U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the United States has ‘serious concerns’ about the announced result of Venezuela’s hotly contested presidential election that authorities say was won by incumbent Nicolas Maduro.

Speaking in Tokyo on Monday shortly after the announcement was made, Blinken said the U.S. was concerned that the result reflected neither the will nor the votes of the Venezuelan people. He called for election officials to publish the full results transparently and immediately and said the U.S. and the international community would respond accordingly.

  • @NOT_RICK
    link
    English
    751 month ago

    ITT: people that think Maduro’s government isn’t a corrupt clown show.

    You guys do know the US state department isn’t always lying, right? If Maduro had such a strong mandate why would poll watchers get turned away?

    • @small44
      link
      English
      431 month ago

      Yes Maduro is a corrupt dictator but the only reason why the state department is saying that is because it goes against Us interest. He couldn’t give a damn about venezuelans people. If it was a pro west dictator he wouldn’t say that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -41 month ago

        I think it’s more like if the US wants people to believe they didn’t try to rig elections in South America they should stop rigging elections and launching coups when that doesn’t work in South America.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -70
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It actively effects us when they get together in a caravan and cross our border because their county is corrupt all the way at the highest level.

        • Cyborganism
          link
          fedilink
          English
          401 month ago

          Maybe if your country didn’t get involved into fucking up the democracy of that region for corporate interests, I would have some sympathy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -351 month ago

            Yes, because we printed all the Bolivar they printed causing hyperinflation. What in the fuck are you talking about?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              241 month ago

              I think they’re referring to the countless South American counties that America has meddled with in the past.

              Cuba, Venezuela, Argentina, etc.

              Basically, you reap what you sow.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -231 month ago

                We didn’t meddle in Venezuela. Like what are you talking about. The guy thought he had enough oil to not need the u.s as a ally anymore. He cut us off from his country and tried allying with Iraq and Cuba. He failed though.

                • archomrade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  61 month ago

                  He cut us off

                  Cut us off from their oil, then America cut trade ties, then they allied with our adversaries because America turned their back on them simply because they were mad they nationalized their oil.

                  The guy thought he had enough oil to not need the u.s as a ally

                  Yea, that’s the point: the US views oil access and strategic alliances as interrelated. If anything I think this is just an open admission that the US DGAF about ‘democracy’ but is really only interested in the willingness of oil states to deal in their oil supply.

                  Lol America is so fucking entitled

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -14
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Let’s just looks at Venezuela.

                If we’re using Wikipedia as a source you might be interested in these parts

                Madsen alleging U.S. Navy involvement.[21] U.S. Senator Christopher Dodd, D-CT, requested an investigation of concerns that Washington appeared to condone the removal of Chávez,[22][23] which found that “U.S. officials acted appropriately and did nothing to encourage an April coup against Venezuela’s president” nor did they provide any naval logistical support.[24][25] CIA documents indicate that the Bush administration knew about a plot weeks before the April 2002 military coup. They cite a document dated 6 April 2002, which says: "dissident military factions…are stepping up efforts to organize a coup against President Chávez, possibly as early as this month.

                According to Michal Hertik, there is no benevolent relationship between the Chávez government and United States as a great power. Chávez is not interested in US foreign policy (actually President Bush’s beliefs) including “creating a unipolar or bipolar world, effort to create a powerful empire”. So he tried to break US imperialism and its interference in the affairs of foreign nation-states. Although he never tried to make South American countries agree with him.[17]

                Chávez initially accepted assistance from anyone who offered, with the United States sending helicopters and dozens of soldiers that arrived two days after the disaster. When defense minister Raúl Salazar complied with the offer of the United States’ further aid that included 450 Marines and naval engineers aboard the USS Tortuga which was setting sail to Venezuela, Chávez told Salazar to decline the offer since “[i]t was a matter of sovereignty”. Salazar became angry and assumed that Chávez’s opinion was influenced by talks with Fidel Castro, though he complied with Chávez’s order. Though additional aid was necessary, Chávez thought a more revolutionary image was more important and the USS Tortuga returned to its port.[19]

                They always hated us for no reason of our own. And wanted to take our spot as a super power. They failed.

                • Cyborganism
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  111 month ago

                  No. Trying to get rid of American influence and being independent without any US involvement is not trying to take a spot at being a super power. Get real.

                • archomrade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  So he tried to break US imperialism and its interference in the affairs of foreign nation-states.

                  They always hated us for no reason of our own.

                  LMAO, yes, NO REASON AT ALL

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              A couple years ago the US Navy committed international piracy by stealing a Venezuelan oil tanker that was trying to sell Venezuelan oil. And that’s just one example of the years of economic interference we’ve been fucking them with.

              It’s true that Venezuela’s economic troubles didn’t start with our embargo, but it’s also true that our embargo makes things ten times worse.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      01 month ago

      You guys do know the US state department isn’t always lying, right?

      Only when their lips are moving.

      ITT: people that think Maduro’s government isn’t a corrupt clown show.

      It’s always funny to see folks in Western countries carefully triangulate between corrupt liberal parties, then express slack-jawed horror when foreign voters do the exact same math.

      • @NOT_RICK
        link
        English
        20
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m more than fine with Venezuelan voters choosing their own government. I just don’t trust that this election was anything other than performative considering Maduro agreed to election monitoring and then walked back on it

        Edit:

        The government has arrested collaborators and closed businesses associated with her [Machado], from a hotel where she stayed during a campaign stop to women that sold empanadas to her from their homes. Her campaign manager has sheltered at an embassy in the capital, Caracas, for months.

        This sure screams free and clear election. I was pissed off when the DNC put their thumb on the scale of the primaries against Bernie; it’s logically consistent for me to be annoyed by this bullshit as well.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -151 month ago

      Welcome to Lemmy, where Murica Bad, and the less Murica it is, the more unequivocally good it is.

      • @small44
        link
        English
        251 month ago

        We are not living in a fantasy world where bad always fight good. It’s possible for two bad people,organization or country to fight each other. A country like the us who helped many coups and are supporting genocides can’t be good

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -131 month ago

          You live in a world where good always fights bad. We always smoke the bad guys. Try us why don’t it.

        • @PiousAgnostic
          link
          English
          51 month ago

          Honestly, it’s an oversimplified view on reality. The US is incredibly good and incredibly bad. Just like most countries.

          The argument over which country is better is like arguing philosophy. The argument has merit in lifting up both sides. But to say America is bad is sophmoric at best. It comes across like a petulant child.

      • Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -71 month ago

        It actually is.

        I’m so sick of American imperialism and it’s unfettered capitalism.

  • @RyanLiu
    link
    English
    221 month ago

    So, a coup in a couple years then?

    • @NOT_RICK
      link
      English
      111 month ago

      Trump already tried, it was pretty harebrained even by CIA standards.

    • CALIGVLA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      Suddenly a far right military dictator that very much likes the US takes power in the near future. Wouldn’t be the first time, or second or third…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 month ago

        Congratulations on coming out of your coma! There’s a lot you need to get caught up on…

        • @apfelwoiSchoppen
          link
          English
          -11
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Cool.

          Edit: sorry to stoop to ad hominem to combat yours. Edited to remove.

          • @NOT_RICK
            link
            English
            101 month ago

            It’s not an ad hominem to make a joke pointing out that there was an attempted coup in the US three years ago

            • @apfelwoiSchoppen
              link
              English
              -71 month ago

              Its ad hominem to say I’m in a coma, ableist. Yes I fucking know a coup was attempted. The US has a long history to the present about backing coups across the world. JFC.

              • @NOT_RICK
                link
                English
                71 month ago

                Just to double down on my ableism, you may want a doctor to examine your paper thin skin

      • Optional
        link
        English
        31 month ago

        You must have missed the news. That was a few years ago.

        • @apfelwoiSchoppen
          link
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Nope, didn’t miss that. Those assholes aren’t getting enough jail time. But that wasn’t the point.

    • unalivejoy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Followed shortly by Russia invading to “cleanse the area of nazis”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      It’s on the docket after the one in January, though if another one in the middle east comes up that takes precedence.

  • @TankovayaDiviziya
    link
    English
    21
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    ITT: Tankies being apologists for an equally corrupt regime who obviously rigged an election.

    I also rolled my eyes when I saw the headline. US don’t really have much of credibility on this one. But tankie wankers think the election result is perfectly okay simply because “suck it 'Murica”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      the election result is perfectly okay simply because “suck it 'Murica”.

      America is ontologically evil, therefore anything America doesn’t like is good. QED.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s more that we’ve got a long history of Sec of States going on record saying things that are categorically untrue. Could ABC News find us a slightly more trustworthy source? Perhaps an unnamed Iraq informant code-named Curveball? Or an FBI informant with Neo-Nazi ties looking to rat on a civil rights icon? Bill Clinton talking about a blowjob? Literally anyone more trustworthy.

    • archomrade [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -41 month ago

      US don’t really have much of credibility on this one.

      fuckin’… Yea, that’s the point

      The US doesn’t dispute foreign election results unless it benefits them; their complaint is essentially unrelated to the actual legitimacy of the results.

      Venezuela has been a target of US diplomatic aggression since they nationalized their oil. Say whatever you want about their government but their history has been fucked beyond recognition by US diplomatic intervention. That Blinken is wasting air commenting on it is simply more evidence of the US weighing in on affairs they ought to have fuck-all to do with.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        Venezuela has been a target of US diplomatic aggression since they nationalized their oil.

        Since 1976? Venezuela’s oil was nationalized by Rafael Caldera in that year.

        And yes that Rafael Caldera, the guy Chavez tried to overthrow lmao.

        • archomrade [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Yes, it may be surprising that US relations with Venezuela began before Chavez, but it’s true

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If the American government wants me to doubt the integrity of their election they should have kept their mouths shut and let the evidence speak for itself.

        We know they were suppressing the opposition, and by definition that means the election wasn’t free and fair. You want to do anything else? Find some proof and publish that.

  • @Sgt_choke_n_stroke
    link
    English
    131 month ago

    O boy this is gonna be civil. Does the United States have an interest in Venezuelas election because they have the largest oil reserves in the world? Or do they really care about the people in a foreign nation?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Venezuelan oil is rich in sulphur, so it is less attractive. It requires special infrastructure and buyers who have the installed capacity to deal with heavy crudes, like China and India.

      PS: funnily enough, Guyana’s crude is from a different geological segment and of higher quality and highly valuable, no wonder Maduro wants to annex it.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Guyana’s crude is from a different geological segment and of higher quality and highly valuable

        The US couped Guyana back in the 60s and never let the country out from under its boot heel.

        • @NOT_RICK
          link
          English
          131 month ago

          That’s an extremely flimsy claim given the PPP, an explicitly Marxist party, has held power in Guyana multiple times including this exact moment. I guess socialist solidarity ends when there are resources to extract?

          And yes I am aware the party just removed ML and socialism from their constitution but that hardly makes them US stooges.

          • @UnderpantsWeevil
            link
            English
            31 month ago

            PPP, an explicitly Marxist party, has held power in Guyana multiple times

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irfaan_Ali#Candidacy

            Immediately following his selection, Ali was accused of academic fraud, with opponents claiming that when Ali was in his early 20s, he had misrepresented one of his qualifications. Ali was also indicted on 19 charges of other fraud for allegedly defrauding the state of over $174M between 2011 and 2015, allegedly conspiring with persons unknown to “greatly undersell” 19 plots of state lands at Plantation Sparendaam and Goedverwagting in Demerara-Mahaica to current or former government officials.

            The trial on the matters was postponed several times. He was granted self bail on the charges. The lands, which were sold for $39.8M, are valued at $212.4M, according to the Special Organized Crime Unit (SOCU). On 14 August, the charges were dismissed.

            Explicitly Marxist guy who privatizes state lands to his business buddies for a fifth their asking price. Sounds very Marxist.

            • @NOT_RICK
              link
              English
              91 month ago

              And yet he’s still a leader of the party that Kennedy tried to sideline in the coup you mentioned. He’s hardly the first person to sell out for personal gain.

              • @UnderpantsWeevil
                link
                English
                21 month ago

                A party that’s been hollowed out by corruption. It’s no more the Party of Marxism than the American Republican Party is the Party of Lincoln.

                • @NOT_RICK
                  link
                  English
                  41 month ago

                  I don’t disagree. It also fittingly applies to PSUV

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Great, even if true, let’s start an international war to fix it, right Sr. Maduro?

          • @UnderpantsWeevil
            link
            English
            -41 month ago

            One man’s illegal invasion is another man’s democratic liberation. But this whole thing reeks of the Iraq/Kuwait conflict of '91, complete with arguments over who owns which oil field and shady corporate executives leaning on domestic news media to get people’s hate up.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              No, no it isn’t, Saddam invaded Kuwait to annex it. Let’s hope Maduro does not try to invade Guyana to annex it.

              • @UnderpantsWeevil
                link
                English
                -51 month ago

                Saddam invaded Kuwait to annex it

                Saddam invaded Kuwait to halt their slant drilling project into the transboundary Rumaila oil field.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  And also because Kuwait was the only party involved that refused some debt forgiveness for Iraq’s losses in the Iran/Iraq war backed by the US and its allies.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  Even if that were the only reason, that has no relation to Guyana, because these are geologically independent reservoirs.

  • @p5yk0t1km1r4ge
    link
    English
    11 month ago

    We have our own corrupt dictator looming on the horizon. How about we redirect these concerns to our own country?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 month ago

      Being consistent about transparent elections no matter where they are is one way to assert how important that is, including in the US.

  • @RizzRustbolt
    link
    English
    -31 month ago

    “None of our the other candidates got any votes!”

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      51 month ago

      The opposition ran a bunch of far-right reactionary psychos and still crested 44% of the vote. That’s definitely indicative of how far Maduro has fallen in popularity, even after an economic rebound in the wake of COVID.

      But when you run stupid candidates, you win stupid prizes. They tried to get another Jeanine Áñez white nationalist style lunatic into the President’s mansion and they flopped.

    • @Etterra
      link
      English
      141 month ago

      “Democratic.” Right.

  • @wurzelgummidge
    link
    English
    -231 month ago

    the U.S. and the international community

    the U.S. and the 15% of the world’s population that comprise the West

    Fixed that

      • @bigFab
        link
        English
        -111 month ago

        That’s pretty much 75 % of America + ‘Europe’. Not even a third of the global population.

        • @NOT_RICK
          link
          English
          111 month ago

          Guess we’ll have to wait for China and India to weigh in before we’re allowed to have an opinion I guess…

          • @bigFab
            link
            English
            -91 month ago

            Apparently facts get dislikes around here