• raef
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    They look like historical reenactors

      • Diplomjodler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        If they’re not, they were in for a nasty surprise the first time they charged into a position with machine guns.

        • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is a year before the start of WW1, so that’s likely precisely what happened. The start of the great war completely changed tactics and overall military doctrine. At the beginning, officers would often command cavalry charges against machine gun fire, with expected results

  • luciddaemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    Its odd to think this is how it was prior to machine guns and tanks. Color really does make it feel like a reenactment.

    • grue
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      this is how it was prior to machine guns and tanks

      Unless OP typo’d the year in the title and this wasn’t actually from 1913, Gatling guns had existed for almost half a century and the British Mark I tank was only 3 years away.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s really high quality for literal potato photography.

    (Context: The autochrome used starch particles from potatoes - some dyed red, others green, others blue - over the photosensitive layer on a glass photography plate as a color mask that was used both for filtering incoming light as the photo was taken, and for producing appropriate colors when viewing. The images needed to be shown backlit at high intensity, and neither color reproduction nor sharpness was very good. Starch was cheaper than three times as much photosensitive material, though.)