Former President Donald Trump heaped praise on authoritarian Chinese President Xi Jinping during a lengthy interview Friday with the podcaster Joe Rogan.

“We’re dealing with the smartest people,” Trump said, referring to the leaders of U.S. adversaries, about an hour and a half into their conversation.

“They hate when I say, you know, when the press — when I called President Xi, [the press] said, ‘Well, he called President Xi brilliant.’ Well, he’s a brilliant guy. He controls 1.4 billion people with an iron fist. I mean, he’s a brilliant guy, whether you like it or not. And they go crazy.”

  • YeetPics
    link
    fedilink
    92 hours ago

    And the tankies will lie to your face and say they really truly just support Jill Stein for no other reason than her stellar campaigning skills. Lmao.

    What a fucking joke half this platform is 🤣

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    153 minutes ago

    I bet the superior Yi Ping Ping Pong doesn’t rape minors in China. That doesn’t mean I want his ass telling me what to do. Fuck that Winnie the Pooh wannabe bitch. But it means, he’s not Trump. But to be fair, Pooh probably orders lots of people’s executions per month. Trump orders McDonald’s. So there’s that difference too.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    134 hours ago

    Remember when Romney saying “45% of Americans don’t matter, now watch me look for a wine menu at McDonald’s!” was enough to lose the presidency?

    Pepper Ridge Farm remembers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      150 minutes ago

      Tbf, as a Mormon, Romney does not drink alcohol so he wouldn’t ever be looking for a wine list…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74 hours ago

    Trump is pulling the invader zim " I will rule you all with an iron fist" and people are cool with it. I feel like half the country went to “Skool”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -348 minutes ago

      Not trying to be a dick (though I guess it kind of happened anyway), but maybe part of the issue here is that people are referencing cartoons instead of actual would history, when talking about the imminent threat of an autocratic ruler.

      Just saying…

    • @Fredselfish
      link
      207 hours ago

      This the fucking world my dad wants us to live in. He begged me tonight to please vote Trump he going save us.

      Wonder what my dad would think about this? He hates China says Trump hates China and will make them pay with tariffs. I tried to explain that we pay those not China but it wss like talking to a brike wall.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        116 hours ago

        My dad’s the same way, he hasn’t pleaded with me about my vote but that may only be because I don’t talk to him.
        Have you seen “The Brainwashing of My Dad”? I think that’s what it’s called, a friend recommended it to me and I need to make some time for it, sounds like it covers the impact of garbage like fox news on old men

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 hours ago

          I’ve actually heard using parental to controls to block Fox News magically turns right wingers into decent human beings/otherkin forced to live as human beings.

          • @halcyoncmdr
            link
            English
            43 hours ago

            Note that you may have to deal with symptoms similar to addicts coming off their high, because that’s exactly what it is.

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    3311 hours ago

    This has been up for two hours, I wonder where the propagandists hollering about genocide are.

    Edit, four hours now: It must be acceptable to genocide Uyghurs, I guess.

    • @barsquid
      link
      13 hours ago

      We all knew that. Just like it is acceptable to jail citizens for writing mean things about the government on the internet.

    • @Myxomatosis
      link
      207 hours ago

      I suspect that most of them don’t really care about genocide or the welfare of others in general. It’s a self-righteous bandwagon for them to jump on.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 hours ago

        At this point, I’m just posting this graphic

        Anytime I run into the “Don’t Vote Harris, that will stop Genocide!” camp

        • Funderpants
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          And the democrats are at least working towards a cease fire. Trump would let Bibi turn his enemies lands to glass because Trump only cares about Trump.

    • @seaQueue
      link
      137 hours ago

      Those are in the Kamala threads doing what they’re paid to do

      • ArxCyberwolf
        link
        fedilink
        11 hour ago

        They don’t need to be paid to be ignorant. A lot of people don’t understand nuance or how the American political system works and it shows in those threads.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        I’m honestly still skeptical of that, It seems to me like Lemmy would be too small to be an efficient use of a paid shill’s time, vs having them go to a mainstream social media platform. I think they’re either genuine in intent but have twisted themselves into a completely counterproductive idea of what to do out of anger at how things in the world have gone, or in some cases are people trolling for a position they don’t support, but who are doing it for free to advance their own position rather than for a paycheck.

  • Media Bias Fact CheckerB
    link
    -514 hours ago
    HuffPost - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for HuffPost:

    Wiki: reliable - A 2020 RfC found HuffPost staff writers fairly reliable for factual reporting on non-political topics, but notes that they may give prominence to topics that support their political bias and less prominence to, or omit, things that contradict it. HuffPost’s reliability has increased since 2012; articles before 2012 are less reliable and should be treated with more caution. HuffPost uses clickbait headlines to attract attention to its articles, thus the body text of any HuffPost article is considered more reliable than its headline. See also: HuffPost (politics), HuffPost contributors.
    Wiki: mixed - In the 2020 RfC, there was no consensus on HuffPost staff writers’ reliability for political topics. The community considers HuffPost openly biased on American politics. There is no consensus on its reliability for international politics. See also: HuffPost (excluding politics), HuffPost contributors.
    Wiki: unreliable - Until 2018, the U.S. edition of HuffPost published content written by contributors with near-zero editorial oversight. These contributors generally did not have a reputation for fact-checking, and most editors consider them highly variable in quality. Editors show consensus for treating HuffPost contributor articles as self-published sources, unless the article was written by a subject-matter expert. In 2018, HuffPost discontinued its contributor platform, but old contributor articles are still online. Check the byline to determine whether an article is written by a staff member or a “Contributor” (also referred to as an “Editorial Partner”). See also: HuffPost (excluding politics), HuffPost (politics).


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-praises-chinese-president-for-controlling-citizens-with-an-iron-fist_n_671d1644e4b07a44a28e2211

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support