• veroxii
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3025 days ago

      If I had 2 cobras watching my back I too would grow as big as I wanted without giving a shit.

  • @General_Shenanigans
    link
    English
    6925 days ago

    The crazy thing about this is not just how evolution reverse-engineered what a snake looks like to a bird (or whatever preys on this moth), but also that some birds are born with an image burned into their brains labeled “avoid.” Snakes are such a problem to animals that may also prey on this moth, that a moth was able, over millions of years of evolution, to mimic that image through selective pressure. We’re not seeing here a moth mimicking a snake, we are seeing a moth’s wings resembling the image its prey holds in its brain of what it should identify as its own predator. An image that, itself, is held genetically and passed down from animal to animal, built by its own selective pressure. It’s amazing that this could produce such a clear image that’s immediately recognizable to us.

    • @xenoclast
      link
      English
      22
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Or to boil it down:the ones who’s wings looked more like snakes had more babies cuz they’re weren’t dead.

      • Tlaloc_Temporal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2125 days ago

        The ones whos wings looked like what their predators think a snake looks like survived more often.

        • @angrystego
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          I’m not their predator and I think a snake looks like that too. I therefore think the image is pretty acurate.

          • Tlaloc_Temporal
            link
            fedilink
            English
            624 days ago

            That means we see snakes similarly to the way their predators do.

            From a different perspective, the bee mimic orchid only vaguely looks like a bee to us, but it still successfuly tricks bees, so image accuracy isn’t the only factor. Both mimics can give us interesting insughts into how other animals see the world.

            • @angrystego
              link
              English
              323 days ago

              Yeah, I’ll add another example where it doesn’t work on us people, just for the fun of it. Tigers are quite strikingly orange and one wonders how they can hide in the greenery without being immediatelly spotted by their prey. But their prey sees the orange colour differently, for them, tigers blend with their surroundings perfectly!

    • @reinei
      link
      English
      925 days ago

      I mean don’t we also sort of carry that same image (obviously not exactly, but sorta) in our genes?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      625 days ago

      My dog will jump when I accidentally step on stick so that it suddenly moves, he has never seen a real snake. Non moving sticks that look like a snake? Doesnt react at all, I guess that routine was causing too many false positives and has not been propagated

  • OfCourseNot
    link
    fedilink
    3225 days ago

    Evolution’s fucking badass!

    The process that made these images is very similar to the ones used by genAI in some ways.

  • @TriflingToad
    link
    English
    625 days ago

    ngl it got me. It’s confusing attack was highly effective.

    • @angrystego
      link
      English
      124 days ago

      The butterfly is called Attacus for a reason.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 days ago

        I know, my brain is just very unhappy when it registers one :') I am getting better at it tho, only cried a little bit the last time a moth made it into my apartment

  • acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    324 days ago

    First step: Google it to make sure it’s not generative AI.

    Second step: allow oneself to be amazed.

  • @iAvicenna
    link
    English
    224 days ago

    where is your god now?