• @deathmetal27
    link
    English
    12 hours ago

    This is some “Terminal man” shit right here.

    • JohnEdwa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 hours ago

      So did I. But after the new Deus Ex games and looking at the real tech scene evolve recently, I’m feeling more and more that just maybe Togusa had the right idea staying natural.

  • @tabular
    link
    English
    85 hours ago

    Hearing colour might be cool but I’d really like to upgrade my memory storage, and rocket punch.

  • mechoman444
    link
    English
    35 hours ago

    Wait… They did a remake of cyborg? Is Van Damme in it?

    • @deathmetal27
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Reading the article, it looks a lot more like The Terminal Man.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46 hours ago

    Neil Harbisson is the world’s first officially recognised human cyborg

    fucking bullshit. stephen hawking couldn’t function or communicate without his chair & computer. you’re gonna say that doesn’t count? then i don’t trust your judgement

    • I think the term cyborg is reserved for actual replacement parts or implants. Because if you count Hawking using his chair, you’d have to conclude that whatever caveman that first used a tool is the real first cyborg.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 hours ago

          yep, same here except i think power-source makes a slight difference to the degree of cyborginess. maybe we need a scale. maybe something like:

          1. caveman with tools, self-powered
          2. ancient person using naturalistic propulsion methods (wind, animals) for vehicles (ships, chariots) etc
          3. engine (steam, electric, gas) powered entities (vehicles, factories, aircraft)
          4. direct nervous system integration for thought-based control
          5. shared consciousness
    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      45 hours ago

      I think generally, assistive devices like Hawking’s wheelchair/speech synth wouldn’t qualify one for the title of “cyborg”, since they’re replacing lost/damaged functionality, and didn’t grant him any abilities not already available to the average person. Whereas Harbisson’s modification is giving him additional abilities that he didn’t previously have and are outside of the typical human experience.

      • JohnEdwa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Replacing lost functionality is also acceptable for a cyborg, but Hawkings simply didn’t replace any organic part of himself, he used external devices. Someone with cochlear implants or a total artificial heart totally should count as a cyborg though - they have integrated mechanical body parts (well, both are partly external I guess…)
        But it doesn’t really make sense that just because this version of a hearing implant doesn’t give you better than normal hearing, having an identical device that did would be the difference between being a cyborg or not.

    • baduhai
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 hours ago

      I know somebody who has implated hearing aids. If they’re not a cyborg, I don’t know who is.

    • @tabular
      link
      English
      26 hours ago

      Those are a part of the image of Hawkings but not a part of his body.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    189 hours ago

    It’s just living up to their part of the deal: if I’m going to get the dystopia part, I damn well better also get the cyberpunk part.

  • @Eheran
    link
    English
    26 hours ago

    “upgraded”, sure sure.