• themeatbridge
    link
    435 months ago

    This is Chewbacca Defense-level nonsense. I don’t even know where to begin.

  • stinerman [Ohio]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    345 months ago

    “Science cannot be used to prove evolution is true, but it can be used to prove it’s false.”

    • manucode
      link
      fedilink
      285 months ago

      That’s technically true. The beauty of science is that nothing is assumed to be the absolute truth. Even the most rock solid theory could be proven wrong one day.
      Science deniers though will obviously only require proof for those scientific theories they dislike without applying the same standard to their own ideas.

  • kbin_space_program
    link
    fedilink
    275 months ago

    Its amusing how the creationists have mostly stopped trying to attack “deep time” and instead really misuse science.

    Like that “finger”. Do they think early hominids didnt have fucking hands and fingers or something? That we were all snakes or clawed devils?

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      175 months ago

      If you really want to be stupidly speculative and assume that’s an actual piece of an animal, you could just as easily speculate that it’s, say, a condor talon.

      • kbin_space_program
        link
        fedilink
        95 months ago

        Yeah, but my point is, even if it is a finger, and thats a pretty massive if. And if its a soft tissue fossil from 3MYA.

        So what?

        It fits the overall shape of the end of a finger of any great ape. Sure, it would be a stupendous scientific find, but it couldn’t disprove evolution.

        • @Shou
          link
          55 months ago

          How dope wpuld it be if it was a thumb of gigantalopithicus?

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            35 months ago

            I would not put any stock in this except that Milo Rossi (Miniminuteman) is an archaeologist who specializes in debunking bad archaeology made a video saying it wasn’t complete nonsense, but apparently there is a site which, if proven to show what it seems to show, would indicate that some sort of pre-homo sapiens hominid was in North America 130,000 years ago.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5z3DbmOuaFI

            This is extremely preliminary, so it’s one of those “stay tuned” sort of things, but wouldn’t that be incredible? We know that Homo Erectus spread all the way to the Eastern end of China and north into Siberia, so it’s not absolutely impossible that it happened.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    245 months ago

    “Look at this thumb!”

    Okay, let’s pretend it’s a thumb and not some kind of concretion. Why does it have more nails at the base of the thumb?? What fuckin anatomy is going on there? This relies entirely on you glancing at it for half a second on Facebook and seeing the right trigger words to not look at it any harder.

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      125 months ago

      Also, I’m willing to buy that skin might be preserved somehow, but not the soft tissues underneath it. Not s perfectly preserved whole thing including the fucking cuticles.

      • Drusas
        link
        fedilink
        85 months ago

        Everyone knows adipose tissue is the first to fossilize.

  • @Raiderkev
    link
    175 months ago

    How is that fossil 3 million years old when the earth is only 6000 years old?

    • @EvolvedTurtle
      link
      85 months ago

      My dumb ass was about to correct you before realizing it’s a Christian reference

      • @Raiderkev
        link
        15 months ago

        Ha, I was waiting to be downvoted to oblivion by people who didn’t get the joke.

    • @Agent641
      link
      25 months ago

      The ideal argument against this is that photo of a smorgasbord of food where all the food is actually a rock.