• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      Ranked choice. You basically get 6 votes. Your #1 pick gets 3 votes, your #2 gets 2, your #3 gets 1.

      Just call them points instead of votes. Voting is the action of making your three picks and you’re only allowed to do that once.

    • @Korne127
      link
      91 year ago

      Or just do a normal proportional parliament in which each party gets as many seats relative to how many votes it gets.

      I mean that doesn’t work for Presidential elections, you need Ranked Choice voting for that, but still, having a real democracy for the parliaments instead of FPTP would be much better.

      • Ophy
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Yep, Mixed Member Proportional system means that you get to elect someone to represent your area, and know that the overall makeup of the parliament will be proportional to the overall party votes received.

        And as you mention, a form of ranked choice voting is still needed for any “finite seat” vote, such as local representatives, where you’re electing individuals rather than groups.

        FPTP is a horrendous system and all it does is incentivise strategic voting, which is problematic because ideally we should all vote for whatever suits our interests and beliefs, without worrying about whether our votes are being wasted.

  • @DannyMac
    link
    181 year ago

    To combat this, we need more conservative parties.

    • SadCackOP
      link
      21 year ago

      Finally! Someone gets it!

  • @Korne127
    link
    101 year ago

    It’s true, first past the post is absolute shit and voting third party on it is just useless. But rather blame the dumb guys who vote Republican than those who at least try to stop them.