• @errer
    link
    English
    43 hours ago

    I’m going to posit an alternative theory: the data is actually pretty worthless and that’s why this company is going under. I don’t think these origin websites and the limited DNA sequencing they did is really worth as much as people might think.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    136 hours ago

    Most likely it will all be bought and sold like everything in the world these days. No one cares about privacy or rights especially if it means millions of dollars of profit are on the line.

    The biggest take away from all this is … never ever trust a corporation with your privacy.

    Because eventually they will give up your privacy if it means they stand to lose millions or gain millions.

    Be careful and always leary of new services and conveniences that will affect your privacy because eventually it will be bought and sold to the highest bidder no matter how you feel about it.

    • @danekrae
      link
      English
      96 hours ago

      No one cares about privacy or rights

      First Cambridge Analytica data scandal happend, then the whole world suddenly voted for right wing extremes.

      • IninewCrow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 hours ago

        I guess I should have worded that differently … no one cares if you can maintain your own personal rights or privacy because corporations view your rights and privacy as just another commodity ready to be bought and sold.

        • @danekrae
          link
          English
          21 hour ago

          That’s how I understood it and what I’m agreeing with. It’s how companies like Cambridge Analytica came to be. How people came to be so manipulated.

      • Alimentar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 hours ago

        You do realise all these companies are left, where Musk and a hand few others are right, yeah?

  • Lvxferre
    link
    fedilink
    English
    207 hours ago

    I have a relative who considered doing this test. I’m glad that the family talked him out of it. (Surprisingly enough, not just me.)

    Anyway, my [hopefully not “hot”] take: for most part the data should be destroyed, as it involves private matters. If there’s data that cannot be reasonably associated with an individual or well-defined group of individuals, perhaps it could be released into the public domain, but I’m not sure on that.

    • SGG
      link
      English
      217 hours ago

      Stakeholders that want a payout will demand the data be sold to the highest bidder.

      And other companies will probably be interested in said data and willing to buy.

      I would like for it to be destroyed as well, but capitalism going to capitalism.

      • Lvxferre
        link
        fedilink
        English
        177 hours ago

        You’re right. And IMO they should be legally banned from doing so - because the people who signed up for this crap agreed with 23 and Me’s ToS, not with someone else’s.

        But, well… as you said, capitalism going to capitalism. The “right thing to do” is often out of the table of options.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        27 hours ago

        Cute of you to assume it wasn’t sold tho… JFC some “faith”

  • sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    37 hours ago

    Same thing that happened before that… The dsat got sold, at best “anonymized” 🤡