• @recapitated
    link
    English
    116 hours ago

    Your headline is exactly how I want information fed to me. Perfect minimalism achieved through maximizing bottom line up front.

    • @jatoo
      link
      English
      11 hour ago

      Only thing missing is whether it was on purpose or by accident.

  • @Crashumbc
    link
    English
    36 hours ago

    There are large parts of Europe that are off limits today because of so much exploded ordinance.

  • @dovah
    link
    English
    37 hours ago

    If someone had died, would we count that as another WWII casualty?

  • @WoahWoah
    link
    English
    69 hours ago

    AND DON’T YOU FORGET IT!

  • THCDenton
    link
    English
    89 hours ago

    Sheesh somethinh like 80 years and there’s still live ones out there

    • @Madison420
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Heheh don’t look of the coast of England, there’s not a partially submerged ammo ship full of uxo in a shipping lane that inches ever closer to exploding day by day as stabilizer leaches out.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Richard_Montgomery

      According to a survey conducted in 2000 by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency,[5]: 2000 survey, p21–22  the wreck still held munitions containing approximately 1,400 tonnes (1,500 short tons) of TNT high explosive.[5]: 2000 survey, p21–22  This comprises the following items of ordnance:

      286 × 2,000 lb (910 kg) high explosive bombs

      4,439 × 1,000 lb (450 kg) bombs of various types

      1,925 × 500 lb (230 kg) bombs

      2,815 fragmentation bombs and bomb clusters

      Various explosive booster charges

      Various smoke bombs, including white phosphorus bombs

      Various pyrotechnic signals

      According to a BBC News report in 1970,[12] it was determined that if the wreck of Richard Montgomery exploded, it would throw a 300 metres (980 feet)-wide column of water and debris nearly 3,000 metres (9,800 feet) into the air and generate a wave 5 metres (16 feet) high. Almost every window in Sheerness (population circa 20,000) would be broken and buildings would be damaged by the blast. News reports in May 2012 however, including one by BBC Kent, stated that the wave could be about one metre (3.3 feet) high, which although lower than previous estimates would be enough to cause flooding in some coastal settlements.[13][b]

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 hours ago

        Damn, that’s quite fucked up. Also they fear to remove the explosives because they fear that even the slightest movement could detonate everything.

      • @n0clue
        link
        English
        13 hours ago

        deleted by creator

  • @slickgoat
    link
    English
    411 hours ago

    The US is still blowing up Japan? Talk about nursing a grudge.

  • @Inucune
    link
    English
    512 hours ago

    Why was there a WW2 bomb at a Japanese airport?

    • @FilthyShrooms
      link
      English
      1412 hours ago

      Because Japan was a part of WWII? Also because airports were military targets?

      • @Inucune
        link
        English
        711 hours ago

        Ok. I thought it was being transported or displayed. It is left over uxo.

        • @stoly
          link
          English
          27 hours ago

          Munitions from WWI are still out there in large quantities and waiting to explode some toddler playing ball in a field.

        • @kalpol
          link
          English
          18 hours ago

          XO now

          BTW if anyone wants a great show, Danger UXB is super good if you can find it.