xsaiko
        link
        fedilink
        67 months ago

        It would be interesting to make a Lemmy fork that doesn’t require login and registers all posts as anonymous@(instance). Would probably get insta defederated by every other instance though lol