• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    348 hours ago

    Pretty sure he got paid by Nintendo to sue them stupidly so they could slam dunk the case and get a precedent that makes it easier for them to oppress developers

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    249 hours ago

    alleging it “not only offers the hardware and firmware to create and play pirated games” but also provides “customers with copies of pirated Nintendo games.”

    I can see a world where he can offer hardware and firmware, with claims of other intended purposes.

    But the second part wherehe provides customers with pirated software is a slam dunk for nintendo.

    • Cadeillac
      link
      English
      39 hours ago

      Yup, nail in the coffin if there is substantial evidence

  • Flamekebab
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    -There’s a good chance you can beat Nintendo, but you’ve got to visualize how you’re going to win, okay?
    -Gotcha…
    A CONGENITAL HEART DEFECT HAS APPARENTLY FELLED NINTENDO’S LAWYER MOMENTS BEFORE THEY COULD STEP INTO THE COURTROOM

  • NaibofTabr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8614 hours ago

    “A man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client”

    • @tabris
      link
      English
      2113 hours ago

      “And with God as my witness, I am that fool!”

      • @FuryMaker
        link
        English
        1212 hours ago

        Now I need to watch the two Addams Family films again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5214 hours ago

    Sorry, my guy seems like a nit wit all the way up and down.

    If you want to sell mods as a side hustle that’s great, but don’t form a company with the explicit enterprise of infringing the rights of one of the largest and most litigious rights holders in the world.

  • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
    link
    English
    38 hours ago

    hey all y’all telling me that it’s a good idea to fight nintendo? watch this one.

  • @voracitude
    link
    English
    16318 hours ago

    As reported by Torrent Freak, Ryan Daly, the alleged owner of modding company Modded Hardware, has denied any wrongdoing in court — even that he owns and operates the business at all.

    Daly mostly responded to the lawsuit’s claims by saying “denied” and otherwise claimed he lacked “sufficient information to either admit or deny the allegations.” His defenses include fair use, invalid copyrights, a lack of standing, fraudulent inducement, an arbitration clause, failure to state a claim, and unjust enrichment.

    This guy sounds halfway to SovCit and entirely fucked.

    • @Crashumbc
      link
      English
      3014 hours ago

      Yeah, this has all the ear markings of a sovcit…

    • @Dkarma
      link
      English
      09 hours ago

      Based on what?

      • @voracitude
        link
        English
        239 hours ago
        1. He’s going to court without a lawyer, which is always always always a bad idea (I wish that weren’t the case but it is a fact);
        2. He’s tried to claim he doesn’t own or operate the business in question;
        3. His defenses are spaghetti thrown at the wall:

        His defenses include fair use, invalid copyrights, a lack of standing, fraudulent inducement, an arbitration clause, failure to state a claim, and unjust enrichment.

        Many of these (in fact, all but the arbitration clause; that’s probably from their TOS but won’t save him) are SovCit arguments and simply do not apply. They’re going to be dismantled in seconds in court, and I know that with at best a slightly-better-than-layperson understanding of the law. This guy is going to get thoroughly Bowser’d.

        • @PriorityMotif
          link
          English
          123 minutes ago

          Pro se parties often get a more relaxed interpretation of their arguments because they can’t be expected to know everything about the law unlike an attorney. If there’s a chance that any of those arguments has merit then the judge will allow it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49 hours ago

    I know he wont win but i hope he does anyway. Or at least does something outrageous for entertainment.

    • @aeronmelon
      link
      English
      4817 hours ago

      “LEEROOOOY JENKINSSS!!!”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2117 hours ago

        Someone did just that. They somehow got to bowser with only the parachute and killed him with only 3 stars. It was wild

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          714 hours ago

          Someone did a dark souls no hit run, level 0, weapon level 0, any%. Anything is possible.

        • @Nikls94
          link
          English
          216 hours ago

          deleted by creator

  • Cadeillac
    link
    English
    9818 hours ago

    This doesn’t seem like a great idea

    • @demizerone
      link
      English
      2116 hours ago

      If this guy gets 20 years over some silly shit Nintendo is going to look worse.

      • @jaybone
        link
        English
        37 hours ago

        Is this a criminal trial? Is Nintendo taking over for the DA now?

      • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
        link
        English
        48 hours ago

        I didn’t know jail was a civil remedy but hey you seem to know law

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 hours ago

        “Wow, Nintendo, way to go, sentencing someone to hard time in prison for trying to enjoy your games in new and unique ways. Is this what you stand for?”

        • Cadeillac
          link
          English
          09 hours ago

          What are you guys even talking about? He’s going in with out his own lawyers. Not a great idea. No where did I say I want Nintendo to win

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 hours ago

            We don’t want them to win either. The comment was a glib remark that usually people who go in without a lawyer get the book thrown at them. If so, a perfectly plausible outcome is actually being sentenced to jail. If so, that could look very bad for Nintendo. It’s all just hypothetical extrapolation.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 hours ago

              If so, a perfectly plausible outcome is actually being sentenced to jail

              Not in a civil case, as other commenters pointed out. The plausible outcome will be this guy ceasing his business operations and paying Nintendo.

            • Cadeillac
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Would the hardcore gaming community be mad if he went to jail? Yes. Are they already mad Nintendo is taking him to court? Yes. Will the general public care at all? No. Will the investors think Nintendo looks bad? No

              Edit: also, is everyone ignoring the fact that he distributed pirated software on the consoles?