• @RapidcreekOP
    link
    485 months ago

    I wonder if that would have been discovered had trump still been president.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      245 months ago

      Discovered? Maybe.

      Foiled? No.

      • @MegaUltraChicken
        link
        65 months ago

        Discovered? Maybe.

        He’d probably volunteer to have our people assist.

    • Billiam
      link
      95 months ago

      I mean, Trump’s misadministration couldn’t have helped Russia if they didn’t know about the plot, so…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Id argue he could only help by not knowing about it, at least until after it happend and then he’d be the cover up guy. If he knew about it before hand it would have probably gone as bad as the coup he tried in Bolivia in 2020. Even Putin know Dons mouth is too damn big.

    • @Boddhisatva
      link
      35 months ago

      They would have found his body and then Trump would have claimed that Ukraine had him killed. Sure, that doesn’t make sense but when does Trump ever make sense.

    • @aseriesoftubes
      link
      165 months ago

      Does Putin give half a shit about international law?

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      135 months ago

      I think probably not, they’re still a civilian.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          We had civilians driving supply trucks for the US military in Iraq. I’d consider them legitimate military targets. “Civilian” is a pretty nebulous concept when you’re performing integral work supplying an enemy in wartime. If it’s legit to target a weapons factory of an enemy nation, it seems just as legit to target the guy running it. You can’t hack the rules of war by privatizing your military.

            • Makhno
              link
              35 months ago

              Location, role in the company, I don’t know.

              CEO should be the first person you’re allowed to target. They’re paid the most, so they should take the risk

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              05 months ago

              Yeah, we’re all contributing to some extent so “civilian” is meaningless if you go too far. But whatever the cutoff is, it should start from the top down. The receptionist at the weapons plant is a lot less culpable for the war effort than the CEO. But I’d also say if the receptionist got offed in a missile strike it wouldn’t be a deplorable civilian casualty. They knew where they were working and that their business is death.

              • TWeaK
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                The difference is that the receptionist isn’t being targeted, the factory is. I think that holds true for the CEO also. If they’re collateral damage it isn’t a warcrime, if they’re specifically targeted it is.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  Fair enough, though there are some employees whose death would meaningfully impact arms production, like a star engineer or a tech with hard to replace skills. A CEO’s death would also likely meaningfully impact arms production.

                  And frankly, I think anyone directly involved in making weapons that are killing your people is fair game. The army also has receptionists who don’t participate in combat operations, but they know what they’re involved in.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    95 months ago

    Wow this was actually pretty brazen of Russia. Which is wild to say given they are invading a country.

    • @cabron_offsets
      link
      105 months ago

      Nah. They’re banking on their orange bitch’s rise to power.