• Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Indeed that’s strange, and the flat slope in 2060 seems inconsistent with declared net-zero policies of China and even India. Russia has no such policy, but still strange to assume continuation of current government concepts there until 2060. (you can see the regional breakdown in supplem Fig 1. )

      • acosmichippo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m guessing it has more to do with underdeveloped countries still relying on the simplicity of coal power.

    • acosmichippo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Uncertainties arise, however, over grid stability in a renewables-dominated power system, the availability of sufficient finance in underdeveloped economies, the capacity of supply chains and political resistance from regions that lose employment.

  • ikidd
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I would have thought Iceland would be geothermal.

  • Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Regarding the map - an annual average cost is not so meaningful - in higher latitudes solar is not enough in winter - especially where it’s mostly cloudy during the first half of winter. Wind helps the balance but not everywhere, always. Of course, the sophisticated models behind the article know all that, the issue is simplistic presentation. I note “we assume hydrogen is used for seasonal storage” - this may be rather optimistic - how many dark months can that cover?

  • thefluffiest@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Given that energy usage also increases about quadratically, this means that net CO2 emissions will roughly remain equal till 2060.

    This is not a good graph.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    By levelized cost of just the energy. Taking into account energy storage at different renewable mixes makes it a little worse for intermittent source. All that to say, nuclear can still be useful and cheaper in some situations.