Yes, that’s the point, Bill!

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    492 months ago

    “If they win, that is exactly what will happen, and it only takes a majority vote and the signature of the President,” they wrote, pointing to a comment from Harris, who reportedly has said she is “open” to a conversation about increasing the number of justices on the Supreme Court.

    Oh god no, not a majority vote.

    • @Maggoty
      link
      192 months ago

      Wait a minute, Congress and the President exercising their constitutional authority!?!

      Oh my God sound the alarms!

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    372 months ago

    Yes, Barr. Having conservatives on our highest court, have undermined the meaning of American justice, and thus removing them and keeping them out is a good long term solution, intended by term limits and oversight.

    • Atelopus-zeteki
      link
      fedilink
      262 months ago

      Had they behaved and acted like the reasoned juris doctors that they are trained to be, then they wouldn’t have brought this on themselves.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    322 months ago

    I’m not sure if I’ve ever seen that much projection in a single article before.

    Essentially every single thing that he accuses the left of planning to do is actually something that the right has already done, and is in fact one of the reasons that reform is necessary.

    The most frustrating part of it is that it’s not simply that he self-evidently has no integrity and no principles, but that he’s a short-sighted moron. Like every useful idiot in every authoritarian coup ever, he’s defending the autocrats simply because their actions currently align with his shallow self-interest, and is completely oblivious to the fact that they could just as easily (and sooner or later will) oppose his interests, and by then, in part specifically because of his shallow stupidity, it’ll be too late to do anything about it.

    • davel [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Bill Barr is not the least bit stupid nor short-sighted. He is not a useful idiot. He knows exactly what he is: a member of and functionary for the capitalist class, and he knows exactly what he’s doing: fighting a class war against the working class. Autocrats’ interests always have and always will align with the interests of the capitalist class.

  • @Zombiepirate
    link
    English
    202 months ago

    I will be open to the considered views of my colleagues on the bench, and I will decide every case based on the record, according to the rule of law, without fear or favor, to the best of my ability, and I will remember that it’s my job to call balls and strikes, and not to pitch or bat.

    • “Chief” “Justice” John Roberts
    • Atelopus-zeteki
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      Roberts and the Roberts Court should be reminded of this daily. Especially after these proposed reforms which were made necessary by the actions of the Roberts Court.

    • @Volkditty
      link
      English
      52 months ago

      “to the best of my ability” is a very favorable loophole in that oath.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    192 months ago

    I would really like to see our supreme court filled with neutral people. Someone that will side with the law, not religion, not party lines. It’s really what we should have but clowns are going to clown.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      In theory that’s how it works already. In practice, there is currently no disadvantage to appointing partisan judges and no system in which to objectively measure partisanship of a candidate. What that means is that there will always be partisan parties appointing partisan judges and there will always be candidates who claimed to be neutral who will be either accused of or proven to be partisan anyway.

      In the current system true neutrality on the bench does not exist

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Pretty easy to find out if they’re religious though. Getting rid of that would help quite a bit. A system to hold them accountable for being asshats would be great too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 months ago

    It’s journalistic malpractice to write an entire piece on expanding the court quoting Bill Barr without even once mentioning the corruption that got us here.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    82 months ago

    These judges are supposed to be impartial, Bill. They shouldn’t ascribe to any party, and they definitely shouldn’t do it publicly. Now, what’s going on here in reality is way worse than what I just said.