Most medical students at Johns Hopkins University will no longer pay tuition thanks to a $1 billion gift from Bloomberg Philanthropies announced Monday.

Starting in the fall, the donation will cover full tuition for medical students from families earning less than $300,000. Living expenses and fees will be covered for students from families who earn up to $175,000.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2692 months ago

    Uplifting: this is objectively a ton of good done for these students

    Dystopian: this money was earned by the theft of value produced by working class labor and throwing a few breadcrumbs of it back into the system and acting like it’s some great pure good is pure evil and people will lap it up like dogs

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1262 months ago

      Yeah. Bloomberg and the other billionaires should be taxed enough so that we can fund this and other social programs for everyone.

      • @doingthestuff
        link
        102 months ago

        Yes I hate it when the ultra rich decide to create a handful of “winners” leaving 99.9% of us still fucked. Will this make my future healthcare more affordable? Nope it just makes a small number of doctors wealthier.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          Nope it just makes a small number of doctors wealthier.

          No, it will the lives better for 2/3 of students. I can’t see how this is bad in anyway. Why would it be bad to make education free for some of the best future medical professionals.

      • LustyArgonianMana
        link
        English
        22 months ago

        Right? It’s almost like free education is good for society

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      70
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Medical education could have been free this whole time through taxes but instead public funding of secondary education was gutted instead of expanded so rich fucks like Bloomburg could keep more money for themselves.

      So even worse!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        My state essentially made nursing school free along with some other high demand positions in high demand fields but it’s just for community colleges so you’d still have to pay for medical school.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      212 months ago

      Even more negative outlook:

      The world is dying and fascism is rising and you spend a billion dollars on doctors not graduating with debt? They’re guaranteed quality employment! It’s the goddamn Dark Ages residency workload that depresses them!

    • NutWrench
      link
      132 months ago

      Yup. Every time there’s a feel-good story like, “a corporate donor spent $20,000 so a dozen orphans didn’t have to be fed into the Orphan Crushing Machine” the media never questions why the Orphan Crushing Machine needs to exist in the first place.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Rich people like to talk about philanthropy and charity being very good, and sometimes they speak as though the act of giving is virtuous and transformative for the person doing the giving. I agree with that, at least, but I think it’s pretty fucked up that they perpetuate systems that both enable and require acts of charity. Kindness and charity would still necessary and good in a more equal world, but more people would have access to it if there were less wealth hoarding.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -11
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I knew Lemmy could spin this into a negative. I was counting on it actually. The most cynical message board hands down.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
        link
        12
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        True, we should instead just celebrate this small one-off victory and forget the systemic issues that plague us. As long as the billionaires throw us a rare bone, we can leave the guillotines at home ig.

        • aname
          link
          fedilink
          -32 months ago

          You mean we cannot selebrate the small victories and continue working for more.

          Don’t be such a sith.

          • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
            link
            62 months ago

            …so exactly like the top comment Thorny_Insight was responding to?

          • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
            link
            3
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Not a strawman. The comment you responded to originally acknowledged both the positive and negative sides of this. Meanwhile, you commented only on the negative side as if we aren’t allowed to acknowledge it. I called you out based entirely on the words you chose to use.

            If this isn’t wasn’t what you intended to communicate, then I recommend you revise your former comment.

    • @Carvex
      link
      622 months ago

      Must be nice to have your taxes pay for something useful instead of guns and war like us.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It used to be free in Australia but then after the politicians all got their free education they decided the country couldn’t afford it anymore.

      To be fair the new system is still pretty reasonable but it used to be totally free.

      • @TastyWheat
        link
        52 months ago

        Ahhh, boomers. They got their uni education for the price of a McChicken and still ended up as some of the dumbest and most selfish motherfuckers on the planet.

  • @HogsTooth
    link
    512 months ago

    The original Hippocratic Oath made you swear not to charge to teach people about medicine.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    262 months ago

    With a billion dollars, I’d just buy enough congressman to make university free for everyone. They’re not even that expensive

    • @FireTower
      link
      82 months ago

      He did try to buy an election already.

        • @ours
          link
          12 months ago

          It makes sense. They don’t want to share the pie. But will happily accept an extra slice.

  • @HeyJoe
    link
    172 months ago

    It says starting in the fall it will be free, but how long does 1 billion last? How many years will they be able to do this for now?

    • @gibmiser
      link
      462 months ago

      Endowments aim to achieve perpetual existence by only spending dividends from investments. Assume growth of 8% of a billion means they can spend 80 million dollars a year without shrinking the endowment.

      • @NotMyOldRedditName
        link
        4
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The 4% rule can fail during some cycles, an 8% withdrawal would have numerous failure rates.

        You’d have to be willing to adjust heavily during downturns, probably yearly. Adjusting like that could cause uncertainty and make it difficult to apply for all students.

        3.5% over an extended period had no failures on any cycle.

        The 3.5% was looking at very early retirement, such as 35/40yr old.

        Edit: just want to add, those failures on the 4% were small. It was like if you started the cycle on 1 of 2 months many years ago and made no changes when shit got very bad, it would fail. The majority of the time you end up with vastly more money. But also past performance doesn’t guarantee future performance so who knows, but there is some risk.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      The operating expenses will show a sudden and totally coincidental billion dollar increase in 2024, and tuition will be collected as usual in 2025.

      • @TexasDrunk
        link
        12 months ago

        That’s how getting the government into student loans worked out. It took longer than a semester, but it cost more money than free college and put so many people in so much crippling debt so that evens out.

        Based on that, I expect that the costs will go up $750M and stay there so there will be one semester of free tuition, one of severely reduced tuition, then it will be so expensive that no one can go.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      The Internet says that the total cost for a degree from Johns Hopkins medical student per year is $64,665. In addition, various indirect costs like books, housing, healthcare, various fees, living expenses, and so on, bring that same estimate up to around $105,000 annually.

      $1,000,000,000 invested in a stupid boring index fund at an estimated 4% return yields $40,000,000 in interest alone, or, using the above numbers, enough for 380(.95) students each year.

      Based on this quick page from their own website: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/som/education-programs/md-program/our-students/class-statistics

      Wherein they accept just 266 students, it could last for a very long time.

    • Pasta Dental
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      This is the fediverse, what do you expect? There will always be something to be complaining about here!

  • @VelvetStorm
    link
    62 months ago

    I am choosing to only see the uplifting stuff here and rejecting the bad.

  • sunzu
    link
    fedilink
    52 months ago

    Must be nice being elite and to get free education haha

  • nifty
    link
    -5
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s insane making tuition free for medical students, who have the best chances of stable employment and increasing wage growth over the years after graduation. Make tuition free for humanities students instead

    Edit: drs have lots of flexible income

    Here’s some data though: https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/maryland/johns-hopkins-university/salaries/

    Median US physician salary: https://physiciansthrive.com/physician-compensation/doctor-median-pay/

    So this $1B gift to make med school free for people who wouldn’t have had issues paying it off sounds like tax cuts for the rich…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      142 months ago

      I get the hate, but as someone with some experience here, the amount of debt from a normal BA/BSc is miniscule compared to med school…like doesn’t even come remotely close. The amount of time spent paying that back for someone that doesn’t come from wealth is sometimes longer than they live…

      • nifty
        link
        -12 months ago

        Okay I hear you. I guess I was thinking of drs who end up making quarter mill usd 5-7 years after school. That kind of income isn’t guaranteed in any other profession, not even software engineering or law

          • nifty
            link
            12 months ago

            I appreciate that, it’s always useful to know more

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -4
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If you’re not making 200k as a doctor in America and it’s not a deliberate choice you actually should kill yourself.

        /S

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          After all that school, I hear you 😅. But physicians in Canada, for instance, make substantially less than our friends to the south…for some specialties, even getting to $200,000 doesn’t mean much when you have so much debt, fees, and other business costs. It makes a difference given the huge need for physicians all around…such a sacrifice on so many levels with little payoff untill so much later. Couldn’t imagine the impact a donation like this would have anywhere, let alone Canada.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      So and so.

      This could be a vehicle for a lot of people who don’t come from a great financial background and don’t want to take loans without knowing if they’ll even be able to graduate because they’d likely need to work through school, to get an education that lifts themselves and their families to a higher socioeconomic class.