Translation:

You will come to London. Behold, I warn you, whatever of evil or of perversity (behavior or beliefs that are considered immoral or unnatural) there is in any, whatever in all parts of the world, you will find in that city alone. Do not go to the dances of panders (people who arrange sexual relationships for others), nor mix yourself up with the herds of the stews (brothels or houses of prostitution); avoid the talus (dice games) and the dice, the theatre and the tavern. You will find more braggadocios (boastful, arrogant people) there than in all France, while the number of flatterers (people who praise excessively to gain advantage) is infinite. Stage players (actors), buffoons (clowns or jesters), those that have no hair on their bodies (eunuchs, men who have been castrated, typically to serve in positions of trust around women or in royal households), Garamantes (a North African tribe), pickthanks (flatterers or sycophants), catamites (young boys used for homosexual purposes), effeminate sodomites (men who engage in anal sex), lewd musical girls, druggists (people who manufacture or dispense drugs), lustful persons, fortunetellers, extortioners (people who obtain money through force or threats), nightly strollers (people who wander the streets at night, possibly for criminal purposes), magicians, mimics (people who imitate the speech and mannerisms of others), common beggars, tatterdemalions (raggedly dressed people)—this whole crew has filled every house. So if you do not wish to live with the shameful, you will not dwell in London.

Source at The Internet Archive

  • @Flummoxed
    link
    574 months ago

    What a crazy context for this excerpt. Clear example of the depth of anti-semitism during this time period.

    It is “A Jew” telling a Christian boy where to go in England once he gets there. While the boy thinks the Jew is looking out for him, he is actually sending him to be butchered by the Jews in Winchester, which he characterizes as the most moral place in England after he goes on and on about the wretchedness of all the other places in England the boy might come upon. He gives the boy a note to show to the Jews in Winchester, “written in Hebrew” so the boy doesn’t actually know what it says. Boy gets to Winchester and does as told, then soon disappears. Clearly he’s been killed by the Jews, but why they had to go to so much trouble to get him to Winchester is unclear.

    Oh… Right… That’s because this is all made up by Christians desperate for reasons to get rid of Jews.

    • @Stovetop
      link
      444 months ago

      Holy crap, I took a look at the following passages in the source linked by OP and you weren’t kidding.

      “That Jew is a devil; he has stolen away my heart from my breast—he has butchered my only companion, and I presume, too, that he has eaten him. A certain son of the devil, a Jew of French birth, I neither know nor am acquainted with; that Jew gave my comrade letters of his death-warrant to that man. To this city he came, induced, or rather seduced. He often gave attendance upon this Jew, and in his house he was last seen.”

      The text accuses the Jewish community of cannibalism during Passover, with the note apparently being a message to kill and eat the bearer. Gotta keep drumming up that religious hysteria or else people might start seeing Jews as humans.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        224 months ago

        If there’s one time you know you’re definitely not going to be cannibalized by observant Jews, it’s Passover.

      • @Flummoxed
        link
        13
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes!

        Honestly, left out the cannibalism so I didn’t sound too crazy.

    • @Etterra
      link
      14 months ago

      I though it was a little early for the Puritans to be opening their nose holes. Good to know.

    • nifty
      link
      244 months ago

      Show off

        • nifty
          link
          14 months ago

          I’ll go if you go

  • @krashmo
    link
    184 months ago

    Nightly strollers is an interesting one. The rest have mostly survived as things a certain subset of people look down on but I don’t think there’s many modern complaints about people walking at night. Unless maybe that specific wording implies some sort of unsavory behavior I’m not aware of.

    • @Flummoxed
      link
      224 months ago

      There were curfews in walled towns like London: all citizens were expected to be home with their fires out once the church bells tolled nine. Or maybe it was eight. Anyway, to walk at night then was nefarious in itself, as there was absolutely nothing worth doing that wasn’t nefarious after curfew.

    • @ummthatguy
      link
      English
      114 months ago

      Presumably “neerdowells” (noun. an idle, worthless person; a person who is ineffectual, unsuccessful, or completely lacking in merit; good-for-nothing) or other scoundrels I would think.

  • @HappycamperNZ
    link
    104 months ago

    You had me at Lewd musical girls and lustful persons.

    No translation needed

    • @Uncle_Sheo217
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      I read lewd musical girls as “lewd muscle girls” and was profoundly disappointed when I realized my mistake

    • @Valmond
      link
      24 months ago

      And night strollers!