• partial_accumen
    link
    English
    53 days ago

    A five sentence article isn’t much to go on, but what do homeowner think is going to replace that revenue? Increased income tax? Increased sales tax, which are very regressive especially to lower income folks?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 days ago

      if it happens this time (similar proposal failed a dozen years ago), they’re screwed. they have no plan at all to make up for the lost revenue source. napkin math says it’s over $1500 per person, per year to make up.

      they got new term limits for the state legislature and governor now (measure voted for two years ago), too… so you’re gonna have a bunch of rookies trying to sort out the mess.

    • @Lost_My_Mind
      link
      English
      43 days ago

      I would be willing to bet the answer to that question in their minds is “Not my problem, as long as the solution doesn’t affect me”.

      And they give it zero thought afterwards.

      • partial_accumen
        link
        English
        23 days ago

        But every likely scenario will affect them. I don’t see how they can think there isn’t a scenario that won’t affect them personally. A state can’t just carve out a huge hole in its income stream that pays for services without massively impacting the residences either by reduced services, or increases in other revenue generating methods. Is that just lack of imagination on their part?

        • @Lost_My_Mind
          link
          English
          13 days ago

          Yes. Like I said, ZERO thought after “it better not affect me. Stop taxing me…and that’s the end of the conversation for me”.