tup proxies services on the local network to a remote gateway, all traffic between the remote server and the service on the local network is sent through a wireguard tunnel
think of tup as an open source and self-hosted alternative to ngrok and cloudflare tunnel
tupd (the server) can be found at: https://drive.proton.me/urls/GEJM1HT0DW#aOop4p7zxaPA
the tup client can be found at: https://drive.proton.me/urls/63SE9PW020#GFzZrprg9wjZ
Any links to the actual sources and not just random proton links?
Github comes up with a file-based build system for tup.
Same thought here, why uploading it to proton drive? github isnt evil that they trying to snatch that code or whatever. If you are so cautious then ramp up a gitea or gitlab self hosted instance up.
You are welcome to upload it to any git instance you want, I’m not interested in leading an open-source project like this
It is not about leading anything but about having the code in a repository so that it is easy to read/consult/audit/etc.
You can upload the code to any service (it doesn’t have to be GitHub, it can be GitLab, sourcehut, etc…) and disable issues and comments.
You can upload the code to any service as well
You’re right, OP. Just dumping it somewhere is acceptable. It doesn’t make it very accessible for other people. But since you’re not planning to maintain it or make it easy to use for other people… It’s alright. Most important thing is to include a license file or it can’t be used. But that’s it.
Yes thanks, it has a UNLICENSE file included, for anyone interested you can read more at https://unlicense.org/
perfect
Well, whoever is developing it should publish the code somewhere…
I developed it and I’m sharing it through Proton Drive only
Then you don’t welcome contributions. So this is dead in the water for me.
Anyone is welcome to contribute and upload their contributions on any platform they want
What’s the license on it then? Can I just fork it?
Those random proton drive links are the sources, and only the sources
If you want people to take you seriously about being open source, you need to have a git repo, like github, gitlab, etc. you can even self host one. Heck, you can even use a different (non git) DVCS, but not just a link to a cloud drive…
No I don’t need to have a git repo, if someone can’t take something that’s not on a VCS serious it is there problem, not mine
I let the code speak for itself
Do you think no one took Linux serious because Linus uploaded it to a FTP? It is how a lot of code always have been released
yeah… no. red flags galore. Why should anyone trust you if you don’t trust version control.
Using Linus as an example is interesting… Who the fuck do you think created git?
If you don’t want to use github, that’s fine, you have sr.ht, and https://savannah.gnu.org/ as good (and libre free options)
Code smells and maturity are signals people use to determine if they want to use/fork/work on a project. Not having source control is a great way to give yourself a headache over time.
I never said anyone should trust anything, in fact I believe no one should trust me, that is why there are no binaries included, just raw sources to examine and compile yourself
I’m fully aware of that he also created git, over a decade after, and it has nothing to do with the trusting of Linux, in fact Linux huge size and interest was the reason he created git, it was well trusted long before git, so your point is garbage
Garbage in - Garbage Out
I look forward to the next version of your project called tup_new, tup_usethisone, tup_fixed_fixed_fixed
You obviously didn’t even look at the links this time so you won’t probably care for the next either
N O P E
I use rathole for this purpose. Works great, minimal, great performance.
Also an great option, I have tried many from https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling but I’ve never tried rathole
Providing links like this on a forum sounds like a trap, it’s sad that you got so many downvotes for the lack of explanation (as given in comments).
A few more questions remain… Why did you program this? As in, how is this different or better than the alternatives?
There are so many! IMHO that’s a problem, as a user I don’t know how to decide…!
Absolutely, I would also be skeptic, it’s why I made it fully inspectable before any download
It is hard to summarize that exactly, I think it’s a more dynamic and configurable and minimal way to manage tunnels and simple proxies for me, in the readmes and the examples it says and shows what it supports more in detail
Believe me I also had the same problem, and still has, but nothing is a one fits all for these things
Thanks for the comment and questions
deleted by creator
