• @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
    link
    English
    335 months ago

    Hurricane Betsy — the second storm of the year — hit New Orleans on September 9, 1965. Katrina — the 11th storm — hit New Orleans August 29th, 2005. And now we apparently have Category 5 storms forming in late June/early July.

    Every hurricane season (and hurricane) is different, obviously, and that’s one city’s experience but it makes me wonder if there will even be a distinct “hurricane season” in a few decades.

    • kbin_space_program
      link
      fedilink
      155 months ago

      Not just early July. A full 16 days earlier than the previous record from 2005. The record before that was Allen(so the first hurricane of the season) all the way back in August 5 of 1980.

      They also used to be rare, and are getting less so. Since 1924, only 39 are known. Since 1960, there have been 30. 8 of those(so ~20%) are since 2016.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        Iirc they’re talking about adding more category levels too because 5 just doesn’t cut it anymore.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      145 months ago

      Hey, I like your optimism, assuming we’ll still be here in a few decades.

      • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
        link
        English
        95 months ago

        Ironically, New Orleans might be OK because we have elaborate flood control systems and have always dealt with flooding. Vulnerable places like the Netherlands and New Orleans are what we all assume will end up flooded. (And we will.)

        But we’re built for it. A river delta floods sometimes anyway. I’m honestly more worried about places where snowmelt creates small streams now but in the future, will just create terrible floods every Spring and then draught immediately after.

        To me, the scary part isn’t having water in the streets. It’s climate change. We had an issue recently where there wasn’t enough fresh water draining into the Mississippi to push the salt water back. It ultimately never reached NOLA but it reached plenty of people downriver. And because of a drought in the Midwest.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    225 months ago

    Wait, isn’t this what everyone wanted?? Why the fuck have we been poisoning the atmosphere for the last century if not to enjoy more category 5 hurricanes? I’m so confused.

  • slazer2au
    link
    English
    65 months ago

    Should I? I am in Europe.

      • NaibofTabr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        155 months ago

        It’s related. Warming ocean temperatures are amplifying the hurricanes and destabilizing currents like the Gulf Stream - both symptoms of the same problem.

    • @NJSpradlin
      link
      14
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      What does it mean about the broader* global warming issue?

    • @grue
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Good luck with your impending ice age.

    • Chainweasel
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Considering that it’s the fact that it even exists right now is the concerning part, yes.
      The earth is a closed system, just because there’s a very early hurricane half a world away doesn’t mean the climate isn’t being effected everywhere.
      For you this could mean an increased amount of warm water moving in through the Gulf stream to the North Atlantic. This will bring warmer waters to the coastal regions of Europe increasing the severity of storms there, until that warmer water causes the Gulf stream to completely collapse plunging Europe into an early ice age.
      The weather where this hurricane is does directly affect you where you live.

    • @Marthirial
      link
      15 months ago

      Nope. Don’t need to worry about copious amounts of water raining down, just the water wars.

  • @Allonzee
    link
    3
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Agreed, kind of a bold assertion to throw out without proof against a highly rated international charity

        Charity Navigator 4-star 99%

        Guidestar Platinum

        Charity Watch A-

        Looks like there were some issues with transparency 5-10 years ago (Google “Pro Publica Red Cross”), but I’m not finding any recent follow-ups and they’re scoring high marks for transparency now. They pretty consistently spend ~90% of every dollar donated on programs and are generally well-respected.

        Are they a perfect charity? Probably not. But are they doing good? Absolutely.

        If you want to donate money elsewhere, by all means go for it. Doctors Without Borders, and World Central Kitchen are great international charities, and local food banks in impacted communities can make your dollar go further than just about anyone else.

        But also remember money isn’t the only donation the Red Cross accepts - as with any major disaster, blood will be in short supply, and there is unequivocally no better network for blood donations than the Red Cross.