plenty of legal safeguards
Can’t wait for the SCOTUS case on this
This exactly. When the “legal safeguards” only exist as long as they’ll hold up to scrutiny from a corrupt supermajority on a single unelected, unremovable body of 9 people whose authority is absolute, final, and does not require proper justification in any form, then the actual “legal safeguards” are that five people won’t initiate a coup. Which we saw absolutely already happened in 2000.
“Legal safeguards”… has the author been in a coma for eight years?
Remember when everyone said that about trump destroying All The Things after 2016?
Yeah. That, uh, did not work out. Everything got destroyed - in the most idiotic, incompetent, crass way - and “legal safeguards” did absolutely NOTHING to prevent it and precious little to remediate it.
The Conversation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Conversation:
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - Australia
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
