Who can suggest an ethical SMTP provider for low volume transactional mail? I’m willing to pay up to 2€/month for a few hundred mails per month.

    • Mayor Poopington
      link
      English
      222 months ago

      I bet op is one of those hippies that doesn’t like their SMTP tested on animals

      • @callccOP
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        Yeah, sorry it’s not a precise term. I mean a non asshole company.

    • @callccOP
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Mostly that they respect the privacy of my users and that they don’t have shady business practices that want to push you towards an over-expensive paid tier.

      • umami_wasabi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        I’m using Postmark for my Vaultwarden. Nothing major I know of.

  • @FlightyPenguin
    link
    English
    82 months ago

    I don’t know what you mean by “ethical”, but I use Sendgrid. They have a free tier that can send up to 100 emails a day.

    • @callccOP
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      Pretty nice but way more expensive then simplymail

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        EU servers might be worth something to some people, depending on where they are in the world. And while 190% is indeed “way more expensive”, relatively speaking, it’s still “well under” your goal of EUR 2 per month.

        • @callccOP
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          That’s actually a good point. Will need to think about server location and GDPR compliance.

  • @JupiterThirdMoon
    link
    English
    42 months ago

    I use purelymail, you can register unlimited number of domains and get SMTP + IMAP in return (+ Roundcube webmail). Perfect for my usage with few automated services

    • @callccOP
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      Amazing! Now this is something I haven’t heard of. I think we might have a winner here! Best thing, I could use it for transactional mail on all my websites for 10€/yr. Including as many inboxes as needed. Nice!

  • hendrik
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You could use some containerized mail server like Mailcow. They’re pretty alright to set up and should work fine for low volume. At least in my experience. Unless you don’t want to deal with mail yourself, then you should maybe consider a paid service. But I don’t have any experience with those.

    • @callccOP
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I specifically want to not deal with deliverability beyond the content and volume of my mails.

  • Meldrik
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 months ago

    SMTP2GO - 1000 free emails a month, 200 emails a per day.

  • @bmcgonag
    link
    English
    32 months ago

    Been using Purelymail, full email, but SMTP as well, and love the service thus far.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      I’ll second PurelyMail. Easy to set up and they have explainers for all the various settings. I pay $10 a year for “unlimited” domains and mailboxes (some caveats but for minimal mail we won’t hit any limits).

    • @callccOP
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      Exactly what I’m looking for. Thanks a lot!

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    32 months ago

    i suspect this falls under the golden rule of 3… price,quality,[ethics].

    you get to pick 2

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      Agreed, and well-articulated. I think you (OP) need to ask yourself whether you’re willing to pay the appropriate market rate for the service or not. I don’t know what that is, but I expect it’s higher than you’ve expressed.

      • @callccOP
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        Have a look at purelymail mentioned by others. It’s almost exactly what I’m looking for.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          Also, we’re in beta

          That means there might be a few hiccups along the way. If you run across any problems you can always let us know, and we’ll do our best to fix them.

          I would have thought this is a disqualifier in terms of quality of the service, but if that’s acceptable to you then I’m glad you got something that works.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Check out MXRoute. (Specifically the lifetime promo, though I’ve seen it on sale for cheaper.)

    • @callccOP
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      Thanks but that’s not what I’m looking for. I need to send mails only.

  • @Treczoks
    link
    English
    -62 months ago

    “Low volume” vs. “A few hundred mails per month”

    OK, what of the above?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      A few hundred a month is just a few per day. That is pretty low volume by most standards.

      I would say in general if the SMTP server could be replaced by a single human writing and mailing snail-mail letters by hand it qualifies as low volume.

    • @callccOP
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      This is something you used to be able to do for free, no problem. It’s only a few of the big mail accepting companies being extra shitty about accepting mail making this tough. Looking at you Microsoft. So a few hundred mails per month is ridiculous both on storage, bandwidth and CPU consumption.

      • @Treczoks
        link
        English
        22 months ago

        I know. I was there, before Sanford Wallace invented the email spam and forced any sane SMTP server into password protections and whitelists.