• @njm1314
    link
    English
    17
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    That may be the first thing he said that I agree with him on ever.

  • Lad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3210 hours ago

    Comrade Starmer lmao

    He’s right though. I’d very much like a PM to take a hard line on these chuckle fucks.

    • JaggedRobotPubes
      link
      English
      88 hours ago

      Nothing “comrade” about it. It’s just sense.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 hours ago

      He definitely is. It’s refreshing to finally even hear this sentiment from our government. However it’s just words, hopefully we start seeing some positive changes in the rental and housing market.

  • @captainlezbian
    link
    English
    89 hours ago

    I don’t know why they seem to think they are. Yes some landlords do labor, but that labor is to maintain and improve value of their income from owning things.

      • @captainlezbian
        link
        English
        26 hours ago

        Yeah he’s a relative who started as a handyman and kept investing in rental property.

  • @Reddfugee42
    link
    English
    1711 hours ago

    They do no labor, they create no good, they accomplish no service. Literal rent-seeking.

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1410 hours ago

    Well I remember when I used to rent I don’t remember my landlord ever doing anything. He owns the property but he certainly didn’t maintain it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    And, as everyone here says. He is correct. It is an investment. Not work. Yes you are taking a risk, that is the point. If you work, you should not be taking a risk. But instead paid for your labour.

    Unfortunately, saying it here doesn’t matter. Papers like the telegraph and other Tory press are not going to care about the facts. They only care about creating division.

    More importantly, Starmer et al. Are also not going to make the effort to argue this case. No effort is going to be made to push forward the true difference between working class income and actual investment income.

    Anyone watching saw this argument starting during the election. It was clear then when labour started talking about working taxes. The Tories instantly started arguing that the Tories were talking about not raising taxers at all. Anyone watching saw this discussion forming.

    And Starmer et al. intentionally ignored it rather than draw attention to the difference. They will not bother to fight the terminology now either.

  • @TheGrandNagus
    link
    English
    5114 hours ago

    Based from Starmer there.

    Landlords and shareholders aren’t working people.

    • The Snark Urge
      link
      English
      2014 hours ago

      This might be my favourite thing he’s said yet

      • granolabar
        link
        fedilink
        1912 hours ago

        In a country like UK… He just pissed off a lot of parasites.

        And thats a good thing! They got too comfortable over last 40 years.

        UK is fucking gutted from within, and peasants accept it lol

      • granolabar
        link
        fedilink
        -17 hours ago

        Context for this statement?

        Is he pandering to beat down brits?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          He’s a self serving neoliberal who doesn’t give two fucks about the working class.

          He has made it clear all along that he is nothing but a corporate and establishment shill, and while making this one accidentally accurate statement about landlords, his party is planning to, for example, go ahead with pretty much the exact same cuts and abuses (E: like the government having unlimited access to the bank accounts of all benefits claimants) that the Tories had planned for the poorest in society, along with trying to force as many sick and disabled people in to work as they can (without providing any more support or income to help this happen of course, just more punishment for those who can’t “refuse”). Landlords will not be getting any of the same treatment.

          His statement doesn’t reflect any moral leanings, nor a will or intent to change anything for the better.

  • @ynazuma
    link
    English
    6915 hours ago

    That is correct. They might work, but in context they are not “working people”

    Here “working people” is synonymous with “working class”. Thus, not landlords and shareholders obviously

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 hours ago

      I’m curious about your definition of shareholder; what if I owe £80 worth of fractional shares in an app-based investment service? Does that make me a shareholder?

      • @ynazuma
        link
        English
        35 hours ago

        It’s not my definition. It is the definition that is being used in context in the article. Read it before commenting

        The definition being used is proper and common in modern usage.

  • Hossenfeffer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3914 hours ago

    Of course they’re not working people. They are leveraging capital to give them an income. That is not the same as chopping wood and carrying water.

  • @kitnaht
    link
    English
    4114 hours ago

    I mean, he’s right. The whole point of my mother leveraging her home to become a landlord back then was because she had a stroke and literally could-not-work. Landlords aren’t working class. They’re just investors.

  • MrSilkworm
    link
    English
    3414 hours ago

    Because he is correct

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1514 hours ago

    Yeah, Starmer is right though…

    By definition if you make all the money you need to live from investments like stocks, bonds, or leasing out homes then you aren’t working class. If you work a regular job, but have some additional income from investment savings you are working class, but the Labour government isn’t having to focus on those investments going up as much as making your working life more comfortable.

  • @chonglibloodsport
    link
    English
    -17 hours ago

    Are you a landlord if you let a room to help you pay bills at the end of a month? Are you a shareholder if you have a pension?

    Judging by the answers here, the answer is no. But then we’re talking about millions of people who work everyday factory jobs, retail jobs, or low level office jobs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Yes if you own rather then sublet and yes now final salary etc pensions are close to non existant.

      Dose not mean it is wrong. But just like the others doing it it is not worked for income but investment income.

      Judging from the answers here everyone has a pretty clear idea of the difference between investment and work.

      • @chonglibloodsport
        link
        English
        24 hours ago

        Right, but I hope we’re able to see the difference between a working person who has investments and someone who earns the bulk of their income from investments. Similarly for real estate.

        Because calling someone who works and has investment savings for retirement (such as a pension) “not a working person” is not just plain wrong, it’s extremely offensive, especially coming from a career politician like Starmer.

    • granolabar
      link
      fedilink
      26 hours ago

      You make valid points in a logical sense but issue of class is the issue of class, not descriptor of economic activity.

      • @chonglibloodsport
        link
        English
        16 hours ago

        Sure, class is the big issue on everyone’s minds. But the remedies people often throw around are here indiscriminate enough to target the room-letter and the building ownership company alike. The tycoon and the pensioner alike.

        • granolabar
          link
          fedilink
          16 hours ago

          Coupling owner class with grandma is a nice touch.

          Bigger point is that grandma siding with owner class is 🤡