A widespread Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) issue on Windows PCs disrupted operations across various sectors, notably impacting airlines, banks, and healthcare providers. The issue was caused by a problematic channel file delivered via an update from the popular cybersecurity service provider, CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike confirmed that this crash did not impact Mac or Linux PCs.

It turns out that similar problems have been occurring for months without much awareness, despite the fact that many may view this as an isolated incident. Users of Debian and Rocky Linux also experienced significant disruptions as a result of CrowdStrike updates, raising serious concerns about the company’s software update and testing procedures. These occurrences highlight potential risks for customers who rely on their products daily.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1924 months ago

    The analysis revealed that the Debian Linux configuration was not included in their test matrix.

    You might as well say you don’t support Linux.

    “Crowdstrike’s model seems to be ‘we push software to your machines any time we want, whether or not it’s urgent, without testing it’,” lamented the team member.

    I wonder how this shit works on NixOS.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      714 months ago

      If I’m remembering right, RHEL is Crowdstrike’s primary Linux target. And NixOS wouldn’t even be a factor since it’s basically just not enterprise grade.

      That said, they need a serious revision of their QA processes.

      • circuscritic
        link
        fedilink
        35
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        RHEL, Ubuntu, & Debian cover the vast majority of enterprise installs I imagine, and provide a solid testing base for developers in the Linux business software space.

        Maybe you add Gentoo, some post-CentOS clones/forks, or other more niche industry/workload specific distros, but how you do skip Debian?

        • lemmyreader
          link
          fedilink
          English
          104 months ago

          RHEL, Ubuntu, & Debian cover the vast majority of enterprise installs I imagine, and provide a solid testing base for developers in the Linux business software space.

          Enterprises I imagine are using RHEL, Ubuntu, SUSE’s SLES and Oracle Linux and probably not Debian. But that’s a guess. Where can statistics and numbers be found ?

          • Pup Biru
            link
            fedilink
            English
            94 months ago

            consultant for large enterprises in australia, and i literally can’t say i’ve ever seen anyone running anything other than RHEL and amazon linux (so… RHEL) in production… unless we’re talking not for profits, and then that’s been a bit of a mixed bag

        • themeatbridge
          link
          34 months ago

          I’m not an expert in any sense.

          But it was always my impression that Ubuntu and Debian were what you use on personal machines, while RHEL is the baseline standard for professional servers.

          Is that not accurate? CrowdStrike’s target customer seems to be the sort of company that would insist on using RHEL for the enterprise features.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            18
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            That is not accurate.

            • RedHat is the standard for high-budget American corps.
            • Rocky and similar for low-budget American orgs
            • Ubuntu Server has a large following with developers who think they don’t need sysadmins.
            • Debian Stable is more popular with European orgs that aren’t incentivized by US government contracts to go with Redhat. It is much more stable than Ubuntu, has been more reliable in its support promises than Redhat, and doesn’t suffer from the NIH syndrome that infects both.
            • Ubuntu is popular with home users
            • Debian Testing is good for workstations and personal machines that need to be a bit more current
            • Debian Unstable for people who like Debian but want to live on the bleeding edge
            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              34 months ago

              The enterprise systems I see are only certified on RHEL and SUSE, debian is not even a contender. Obviously Americans typically choose Rhel and europe goes for SUSE.

              Debian doesn sell enterprise support.

          • Martin
            link
            fedilink
            144 months ago

            I’ve been using Linux professionally for 15 years. It’s been Debian or Ubuntu almost everywhere I have been. Although that might be regional.

            • @irreticent
              link
              14 months ago

              Which region, if you don’t mind me asking?

                • @irreticent
                  link
                  24 months ago

                  What’s it like living there? I apologize for the off-topic question but I’m fascinated by the Nordic States in comparison to my experience growing up and adulting in the US. I’m envious of your higher quality of life index being so high in those countries.

                  I don’t know where I’m going with this… just wanted to start a drunken conversation.

                  After doing a quick search I found we’re not too far behind you (two rankings lower) but I still like to hear from actual people how they view their govt., and how they’re helping (if at all).

          • valaramech
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Canonical and Debian both target the professional server space. I’ve spent pretty much my entire career working on Debian-based distros.

            Hell, the one company I worked for that I expected to use RHEL used Ubuntu for everything, so 🤷‍♂️.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            This is accurate.

            There is another reply that says “this is not accurate” that includes true information to back you up.

            For infrastructure, RHEL is the gold standard for large companies with a budget. The RHEL customer-base probably overlaps almost completely with CrowdStrike.

            RHEL imitators are popular with people that value cost savings more than the corporate backing ( beyond individual cases, this DOES NOT describe the enterprise space ).

            Ubuntu is very popular with developers in companies of all sizes. Outside of maybe being the base for containers, this is not how “infrastructure” choices are made though.

            Debian is popular with Linux enthusiasts and, where they have influence, businesses may use that. In enterprise environments, it is less likely this group is the one making the decisions. Again though, individual cases exist.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    974 months ago

    Users of Debian and Rocky Linux also experienced significant disruptions as a result of CrowdStrike updates, raising serious concerns about the company’s software update and testing procedures. These occurrences highlight potential risks for customers who rely on their products daily.

    Hot take: maybe bossware is a fucking drain on society, and people should stop buying it.

    • zelifcam
      link
      English
      89
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, but our leadership had a really nice lunch with their sales rep! Licenses for everyone!

    • dactylotheca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      164 months ago

      Well, if the executive leech class wants workers to have bossware, there’s not all that much people can do about it. Can’t just decide to not use it if your employer demands it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        194 months ago

        Worse, my employer doesn’t care about this shit but our clients are demanding we have the bossware installed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I didn’t mean the average worker. I meant the “executive leech class,” because downtime of this scale means lost profits, which is something they care deeply about.

        • dactylotheca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          which is something they care deeply about.

          They care about quarterly profits. Preventing fuckups of this scale requires long-term effort which is not profitable by itself, it only prevents possible future fuckups, and this is why proper QC etc. aren’t done. Short term profits over everything else.

        • TechNom (nobody)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          74 months ago

          In that case, it’s time for the average workers to sabotage the bossware. Let the leech class solve the problem they create.

            • TechNom (nobody)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 months ago

              Why are sensitive or critical hospital systems loaded with bossware? That itself is a breach of medical safety regulations and medical privacy. If such bossware fails for whatever reason - even sabotage, it’s on the leach class. Prosecute them for murder.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    874 months ago

    The software is not the problem. Software breaks all the time. The problem is monocultures and centralization. Building entire industry ecosystems all around a single point of failure. This is the just-in-time manufacturing supply chain disruptions and fragility all over again.

    Who knew, a diverse ecosystem was a strength, not a weakness.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      444 months ago

      The software is the problem if it’s produced with a corporate mentality of “ship first, fix later”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        114 months ago

        Yep, at this point the “security” companies can do with imitating malware development practices.

    • @madcaesar
      link
      74 months ago

      Nature has been telling us all long, but we don’t listen!

    • @PriorityMotif
      link
      74 months ago

      Everyone got an MBA and failed to realize it was just corporate brainwashing.

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    744 months ago

    “I don’t test often but when I do I test on the entire planet”

  • Toes♀
    link
    fedilink
    364 months ago

    There’s a concept in this industry where you eat your own dog food.

    Deploying these updates to your own people could have avoided this mess.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      364 months ago

      Oh but they did. Turns out that this is specifically caused by one driver expecting another to be installed, the other one being for another of their products. If you have the other product installed, it doesn’t crash, so it didn’t crash on their machines because they have all their products installed and apparently not a single element of their test matrix has the single most common configuration they service

      • Fox
        link
        fedilink
        94 months ago

        Do you have a source for that? I’m intrigued. Their own blog post is only talking about a “logic error”.

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          I heard a different rumor, that the driver file they pushed was all zeros. I’m inclined to believe that one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          It’s a very educated guess based on the following:

          The crash is a null pointer dereference, which a linter ought to catch.

          The crash does not happen if you have crowdstrike sensor installed, which is weird because crowdstrike sensor’s job is not to prevent any crashes.

          Hence the guess: the update the pushed tries accessing memory in sensor, but if it’s not installed the pointer is null and that’s Bye-Bye.

          • Fox
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            I see, thanks for the clarification. Sounds plausible.

      • @Mango
        link
        54 months ago

        This is the best explanation of this I’ve heard and you’re just like… A dude on Lemmy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    84 months ago

    The article implies that CrowdStrike issue impacted only Debian and Rocky 9.4. Debian I can see. But how did something impact Rocky but not RHEL itself or Alma or Oracle?

    Is Rocky actually different from RHEL now? Their entire brand promise is that they are the same.

  • rsp
    link
    fedilink
    64 months ago

    @lemmee_in I can’t find any news about this. Just a statement in a forum and everyone basing subsequent articles on that. It appears to have been limited to a single company? Is there any support for this claim?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Based on the article, it seems like the issue only happens on a specific distro. Is it only Rocky or other Debians?

      I wonder if other distros experience similar issues. Maybe linux based users don’t even install CS at all and try to leave their OS as lean as possible.

  • @suction
    link
    4
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Nobody breaks Rocky ok (spoken in a gruff, low, mumbling voice)

  • @irish_link
    link
    -134 months ago

    It also broke windows the other day…

    😂