Package includes Nasams air defence system that Taiwan says will help it in the face of China’s frequent military manoeuvres

China will take “countermeasures” to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity, the government said, lambasting a $2bn arms sale package by the United States to Taiwan.

The Pentagon on Friday said the United States had approved a potential $2bn arms sale package to Taiwan, including the delivery for the first time to the island of an advanced air defence missile system battle-tested in Ukraine, including advanced surface-to-air missile systems and radar. The deal awaits approval by Congress.

China has over the past five years stepped up its military activities around democratically governed Taiwan, whose government rejects Beijing’s sovereignty claims, including staging a new round of war games earlier this month.

Taiwan’s government welcomed the new arms sale, the 17th of the Biden administration to the island.

  • kn0wmad1c
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 hour ago

    Wait, but if Taiwan is a part of China, wouldn’t it be China getting the weapons?

    So why are they mad, Bart? Why are they mad?

  • YeetPics
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 hours ago

    if you guys call me little bitch 13 or 14 more times I am totally out of here

    -little bitch

  • @Zexks
    link
    English
    103 hours ago

    West Taiwan big mad

  • @foggy
    link
    English
    -6
    edit-2
    31 minutes ago

    I’ve been saying for about 13 months now that Taiwan is the flashpoint of WWIII.

    I’ve been saying it will likely be sometime between December 2024 and January 2030, but leaning heavily towards sooner than later.

    We’re still on track.

    Edit: like clockwork, my comment on this is always controversial. This time I think most of you just need a dictionary for what “flashpoint” means.

    • YeetPics
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Nah, west Taiwan started it (per usual).

      They don’t HAVE to claim ownership of things that aren’t theirs.

      Quickly aging despots are the true flashpoint. See Xi, Putin, Trump, Netanyahu

      • @foggy
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I didn’t say that China didn’t start it?

        And those despots haven’t caused WWIII to fully begin, yet.

        So, I repeat, I predict that Taiwan will be the flashpoint of WWIII. When China inevitably strikes Taiwan, the US will protect Taiwan. We have too much on the line.

        This will cause the necessary entanglements of world alliances to call the then global conflict WWIII.

        • YeetPics
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          My point is that Taiwan isnt the flashpoint for ww3, but instead the totalitarian despot from China who wants Taiwan.

          Causality traces back to the little bear cartoon looking fuckwit, not the independent nation of Taiwan.

          Also; If it’s so regular that your comments get rebuked that you felt compelled to edit your comment to mark your correct guess that your opinion would be countered, perhaps there is an issue with your perspective on this situation and not every other user you interact with?

          • @foggy
            link
            English
            134 minutes ago

            You’re not worth talking to.

          • @TommySalami
            link
            English
            21 hour ago

            The term “flashpoint” has nothing to do with assigning blame. It just defines an event/place where things kicked off into something way bigger. If WW3 started due to a strike on Taiwan it would be accurate to refer to Taiwan as a flashpoint, because the conflict in Taiwan would be the origin. I don’t see how any of that takes away from China being the aggressor, or why the conflict would happen.

            I get wanting to make it clear China is the problem here, I agree, but we have terms that refer to things objectively for a reason. You don’t have to say everything at once with every sentence.

            • @foggy
              link
              English
              133 minutes ago

              It’s like they said “Nah” and then agreed with me and thinks they’re on a out something.

  • Media Bias Fact CheckerB
    link
    English
    -34 hours ago
    The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Guardian:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian’s op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
    Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a “blogposts” tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Guardian:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian’s op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
    Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a “blogposts” tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Guardian:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian’s op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
    Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a “blogposts” tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/27/us-taiwan-arms-deal-china-vows-countermeasures-nasams
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/26/us-foreign-aid-bill-package-details
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/14/china-military-taiwan-drills-president-lai-national-day-speech

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support