• @Nastybutler
    link
    English
    67 hours ago

    Karen went full Karen and the judge wasn’t having it. Lovely. As a bonus, every employer who googles her during the hiring process will never hire her, so she’s just tanked her employment prospects forever.

    • @buddascrayon
      link
      English
      26 hours ago

      MFW her name is literally Karen. 🤦

      As a rule I don’t like using a person’s name as a derogatory word but come the fuck on. 🙄😕

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    2411 hours ago

    I love that this story is getting so much attention. What an extremely unpleasant person!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2712 hours ago

    There are some great gems from this trial. This lady sounds not only lazy, but also extremely unpleasant to be around. I imagine she still feels wronged and will never change and grow.

  • subignition
    link
    fedilink
    3113 hours ago

    I feel bad that people like this are reinforcing the stereotype about the name Karen.

  • snooggums
    link
    English
    1913 hours ago

    The example offered was when Conaghan wrote “whiz” in a coworker’s card then claimed another colleague was copying her when they used “whizz” in a different card.

    This story just gets better and better.

  • IndiBrony
    link
    English
    39 hours ago

    Are you taking the piss, Karen? 😂

  • teft
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I always thought “are you taking the piss?” meant “are you being sarcastic?”. TIL

    • @d00ery
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I think it depends on whether Karen knew she didn’t work very hard, in which case her statement about doing “all the hard work” would be sarcasm.

      However, given the other examples in the article I’d say she truly believed she did all the work - and therefore her statement was not sarcasm.

    • @FilthyShrooms
      link
      English
      1511 hours ago

      It sorta is, it’s more like “are you even taking this seriously?”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      No, you’re right. That is what it means.

      The sentence mentioning it in the article was weirdly worded. It wasn’t making any claims about the definition of the phrase, just when it was used.