• @BertramDitore
    link
    English
    28925 days ago

    Judge Simpson said that “there is no direct link between the warrantless entry and Taylor’s death.”

    What?! How does that make any sense? If the cops didn’t illegally enter her apartment without a warrant, Breonna would still be alive today. Cause meet effect. How is that not a direct link?

    • Optional
      link
      15125 days ago

      Exactly. The fuck.

      Judge was appointed by Reagan

    • @2pt_perversion
      link
      5725 days ago

      I think the opinion (as bad as it is) is that if the warrant was good the judge thinks the exact same thing would have happened. So the fact that these assholes knowingly lied to get the warrant isn’t a “direct link”.

      To me making that argument kind of signals that no-knock warrants shouldn’t be a thing at all if you accept that an innocent would die either way because it’s so fucked up…and on top of that the cops still clearly caused this by lying because this isn’t a case of good warrant vs bad warrant - this is a case of bad warrant vs no warrant and Breonna still being alive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I think the legal principle here is that of a superseding cause. The case law on this matter is really complex and I, as someone who is NOT a lawyer, cannot comment on the merit of the judge’s decision. However, the case described in that Wikipedia article is illustrative:

      if a defendant had carelessly spilled gasoline near a pile of cigarette butts in an alley behind a bar, the fact that a bar patron later carelessly threw a cigarette butt into the gasoline would be deemed a foreseeable intervening cause, and would not absolve the defendant of tort liability. However, if the bar patron intentionally threw the cigarette butt into the gasoline because he wanted to see it ignite, this intentional act would likely be deemed unforeseeable, and therefore superseding.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        2725 days ago

        The case law on this matter is really complex and I, as someone who is NOT a lawyer, cannot comment on the merit of the judge’s decision.

        What are you talking about? Of course you can! Any reasonable person can see that this decision is bullshit, nuances of superseding cause be damned.

      • @BertramDitore
        link
        English
        2325 days ago

        Wow that hurt my head. I read the rest of the Wikipedia page and I think I understand, but damn, I’ll need to read the judge’s full opinion to see just how creatively he applied that principle. Tort law is not for me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        Sounds like that only reduces it to wilful negligence, not malice. There’s still significant liability there.

        Also, I’m pretty sure we’re talking about the officers that wrote up the warrant request, not the ones actually on scene who did the shooting.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    14925 days ago

    In the ruling, Judge Simpson said that Taylor’s cause of death was due to a gunshot fired by her boyfriend at the police and not a bad warrant.

    Jesus Christ

  • @faltryka
    link
    10725 days ago

    That’s an awfully misleading situation. They state that her boyfriend’s gunshot caused her death, which I think most people would reasonably interpret to mean that her boyfriend shot her in the moment, but what they really mean is that if he hadn’t opened fire on police officers entering their home without prior warning, they wouldn’t have returned fire and killed her.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      70
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      It also sounds like precedent to excuse cops murdering children.

      “Their parents killed them by opening fire at the intruders they didn’t know were cops with the gun they legally have to protect their family.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Who is saying that and where?

      Edit: Never mind, I found it. Note that this is the newspaper’s phrasing. Apparently what the judge actually wrote is more technical and less misleading:

      In his ruling, Judge Simpson wrote that the gunshot fired by Walker “became the proximate, or legal, cause of Taylor’s death.”

      • @almar_quigley
        link
        2725 days ago

        It’s still the same concept. The exciting incident is breaking and entering by the cops. Judge is still stating them entering illegally is not the cause which it is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      They state that her boyfriend’s gunshot caused her death, which I think most people would reasonably interpret to mean that her boyfriend shot her in the moment, but what they really mean is that if he hadn’t opened fire on police officers entering their home without prior warning, they wouldn’t have returned fire and killed her.

      Holy shit that’s beyond fucked. How can a judge rule that?

      edit: Oh nvm, I just saw who appointed that judge, wow.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7925 days ago

    This commando raid bullshit has got to stop. How many have died since Breonna? How many more will die? Fucking pigs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2925 days ago

      Seriously. Dude was gonna leave the house at some point.

      They just feel like as alpha badasses when they kick in a door and scream orders of submission. Fucking cowards

  • @aloeTGL
    link
    7625 days ago

    Looks like corruption wins again …. I’m tired boss.

  • 2ugly2live
    link
    6725 days ago

    They waited nice and long to do this so people wouldn’t notice because her murder was discussed a lot.

    What fuckers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5625 days ago

    That’s amazing. The bullet that struck the victim was not the cause of death, but the bullet before?

    So if an LAPD officer goes to raid someone’s home, and a gangster kills a bystander, the officer is responsible? If he hadn’t gone out for the raid, the gangster would not have fired the weapon?

    Wait but if the officers in Taylor’ case didn’t show up to the door, her boyfriend wouldn’t have fired the bullet. So it’s the police fault

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3425 days ago

    This is one of those things that I would hope Harris could speak to right now.

    My expectations are unrealistic, though.

  • @Korne127
    link
    2425 days ago

    Is there any way this can get overturned?

    • themeatbridge
      link
      3225 days ago

      No. But they are still on trial for falsifying documentation and civil rights violations.

  • qevlarr
    link
    1024 days ago

    Charges dismissed does not mean he was found not guilty. They could charge him again. Given what we know, the cops fucked this up. No-knock raids are a death sentence.

  • @acosmichippo
    link
    English
    1025 days ago

    “She wasn’t clear enough on policies”

    “I still don’t feel like she’s ready”

    yeah yeah yeah bro whatever.

  • @Doorbook
    link
    725 days ago

    I read this and I was not surprise because since October they have been blaming Hamas for the genocide in Gaza, and it seems this form of gaslighting is engrave in USA politics.

    • @randon31415
      link
      325 days ago

      Hamas: “Israel didn’t announce who they were, so I assumed they were intruders and opened fire. Then they shot back and killed my civilians!”

      • @Doorbook
        link
        424 days ago

        “We didn’t do anything to you this is hamas fault” Blinken, USA

  • @jordanlund
    link
    524 days ago

    Hate to say it, but I called it back when this happened. Shooting at the cops NEVER gets you an expected outcome.

    That being said, the no-knock warrant was the reason the cops got shot at.

    The bad warrant was the reason for the no-knock raid.

    The judge only stopped looking for root cause at step 1.