• @Rapidcreek
    link
    923 months ago

    I wonder if she wasn’t female if they would use the word “Saucier”

    • @BertramDitore
      link
      English
      723 months ago

      First thing I thought as well. If she wasn’t a woman it would be something like “sharp, more direct.”

      But hey, at least we noticed the gendered language? That’s……something.

    • @rock_hand
      link
      183 months ago

      What’s the male gender equivalent? language to saucier? Spicier? Trollier? Combative?

        • Orbituary
          link
          English
          14
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          “Swing low, sweet chariots. I prefer mine au naturale.” -Creed Bratton maybe.

        • @Burninator05
          link
          33 months ago

          That is something a lot of people would pay to see.

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        213 months ago

        Probably “tough” or “passionate”, though you could just look at one of the “both sides” titles they use for Trump’s tirades.

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      23 months ago

      That really depends on if she had a husband or a wife. I can see them calling a queer man saucy, I can’t imagine a straight man running for president being called saucy

  • Adderbox76
    link
    fedilink
    English
    673 months ago

    …she’s totally going to make him drop the n-word.

    Ridiculing him until he ego makes him crack is not a terrible idea, and it’s pretty damn entertaining.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        103 months ago

        Would it be? I feel like his supporters would take it as a sign that they can also openly use it without consequences.

        • @MimicJar
          link
          103 months ago

          There are many Trump supporters who don’t think Trump is racist. In the same way many Trump supporters don’t think he is at fault for Jan 6th. He didn’t literally tell his followers exactly what to do. They just happened to do exactly what he wanted then to do (until they failed).

          The same is true for viewing Trump as racist. He can dog whistle all he wants. He can align himself with other racists, but he isn’t racist because he didn’t say the exact words.

          You are right that for some people, him saying something gives them the freedom to say it (in their view). However for a sizable portion it will be clear proof that yes, he is racist. Not 100% mind you, cults are hard to leave, but 5%? 10%? Elections are won/lost in the margins and those are sizable margins.

          If course I don’t actually want it to happen. There is enough hate in the world and we don’t need more.

  • @taiyang
    link
    423 months ago

    8 years ago Hillary got in trouble for calling them deplorable. Oh how the turn tables…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      223 months ago

      And the hit dogs hollered.

      Just like when Obama said they were clinging to their guns and bibles.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      173 months ago

      The difference is that a lot of people strongly hated the Clintons. So any slip from her was a reason for the opposition to pounce.

      Kamala has so much swagger that even Republicans are supporting her. It doesn’t help that so many people are disgusted with Trump. So If Kamala slips, she turns it into a backflip and the opposition are too busy infighting to mount a attack.

      • @DharkStare
        link
        English
        293 months ago

        Her quote never really felt that outrageous. She wasn’t even calling all Trump supporters “deplorable”. Here’s her quote

        “You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Clinton said. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.” She said the other half of Trump’s supporters “feel that the government has let them down” and are “desperate for change.” “Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well,” she said.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          213 months ago

          Yeah, as usual she was pretty astute. If she had her husbands charisma and wasent vilified unjustly for decades, the above would not have been turned against her.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Actually, she only used “the basket of deplorables” to reference the most extreme group, who could never be converted or made to listen to reason, and were therefore not worth wasting resources on or trying to appease. In contrast to generic Republicans who might not yet be part of the Trump Cult. It was her tiny push to the left against the “sell out everything you stand for in order to pick up votes” strategy, but it was seized upon, twisted into how you’re remembering it, and backfired against her.

      • TheHiddenCatboy
        link
        English
        63 months ago

        Two very good replies. I’ll add to them.

        No, she specifically called out the racist, sexist, anti-gay, anti-trans jerks that thought the only worthwhile people in this country were White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Males. The Media turned this truthful comment into a big hubbub and inflamed people against the comment, implanting the meme idea in your head that she was calling anyone who didn’t vote for her deplorable. Her mistake was running away from that comment when it became clear the ‘liberal’ (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahaha…) Press was going to hit her over it, rather than sticking up for herself and saying “I was clear that not every voter who votes against me is deplorable, but nevertheless, a large portion of Trump’s voter-base is the kind of person I’d call deplorable!”

      • @ripcord
        link
        4
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        iirc

        No, you do not recall correctly.

  • @bazus1
    link
    English
    263 months ago

    his new tactic was on display at last week’s Democratic National Convention, where Harris described Trump as “an unserious man” while also arguing that “the consequences of putting Donald Trump back in the White House are extremely serious.”

    Such ruthless. Very sauce. Wow.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    -173 months ago

    I just hope she doesn’t go too far. I’m all for calling Trump out, but I don’t want Harris to cross the line and look like a bully.

    • @GoofSchmoofer
      link
      143 months ago

      Serious question:

      What would it look like for Harris or the DNC to be a bully to trump?

      • magnetosphere
        link
        fedilink
        113 months ago

        A LOT, actually. The more I think about it, the less realistic this concern seems. I’m glad you asked. Thanks!

    • @Sweetpeaches69
      link
      14
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I don’t think she’s going to mock any disabled reporters, mock dead troops, or rape women and girls, so it should be fine.

      Plus, literally everyone loves seeing a bully get their comeuppance.

    • @Marthirial
      link
      123 months ago

      The Dems high road and the GOP bottom of the barrel distance is now staggering, there is plenty of space to ridicule those weird fuckers. Fighting the reprehensible is never bullying.