• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    86 hours ago

    I feel like the bigg trux klan will just roll extra coal if they see you wearing this honestly idiotic lookig accessory.

  • @Olhonestjim
    link
    English
    138 hours ago

    Nope, definitely not. That is wasted space. The back is for holding a backpack with a hydration reservoir. Anyway, I’m trying to gain strength and lose weight, not reduce my times by .02%.

    • @robolemmy
      link
      English
      57 hours ago

      Believe it or not, hydration packs have been shown to reduce aerodynamic drag for cyclists. There was a brief moment in pro cycling where riders wore them during time trials to shave a few tenths off their time. Strangely, the benefit of wearing one backward (on your chest) is a little bit better than wearing it on your back.

      Needless to say, the UCI quickly banned hydration packs altogether.

      • Seditious Delicious
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        'cause the UCI are dickheads and want to live in 19…f@#k!ng…10. Let fixate on sock height, frame weight, aero tuck and shifter angles, but ignore road furniture, dickhead crowds assaulting riders and fine riders when the organisers cant organise (looking at you Vuelta)

        • @robolemmy
          link
          English
          23 hours ago

          You’re preaching to the choir, my friend.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 hours ago

        Strangely, the benefit of wearing one backward (on your chest) is a little bit better than wearing it on your back.

        That’s fascinating and makes me wonder if wearing both at once was tested. I can’t imagine it’d be comfortable though.

        • @robolemmy
          link
          English
          25 hours ago

          They definitely did try both but I don’t know if anyone was ever cheeky enough to wear that setup in an actual race.

          Currently they’re putting race radios in the front, centered side to side, during TTs. Rumor has it that the UCI has already had to tell a couple of teams to stop using extra tape and stuff to embiggen the radio lump.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98 hours ago

    Anything that makes a cyclist look even more fucking ridiculous gets a green light for me. Grown men dressed in spandex with sperm shaped helmets is already hilarious. Add to that a fucking binbag…

    What’s nuts is they can spend thousands for the look.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      168 hours ago

      Out of curiosity what is in the approved list of attire that you think is okay for “grown men” and what is in the unapproved list?

      • @CrayonRosary
        link
        English
        34 hours ago

        Approved atire is a t-shirt and shorts. Or a coat and pants if it’s cold out. Or nude if you’re in one of those nude rides.

  • Canadian_Cabinet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    58 hours ago

    Reminds me of those Civic owners who add a bunch of mods to make it more aerodynamic

  • @sazey
    link
    English
    69 hours ago

    How would this reduce drag? Genuinely curious.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      My understanding is that it has to do with form drag – aka pressure drag – which results in vortices forming in the “separation region” directly behind an airfoil. Or in this case, a rider. Essentially, the swirling of air behind the rider is turbulent – which is why a hoodie might flop all over the place – and that causes energy to be lost.

      This video on Nebula (and YT as well) describes pressure drag at about the 02m30s mark for a sphere. But this graphic from Skybrary also shows the problem:

      form drag

      By providing a smooth surface for air to “cling” to, where it would otherwise form vortices in the separation region, should reduce form drag, although it will cause additional induced drag (aka friction with the new surface). But induced drag scales with speed and at cycling speeds, that’s less a problem than it would be at airplane speeds.

      A related drag-reducing device has been used for semi-truck trailers, and those have really been proven to reduce fuel consumption. Although the Wikipedia article does not describe in detail the aerodynamic principles at play.

      • @sazey
        link
        English
        68 hours ago

        My genuine thanks for taking the time to craft your lovely reply.

      • Rhaedas
        link
        fedilink
        89 hours ago

        Here’s one site that has info on skirts (under the trailer to reduce side flow) and tails at the back. There’s an image of a wind tunnel view that gives a good idea what it helps with. Those vortexes at the back of a flat trailer suck a lot of power.

        image

        • Miles O'Brien
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 hours ago

          I’d much rather have my shirt going all floppy flappy in between the vortices and keeping my back cool than shaving 2 seconds off my relaxation cruises.

          I know some people who would jump on this 100% and I should probably send them the article…

  • Blackout
    link
    fedilink
    38 hours ago

    No. I probably should wear those padded crotch pants and clip-in shoes when I do distance but I’m low tech with biking. It’s all about the journey.

    • @robolemmy
      link
      English
      1710 hours ago

      Any safety it adds would probably be immediately offset by the added dangers of drivers being unable to see or steer effectively due to uncontrollable laughter.