• @return2ozmaOP
      link
      English
      139 hours ago

      Douchebag Musk even said during the event “think of it as individual public transit”. SMH

    • @unphazed
      link
      English
      48 hours ago

      I dream of being able to get on a high speed train, going cross country for under $1000… sigh.

      • @return2ozmaOP
        link
        English
        28 hours ago

        California’s high speed rail is still being worked on. Check out this recent flyover video of the progress. You’ll be surprised how far along they are.

        https://youtu.be/HV60ZxASpK4

  • paraphrand
    link
    English
    97 hours ago

    Inductive charging will waste a bunch of energy.

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Inductive charging has come a long way and doesn’t have to have as big a power loss anymore.

      E.g this government research project had 120kw at 97% which is on par or better with existing fast charging methods.

      https://www.elektormagazine.com/news/120-kw-inductive-vehicle-charging-system-achieves-97-efficiency

      Edit: Also anyone charging on a regular 120v outlet, which is really all most people need for at home charging, is in the low 80’s. Also Wiferon has ones commercially available at 93%.

      • @Buffalox
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I’m curious why you are downvoted?
        When searching “wireless charging efficiency” on Google, Google offer this short explanation:

        The efficiency rate of inductive chargers usually falls between 70% and 80%, though some newer models boast efficiencies closer to 90% under optimal conditions. This is slightly lower than the 90% to 95% efficiency rate often seen in traditional wired charging.

        Not too far off from the statement above, and apparently progress is being made.

  • @SlopppyEngineer
    link
    English
    4
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Now he can finally automate the Vegas loop. It would be not that more difficult then this demo, with nice open tunnels, no traffic, no pedestrians. Let’s first see how this thing handles a city with busy traffic.

    20-30k for an Optimus robot. Yeah, and the cyber truck was also 10-20k more expensive than promised so doubts about that price.

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      He said eventually for the robot price. They’ve been designing it to be cheaper to build, so if they get it to the scale they’re talking (big if) then it doesn’t seem unreasonable to be that price.

  • @NeoNachtwaechter
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Does it use LIDAR (finally), or is he still too cheap to do it right?

  • @BigTrout75
    link
    English
    48 hours ago

    Looks like there trying to play off of the success of the Cybertruck

  • @Bell
    link
    English
    38 hours ago

    First off it looks like none of the demo items failed at the event, so that’s a nice change.

    • @CosmoNova
      link
      English
      26 hours ago

      Well that’s to be expected when you set extremely unambitious requirements in the first place. In practice it’ll still be a disaster one way or another because they just don’t think things through. The idea of “personal public transit” suggest they want to compete with buses but don’t meet any of the criteria of a public bus.

    • @seaQueue
      link
      English
      17 hours ago

      The real question is how were they faked? These demos almost never use the real production technology, they’re just scripted to appear to