• billwashere
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      This is awesome and 🤯 at the same time.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    274 months ago

    Right because it goes round so fast. I feel like this is somehow misleading tho, to be real

    • @blackbelt352
      link
      English
      344 months ago

      Sort of, basically because mercury has the small orbit it spends the most time closer on average to any other planet. The CGP Grey video someone else posted is a really good explanation as to what’s going on.

    • @lunarul
      link
      English
      114 months ago

      I don’t think it’s misleading. I think a lot of people who think of Mars as the closest don’t realize that it’s only close once every 2 years or so and unimaginably far away on average (further than Mercury).

  • @expatriado
    link
    English
    164 months ago

    when it is the furthest from earth, it is the least further

    • @prime_number_314159
      link
      English
      324 months ago

      If you take the sun out of the equation, the planets fly apart in all directions. Hope that helps ;)

        • @Kethal
          link
          English
          13
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          By the reasoning given for why Mercury is the closest for each planet, the Sun is the closest object for each planet, on average, excluding satellites of the planets.

          • @mecfs
            link
            English
            14 months ago

            I would agree but unsure because there are the intricacies of orbit cycles and timings and the 3d plane of space

            • rockerface 🇺🇦
              link
              fedilink
              English
              44 months ago

              I mean, the Solar System isn’t all that 3D. Inside of the Oort Cloud, almost every notable object is on or close to the ecliptic

        • @NJSpradlin
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Thanks for the attempt but your calculation is wrong, as it considers distance only on a one axis and not a two axis plane. With your circle assumption, mercury would be further than the sun on average.

            I wonder if anyone has the data without the circle assumption, and also correcting for the various other complexities.

              • @mecfs
                link
                English
                84 months ago

                hope my shitty drawing helps

                (replying from my alt)

                • @NJSpradlin
                  link
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  deleted by creator

      • @eyeon
        link
        English
        24 months ago

        I don’t think that would help, I quite like our relative location.