About 8 months ago I got pretty tired of seeing billionaire spam online. I could not bear to read about yet another rich guy who launched themselves (or their $200,000 car) into outer space 🚀 . I did not care about their expert opinion on the latest meme coin back then. I do not care about their expert opinion on the dangers of AI today.

So… I developed a tiny, free, and open source Firefox browser add-on called Block the Rich. It is completely local and private. No data is tracked. No data is phoned home.

The concept is pretty simple: whenever I load a web page, the extension quickly analyzes the content and intelligently blurs out any references to the Forbes Top 10 Billionaires. Some former and wannabe billionaires are blurred out of courtesy as well (I’m looking at you Trump and Kanye 🙄).

This project is a very early prototype that I built in the span of a few days. I have so many awesome ideas for enhancements but the truth is that the wind got completely knocked out of my sails when I put myself out there on Reddit many moons ago. There was absolutely zero public interest. To this day my wife and I are the only ones using the original prototype.

People of Lemmy, do you think there is a place on the internet for such a project, or is it time that I let it go?

Edit: I am blown away by the support from you all. Thank you! I am so excited to start polishing this baby up!

  • @rtxn
    link
    English
    1731 year ago

    My only request would be to have a version that not just blurs the parts but completely removes the DOM elements where they are mentioned.

    • @inspxtr
      link
      English
      571 year ago

      maybe even integration with uBlock if possible?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I wrote a plugin similar to this a long time ago because uBlock couldn’t do it, at least not efficiently. I mentioned it in another comment already so I won’t repeat everything.

        The thing I made turned out to work better for getting rid of links you never want to see (facebook, twitter, quora, etc). You can apply whatever CSS you want to matches, so you can blur using a transform, redact (color: black; background-color: black), hide (visibility: hidden), remove (display: none), etc.

        I even showed it to gorhill but I don’t think he looked to hard at it and suggested I try something in uBO I already knew didn’t work effectively.

        Source - Add-on

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      This is a great suggestion and is pretty similar to what some of the other commenters also requested. I am thinking to support multiple modes:

      • Blur The Rich (current prototype)
      • Block The Rich (your request)
      • Mock The Rich (replace the names of these billionaires with less flattering nicknames e.g. “Space Karen”, etc)
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    124
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Great idea. Could be cool to blacklist people. Say you’re reading an article and think to yourself “damn, that man or woman is a muthafucka!” Then you just highlight their name, right click, and bam! The summaremoved ain’t to be seen agin.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I laughed out loud at this suggestion. Love it. I can imagine this could lead to some confusion if a user blocks a common name, like John Smith… but let me give it some more thought!

  • Move to lemm.ee
    link
    English
    86
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve always believed it would be useful to have a thing like this but for brand logos.

    But instead of blurring or blocking the brand logo like an adblocker what it does instead is show you the face of the top shareholder in that brand. Remove the brands and show the assholes that own them. Where it’s not a single person you replace that brand with the name of the hedgefund or bank that owns the investment.

    It would bring people’s attention away from brand consumerism and to a constant consciousness of the ruling class looming over them in everything.

    • @Screwthehole
      link
      English
      311 year ago

      But then everything everywhere would look the same - whatever random picture it uses for Blackrock

      • Move to lemm.ee
        link
        English
        291 year ago

        That’s kinda the point. Being able to see just how few people own literally everything and thus are influencing opinion through means that people currently completely overlook is powerful. Advertising is literally propaganda. Consumer culture is propaganda. When you cut through that and make people conscious of it on a constant minute to minute basis you will see rapid radicalisation occur. Our society relies on a system of carefully designed barriers that create separation between the people and the ruling class in a way that is unnoticeable to the average person without prompting.

        Think of it like pulling back the curtain in the wizard of oz for people.

      • @Gamey
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        Probably the ugly face of Larry Fink! 😬

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      The way I would like to see it done is that any company name can be hovered over and the top 5 shareholders pop up and if applicable it tells you who the parent company is.

      • Move to lemm.ee
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        This would be a useful additional feature, I think the shock value of the method I’m suggesting would have potential to interest at least some press outlets (probably not the major ones who would recognise it as damaging to the people they represent though). You need some novelty in this kind of thing to get it to spread.

  • @Hazdaz
    link
    English
    521 year ago

    KNOW THY ENEMY

    I think this project is a terrible idea (no offense OP, since I can see this comes from a level of frustration). Simply burying your head in the sand does not make these people go away. It doesn’t stop their abuses of power. It doesn’t make them any less of a bunch of douchebags. We the public need to know what they do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I can see a (theoretically) positive outcome in media realizing that these articles don’t get the clicks they used to (if, i dunno, 30% of users use this extension).

      • KonQuesting
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        “The clicks” don’t matter when these individuals own the media outlets and the social media platforms.

      • @Hazdaz
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Finding this information is tough, but I searched to see what the most popular extension installed in Chrome is. One of the top extensions is Google Calendar. Even with it’s popularity, it only holds a 20% stake in calendar apps, and even then that doesn’t tell you how many people have actually installed the extension for Chrome. Basically what I am getting to is that the number of people who install extensions is really small. Like way, way smaller than us tech-savvy people might imagine, so OP’s extension isn’t going to affect click-throughs in the slightest bit - it would be a rounding error for some of these sites.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Having to constantly see what dumb bullshit Elon is saying or doing isn’t going to change anything in this world except the quality of my mental health. Some of us are just tired

      • @Hazdaz
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        They are counting on you to be tired. That’s on purpose.

          • @psud
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Call to arms

            Excuses as to why I myself am not taking up arms

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It was not a call to arms, it was an explanation of why I think the demand to get riled up on an internet forum is futile 🤷‍♂️

              • @psud
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                I feel my comment was on your first paragraph, about talk getting is nowhere and how blood must be spilled

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, you were describing it as a call to arms, I’m saying it’s an inevitability and nothing in this forum will result in systemic change. I’m not going to keep discussing the issue further because I’ve already had one comment removed by a mod. If you think you can change things then go forth, I’m just trying to live my life without being told it’s good for me to pay attention to rich assholes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      If you already know you’re not going to/can’t directly do anything about what they do anyway, every shred of attention they grab from you is a win for them and a loss for you. That’s personal, and anything that can be done about it, should be done. You’re going to hear enough about them to know to avoid their products and vote against them anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      You know market share, marketing tactics use “mind share”, this would work great against that.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I actually agree with you in theory! But in practice, the super rich seem to crave so much of our attention. We are all being inundated with their daily stream of consciousness and that’s what I’d love to help put a stop to.

      For example, I truly believe that a certain manchild destroyed nearly 2 decades of brand recognition (twitter) just so he could take over the headlines yet again. I do not use his platform anymore, nor do I really care what he chooses to call it tomorrow.

      People like that are not worth our brain cycles.

      • storm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        The headlines you so often see are driven by money and profits. When you see a headline you have no interest in, keep scrolling. It isn’t much different than lemmy. Poor, repetitive content will eventually sink to the bottom.

    • @klyde
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Know they enemy for what? So we can continue doing nothing about it? This thread is full of lames.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    I also have several projects where I’m the only user, but I wouldn’t let that stop me from adding features for fun and exercise.

    It’s not for me though. But I want to stress it’s not because I dislike it, but I find that seeing something blurred almost highlights something that’s gonna annoy me is here. Otherwise my brain would just kinda blank it. Good job tho, and I hope folks here are more interested.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      It’s why I like RSS so much for article consumption since it renders everything into a single text feed. Visiting the actual site is too busy of a layout.

    • Scew
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Yep, it’s an easy fix. There’s better ways to get information about events that matter to you than corporate sponsored fear-mongering… I mean “the news.”

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I try to avoid corpo media as well! But still… if you sort this community by the Top posts in last 24 hours there are a handful of posts about Elon Musk and friends. At least those of us who browse the desktop version of Lemmy can ignore such posts.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 year ago

    not seeing does not equate to not existing.

    let us not blind ourselves to their antics. awareness is key to prevent ourselves from being exploited.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Exactly, you have to see what they’re doing to know how to counter it (or even know that it exists). Living in a bubble isn’t going to help us. Maybe you should install this on your kid’s computer?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I get the sentiment but I more attribute it to giving a child too much attention. People keep clicking and talking about them so they stay relevant. Not only does this feed their ego it drives the hype machines ad revenue

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        But surely people who would consider installing this extension are not the same people clicking and talking about “them”? Or are people really addicted to reading and reposting Musk etc… and need an intervention?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Why can’t I do both? 😊

      I am already protesting so many of their services and products.

      I do not wish for their stream of consciousness to invade my internet 24/7. I can easily disable my plugin and get a general idea of what they’ve been up to whenever I feel like it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    But then you won’t know how they are not paying taxes, or getting money from the government.

  • MisterMoo
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    Back when Reddit was good because Apollo still worked, I had all kinds of keywords blocked (Trump, Elon, John Cena, Kardashian). The idea of being able to bring that to the entire experience of browsing the web is very appealing.

  • @itsnotlupus
    link
    English
    281 year ago

    Instead of simply blurring them, it’d be technically possible to feed their images through a stable diffusion prompt, like “humanoid lizards” or “frantic lemmings”…
    Also, I understand that a large language model could be made to rewrite articles about them with a matching prompt.

    That would be very silly, of course.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    English
    251 year ago

    I like the idea in principle, but I think it’s important to know what the most powerful people on the planet are doing for our own sakes. Admittedly, a lot of it is marketing bullshit, but it’s kind of important to see that so you can see through it and find the true motivations as well. Like their “effective altruism” bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I’m actually ancap and all that, participating in barking contests over economics against those illiterate in it, sometimes, but:

      It does have the use you describe, like watching\reading\listening to propaganda to “read between the lines”.

      Only the fact is that this is expected, and such news are like a DDOS attack, you won’t preserve your sanity to make any use of them.

      The idea is good, and also maybe not using mainstream social media too.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I couldn’t agree more. Describing the billionaire stream of consciousness that we’re being inundated with as “a DDOS attack” is brilliant. That is exactly how I see it.

        I want to take back some control over when I choose to read about these people.

    • Atemu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -231 year ago

      what the most powerful people on the planet are doing for our own sakes

      Ahahahahah hahhahahahaha hahah haha hah hahh…

      Good one!

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        301 year ago

        No, I mean that for our own sakes, we need to know what the most powerful people on the planet are doing.

        They’re not doing anything for us.

      • z500
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Can we please not bring this type of reply over from Reddit?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    Hell yeah there is. The only billionaire news I care about is some future article that talk about how they lost all their wealth because they finally had to pay their taxes or some shit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    I feel like any time you’re on establishment media, it’s all just an ad for the billionaires who own and control the outlets.