• @recapitated
    link
    English
    132 months ago

    Your headline is exactly how I want information fed to me. Perfect minimalism achieved through maximizing bottom line up front.

    • @jatoo
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      Only thing missing is whether it was on purpose or by accident.

  • THCDenton
    link
    English
    82 months ago

    Sheesh somethinh like 80 years and there’s still live ones out there

    • @Madison420
      link
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Heheh don’t look of the coast of England, there’s not a partially submerged ammo ship full of uxo in a shipping lane that inches ever closer to exploding day by day as stabilizer leaches out.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Richard_Montgomery

      According to a survey conducted in 2000 by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency,[5]: 2000 survey, p21–22  the wreck still held munitions containing approximately 1,400 tonnes (1,500 short tons) of TNT high explosive.[5]: 2000 survey, p21–22  This comprises the following items of ordnance:

      286 × 2,000 lb (910 kg) high explosive bombs

      4,439 × 1,000 lb (450 kg) bombs of various types

      1,925 × 500 lb (230 kg) bombs

      2,815 fragmentation bombs and bomb clusters

      Various explosive booster charges

      Various smoke bombs, including white phosphorus bombs

      Various pyrotechnic signals

      According to a BBC News report in 1970,[12] it was determined that if the wreck of Richard Montgomery exploded, it would throw a 300 metres (980 feet)-wide column of water and debris nearly 3,000 metres (9,800 feet) into the air and generate a wave 5 metres (16 feet) high. Almost every window in Sheerness (population circa 20,000) would be broken and buildings would be damaged by the blast. News reports in May 2012 however, including one by BBC Kent, stated that the wave could be about one metre (3.3 feet) high, which although lower than previous estimates would be enough to cause flooding in some coastal settlements.[13][b]

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        Damn, that’s quite fucked up. Also they fear to remove the explosives because they fear that even the slightest movement could detonate everything.

      • @n0clue
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        deleted by creator

  • @WoahWoah
    link
    English
    62 months ago

    AND DON’T YOU FORGET IT!

  • @Crashumbc
    link
    English
    52 months ago

    There are large parts of Europe that are off limits today because of so much exploded ordinance.

  • @Inucune
    link
    English
    52 months ago

    Why was there a WW2 bomb at a Japanese airport?

    • @FilthyShrooms
      link
      English
      152 months ago

      Because Japan was a part of WWII? Also because airports were military targets?

      • @Inucune
        link
        English
        82 months ago

        Ok. I thought it was being transported or displayed. It is left over uxo.

        • @stoly
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          Munitions from WWI are still out there in large quantities and waiting to explode some toddler playing ball in a field.

        • @kalpol
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          XO now

          BTW if anyone wants a great show, Danger UXB is super good if you can find it.

  • @slickgoat
    link
    English
    42 months ago

    The US is still blowing up Japan? Talk about nursing a grudge.

  • @dovah
    link
    English
    42 months ago

    If someone had died, would we count that as another WWII casualty?