• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    325 hours ago

    Execution shouldn’t be an option. At least with life in prison you can release a person if you fucked up, with significant financial compensation for their time in prison. You can’t un-execute a person. The state isn’t competent enough to be given such power. Nobody is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 hours ago

      The “nobody is” is the most important part to me.

      Like, society can argue all they want about choosing to execute convicted criminals of certain crimes. I’m not discussing that.

      It’s the “beyond all doubt” factor that matters most. I think we’d agree that for ~99.99999% of crimes it’s really impossible to be sure.

      If you can’t be sure, then there’s no reason to graduate to the next step of the decision “should we”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      But what is the cost of compensation for executing somebody that was likely innocent?

      —Think about this. Life in prison is cheaper than an execution If the convict serves their entire sentence. –Is it still cheaper if the inmate has their conviction overturned and subsequently sues for restitution?

      I genuinely don’t know the answer to the latter question but nothing about sanctioned executions sits right with me.

  • @Warl0k3
    link
    32
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    South Carolina executed a man on death row on Friday, days after the key witness for the prosecution came forward to say he lied at trial and the state was putting to death an innocent man.

    “New evidence” seems to be underselling the matter. How in the fuck could they justify not even granting a delay??

    • @kevindqc
      link
      205 hours ago

      Black man in South Carolina is enough apparently

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I don’t understand how you can convict someone based on the testimony of a person getting a plea deal for turning in another person.

    The last thing the person getting the plea deal would want to do is turn over someone loyal enough to them to rob a place and shoot another person with.

    Does anyone think this would have happened if the accused was the son of a wealthy white couple? How about if it was the police chief’s son? Any senator’s son?

    Just saying. Testimony without hard evidence shouldn’t be enough for criminal conviction, let alone a fucking execution.

  • @Yawweee877h444OP
    link
    44
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Despite new evidence of innocence.

    Conservatives/Republicans are psychopaths. Pure abject sadistic evil.

    • @halcyoncmdr
      link
      English
      144 hours ago

      Not just new evidence. There was never any physical evidence linking him to the crime at all, according to the articles I’ve seen so far looking into it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    246 hours ago

    Another potential innocent murdered by the state so they can claim they’re “tough on crime”

    • @Warl0k3
      link
      115 hours ago

      Black man named Allah in South Carolina? That’s two illegal things already! Clearly he deserved to die!

    • @kevindqc
      link
      75 hours ago

      What? Because he’s black? Wtf