• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9327 days ago

    Rode in a car with a full tinted glass roof once. Everybody’s brains were boiling.

    Looking at that picture, all I see is sunburn, heatstroke, and headache.

    • @Num10ck
      link
      English
      1026 days ago

      dont a bunch of teslas have full glass roofs? what do they do?

      • @AA5B
        link
        English
        18
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        It’s very tinted. No worries about the sun. I suppose there must still be at least some greenhouse effect but from living in the Northeast, I’ve never noticed any heat from the sun through the roof.

        Compared to my Subaru’s sun roof, which has dark tinting but lets in a lot of heat, the Tesla glass roof tinting is much darker and doesn’t

        It may also help the perception of heat that I usually have cabin overheat protection turned on. After my car has been parked out in the hot sun, even if I forget to turn on climate control ahead of time, the cabin is never over 100° when I get in, and cools quickly

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        526 days ago

        Not only Teslas, it’s an industry wide trend, specially for EVs, but combustion card also have it.

        Heavy tint, optionally a shade and A/C. It’s pretty comfortable even in full July sun.

      • @BallShapedMan
        link
        English
        026 days ago

        Get hot, enjoy extra cancer in the future maybe?

        My car has an acrylic roof and never had an issue other than it gets hot in there. I put ceramic tint on all the windows this year and a cover for the top, helps so much when it’s 100+ outside with no clouds anywhere!

      • @Delta_V
        link
        English
        2926 days ago

        Some, but not all glass has a coating that blocks ultraviolet and infrared wavelengths. The technology was introduced in the 1980’s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1526 days ago

        Your link disagrees with you. Hoping nobody pays attention? Hoping for up votes?

        False fact post, bad faith actor, or llm. All 3?

        From your link: “You can still get burned with long enough exposure.”

        • @BallShapedMan
          link
          English
          226 days ago

          Lazy me, best I can find is with typical automotive glass a sunburn starts in several hours versus about 15 minutes with no sunscreen.

          So for the most part no. But it’s possible.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            626 days ago

            The lazy part was your statement being at odds with your source, while discounting other folk’s experience or skin.

            I know of more than one person who has experienced sunburn from closed windowed (newer)vehicle rides in full sunlight.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1226 days ago

        Depends on the glass. Normal glass has zero UV protection. In cars the front window usually has it, while the side windows don’t. Although I read that years ago, no idea what the current status is.

      • @Duamerthrax
        link
        English
        626 days ago

        It depends on the type of glass. “Normal” glass blocks UVB, which is the major cause of cancer from sunlight. I don’t know what type of glass they were using in 40’s era cars though.

      • @radicalautonomy
        link
        English
        226 days ago

        Funny you should mention that. The dapper gentleman in the front passenger seat was my grandfather. Back in the 40s, buying a new car was a very big deal, so he brought his friend from work and each of their mistresses. My grandmother didn’t find out about her until about a year later after all four of them had developed melanoma and naw I’m just fuckin’ with ya I dunno who they are.

    • @cosmicrookie
      link
      English
      2127 days ago

      Not much worse than a cabriolet or convertible i guess

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart
        link
        English
        1127 days ago

        They typically have roll over protections in the seat and windshield to save the people inside.

        This doesn’t.

        • @cosmicrookie
          link
          English
          3127 days ago

          Yeah modern cars do. Back then though, they didn’t even have seat belts. The glass roof, was the least of their problems if they crashed

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            But the glass roof would pop the airbags, reducing their effectiveness.

            • IndiBrony
              link
              English
              2026 days ago

              Can’t tell if you think old cars had airbags or if I’m interpreting your comment incorrectly.

              From my own memory, air bags didn’t really become a common thing until the late 90s. A lot of my cars from the 90s didn’t have airbags at all.

              • @Duamerthrax
                link
                English
                526 days ago

                Airbags were first patented in 1952. They couldn’t even become common place until the patent expired.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  326 days ago

                  Airbags were introduced in the 60’s as an option, no one wanted the extra expense.

                  It took regulation to make airbags commonplace, not really much to do with patents, more to do with airbag manufacturers, auto manufacturers and insurance underwriters working together to lobby for the regulation…since it benefitted them.

                  Not that I’m against airbags in cars - this is just how it came about - vested interests.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          527 days ago

          Modern ones do. In this era they didn’t, the windshield just folded flat and there was usually nothing in the back as well.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            226 days ago

            Hell, even today manufacturers will have warnings that the rollover bars aren’t for passenger protection.

            Crazy stuff.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              226 days ago

              Interesting. I think maybe try aren’t sufficient for professional use as a race-car, but protect sufficiently according to crash standards.

    • @AA5B
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Current nRollover standards allow metal roofs to deform 6”. As a taller person, that is a nightmare, so I’ll take the roof that doesn’t deform and crush my skull

      For modern cars like Tesla All the strength is in the pillars. The glass roof is for stiffness and to keep the weather out.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1127 days ago

      Which is why these things never go into production. If you follow concept cars, you’ll see this sort of glass roof idea pop up all the time. Nobody will ever make one because it’s functionally a solar oven.

      One exception that did make it to production is the Peel Trident. It’s still an oven, though.

    • @cosmicrookie
      link
      English
      827 days ago

      Did cars even have air conditioning back then?

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart
        link
        English
        1927 days ago

        1930 – The “car cooler” uses the evaporation of water (rather than your own sweat) to cool air, which is then blown in through the open passenger-side window. Though it’s the first item to actually lower the air temperature, it only works in areas with very low humidity – and it looks like you have a vacuum cleaner strapped to the side of your car.

        • @cosmicrookie
          link
          English
          1027 days ago

          They were pretty innovative back then!

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart
            link
            English
            1327 days ago

            Nothing speeds innovation like having one’s balls stuck to one’s leg.

            • @cosmicrookie
              link
              English
              627 days ago

              ok guys… Option “A” is castration. I don’t care how elaborate option “B” is, but we’re going with that!

        • @cosmicrookie
          link
          English
          227 days ago

          I’d expect this can to be above upper class models though LOL

    • @PriorityMotif
      link
      English
      226 days ago

      It looks like everyone in that car is suffering already

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 days ago

      65° on a clear day would be bad enough.

      I’ve had cars with a sunroof, and on clear days it could be hot as hell even at lower temps.

  • @LordCrom
    link
    English
    1926 days ago

    Its like a covered cooking pot. Can’t imagine how hot it would be in there

  • @niktemadur
    link
    English
    1827 days ago

    Detroit car execs from the 1940s. Ribeye and six-martini lunches every day. Drunk and reckless driving galore, above-the-law behavior six days a week. Mindless corporate crony bores with no inner life. I have no reason to believe Mad Men was lying about any of that stuff.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 days ago

      Maybe a little exaggerated.

      I’m sure it happened, just probably not as constantly as portrayed.

      Perhaps only 4 days a week.

  • @Hikermick
    link
    English
    1026 days ago

    Reminds me of the AMC Pacer my family had. Everyone compared it to a fish bowl

  • @MrJameGumb
    link
    English
    1027 days ago

    Wow! I can’t see any way that that could possibly go wrong!

    • @jaybone
      link
      English
      326 days ago

      But when it does go wrong, you will see it.

  • @Leviathan
    link
    English
    926 days ago

    Anybody have any stats on how many people were decapitated by these before we stopped making them?

  • @jaybone
    link
    English
    726 days ago

    Did they have tempered glass back then?

  • @espentan
    link
    English
    627 days ago

    Was it really glass, or perspex or something?

    • @AA5B
      link
      English
      326 days ago

      Can you imagine how quickly acrylic or plexiglass Am would haze over from erosion as you drive, and how it’d yellow in the sun after a few years (did they have UV blocking additives back then?). You be replacing the clear parts every year or two

  • @PugJesusM
    link
    English
    527 days ago

    Way cool, daddio!

  • @Nobody
    link
    English
    427 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    127 days ago

    People would fly down the highway, kids in the car, nobody in seatbelts. That was normal until the 90s.

    • @AA5B
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Seatbelts at least existed, even if no one used them. I once rode I think it was a late 60’s car, maybe early 70s, with lap belts for front only. No shoulder belts. Nothing for back seat