I… does the UN think they’re handling climate change well and promptly?

So ignore it until it kills us?

confused. so nothing will happen, a lot of talk and EU makes a law thats only applied locally if memberstates agree?!?

Problem resolved itself… ChatGPT is down.

So… a convention every 4 years?

“AI” is a scam that’s contributing to planetary destruction. But it’s nowhere near a problem on the same scale. This kind of political theater only fuels the “AI” BS.

I’d like to ignore it until it goes away too, but I don’t think that’s an effective strategy for either issue.

So, do nothing for 40 years while it gets progressively worse and allow countries to sign useless feel good things like the Paris Agreement?

« creating an AI fund to back projects in these [poorer] nations, establishing AI standards and data-sharing systems, and creating resources such as training to help nations with AI governance. »

So basically burn money and energy on some hallucinating algorithm should be as important as investing in green energy and reducing CO2 levels. That makes sense. Like, yeah, totally onboard. What could go wrong?

AI: “Put glue in your pizza.” UN: “Ow no! It’s sentient.”

IE regulatory capture and soothing bullshit?

Ugh, my issue is AI is a pandas box, we already opened it. Now it’s an argument of regulate technology and banning people from doing certain things on their own devices like running foss LLMs, like if we do that we can also allow bans of end to end encryption