• @leekleak
    link
    443 months ago

    At this rate in 2028 they’ll be at -11th

  • nifty
    link
    193 months ago

    I like how the position axis starts at 0, maybe that’s for a year they don’t qualify

  • @Ejh3k
    link
    English
    163 months ago

    If the article is about how just a few countries are dominating the podiums, I think this is an incredibly effective graph.

  • @the_toast_is_gone
    link
    113 months ago

    This reminds me of that chart showing gun deaths over a few years that showed the line going down the more deaths there were. That made sense graphically, they colored it in to look like blood dripping down, but this is just dumb.

  • @wolfpack86
    link
    113 months ago

    The values are even incorrect. 2008, they got 63rd. 2024 they got 19th.

      • @wolfpack86
        link
        13 months ago

        Yeah it does. I fucked up, they actually placed 64th and not 63rd. Importantly I’m not a reporter.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    The Y axis is the absolute number of medals and the labels for each data point are relative rankings. If one country got all the medals except one and Ireland got that one remaining medal, there would be a data point at Y=1 with the label “2nd”.

    • @Trex202
      link
      15
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That theory might work if the data point labels didn’t directly correspond with the Y axis labels.

    • @wolfpack86
      link
      13 months ago

      Yeah but it’s not. At all.

      They’ve beent taking single digit medals.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    23 months ago

    Tbh I don’t see where this is bad (except maybe the 0 label). Why should “up” always be “better”? There are countless other examples where this is not the case. Or am I missing something here?

    • @chuckleslord
      link
      83 months ago

      It measures place, rather than performance (like medals got). It’s a line graph, when there’s no events between the data points, so it should be a bar graph. And yeah, up is better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        A bar chart for this kind of data makes no sense to me as the bar doesn’t really represent anything. A scatter plot is a good choice and adding a connection line for readability is imo not so bad. It should however be inverted going up to 1 and not down to 0.

      • ddh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Line chart is fine here as it’s the same measure over time.