• @breadsmasher
    link
    English
    361 month ago

    Why would the NATO chief comment on the president’s health at all?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 month ago

      But he said any further comments could be damaging for NATO.

      “One of the reasons why NATO is successful is that we have always stayed out of domestic political issues,” he said.

      “If I start to say anything that makes it possible to connect me to ongoing political debates in any allied country, I will actually weaken the alliance.”

      He wouldn’t, and he knows it. He was asked about Biden’s health and did his job by not really answering.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They together planned the biggest act of sabotage in history, so maybe journos thought he’s so close confidante in other issues too.

      Also, Biden is commander of the biggest military in NATO, so it’s natural to assume this question is of the interest to the chief of NATO.

  • @mkwt
    link
    21 month ago

    I can’t immediately find a reference for this, but I would assume that all US forces deployed to support NATO in Europe can be commanded by the Supreme Allied Commander (SACEUR) who is always an American general. If the Russkies decide to invade, I’m sure that SACEUR has the authority to dictate response if he can’t immediately reach the President.

    The only reason that NATO would need to urgently and immediately speak to POTUS is for nuclear weapons release, and fortunately that scenario has been wargamed to hell and back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Even more. That is why the vice president and a whole protocol of succession exists.

      An old president is hardly like a feudal nation where a king dies without children.